Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Advertisements

SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou. PS2 meant as potential replacement of existing PS PS2 main characteristics given by LHC requirements – Circumference defined.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
BEAM’07 summary PS2 October 5 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 M. Benedikt.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
Optics considerations for PS2
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
PS2 design status Y. Papaphilippou LIS section meeting
Progress of SPPC lattice design
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Superconducting Ultimate-Storage-Ring Design
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
Optics considerations for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Vertical Dogleg Options for the Ion Collider Ring
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2 PS2 review Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou May 29th, 2008

NMC lattice options for PS2 Contributors W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli (CERN), D. Trbojevic (BNL) G. Arduini, R. deMaria, R. Garoby, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J. Jowett, E. Metral, D. Möhl (CERN), Y. Senichev (FZ Jülich) Acknowledgements 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Outline Lattice design constraints for PS2 Negative (Flexible) Momentum Compaction modules Design principle NMC rings With dispersion suppressor Resonant Hybrid Tunability and optics’ parameter space scan Chromaticity correction Orbit correction Dynamic aperture Comparison and perspectives 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Optics constraints for PS2 ring Incoherent space charge tune-shift Basic beam parameters PS PS2 Injection kinetic energy [GeV] 1.4 4 Extraction kinetic energy [GeV] 13/25 50 Circumference [m] 200π 1346 Transition energy [GeV] 6 8-12(i) Dipole function type Combined Separated Dipole length [m] 5 3-4 Maximum bending field [T] 1.2 1.8 Maximum quadrupole gradient [T/m] 17 Maximum beta functions [m] 23 60 Maximum dispersion function [m] 3 Minimum drift space for dipoles [m] 1 0.5 Minimum drift space for quads [m] 0.8 Layout Circle Racetrack Maximum arc length [m] ~510 Improve SPS performance Analysis of possible bunch patterns: CPS2 = (15/77) CSPS = (15/7) CPS Time for bunch splitting with 10MHz RF systems Operational flexibility and low cost Normal conducting magnets Aperture considerations for high intensity SPS physics beam Space considerations Long straight section minimum length for injection and extraction elements

Negative Momentum Compaction modules Avoid transition crossing (beam instabilities and losses) Aim at negative momentum compaction Modulate dispersion using cells with different bending power Using normalized coordinates where dispersion vector is invariant outside bends Vary dispersion vector in areas of negative dispersion to get NMC Similar approach used for J-PARC high energy ring lattices Main difficulty for PS2: extremely low t (high dispersion) in limited space D. Trbojevic et. all, EPAC 90. C. Carli et al. PAC07 βx βy 5D

NMC lattice options for PS2 The “short” NMC module 1 FODO cell with 3 + 3 bends and a low-beta doublet t of 8.8i Phase advances of 306o and 288o per module Four families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m-2 Max. beta of 44 and 53m Min. dispersion of -4m and maximum of 8m Chromaticities of -1.3,-2.1 Total length of 68.25m Magnet-to-magnet drift space requirements satisfied 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 NMC module Tunability Phase advance tunable between 240o and 420o in the horizontal and between 250o and 320o in the vertical plane 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Transition energy versus horizontal phase advance imaginary 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Dispersion versus transition energy imaginary Almost linear dependence of momentum compaction with dispersion min/max values Higher dispersion variation for γt closer to 0 Smaller dispersion variation for higher γt 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Transition energy versus chromaticity imaginary Higher in absolute horizontal chromaticities for smaller transition energies Vertical chromaticities between -1.8 and -2 (depending on vertical phase advance) Main challenge: design of dispersion suppressor and matching to straights 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Dispersion suppressor and matching cell Similar half module as for the NMC with 3+2 dipoles for suppressing dispersion and matching cell with 1+2 dipoles Using 5 families of quads with strengths within the imposed limits (sharing two half quads with the straight section and arc module Maximum beta of 53 and 60m Total length of 53.75m 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2 11

Arc and long straight section Arc composed of six NMC modules and two dispersion suppressors with matching cells Total length of 517m Straight section with 7 FODO cells with horizontal phase advance of 85.25o and vertical of 74o Straight section drift of 9m Only two families of quadrupoles are used Extra two families can be added for internal phase adjustments Total length of 156.2m

The NMC with dispersion suppressor ring I t of 10.9i Tunes of 16.75 and 14.2 176 dipoles, 3.4m long (1.8T field) 134 quadrupoles in 11(+ 2) families of 6 types (lengths and apertures), with max. strength of 0.1m-2 Max. beta of 60m in horizontal and 57m in the vertical plane Dispersion min. of -4m and max. of 8.8m Chromaticities of -24 and -32 Total length of 1346.4m The NMC with dispersion suppressor ring I 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

The resonant NMC module e.g. Y. Senichev BEAM’07 1 symmetric FODO cell with 3 + 3 bends and a low-beta doublet Phase advances of 315o,270o per module 8 x 315o->7 x 2π 8 x 270o->6 x 2π γt of 5.7i!!! Four families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m-2 Max. beta of around 59m in both planes Min. and max. dispersion of -8.5m and 8.9m Chromaticities of -1.5,-1.7 Length of 1.2m between QF and D Total length of 64.8m 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Suppressing dispersion Dispersion is suppressed by fixing horizontal phase advance to multiple of 2π Solution with odd number of 2π multiples preferable for getting lower imaginary γt 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 The “resonant” NMC arc 8 NMC modules Total horizontal phase advance multiple of 2π Maximum β of 59m Total length of 518m 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

The “resonant” NMC ring II Adding a straight section with 7 FODO cells, using 2 matching quadrupoles Straight drift of 9.4m Tunes of (16.8,9.8) γt of 10.7i 8 families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m-2 Extra families for phase advance flexibility in the straight Max beta of around 60.5m in horizontal and vertical plane Min. and max. dispersion of -8.5m and 8.9m Chromaticities of -21.7, -19.8 Total length of 1346.4m 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Yet…another NMC arc module 1 symmetric FODO cell with 3 + 3 bends and a low-beta doublet Phase advances of 294o,310o per module γt of 10.2i 4 families of quads, with max. strength of 0.1m-2 Max. beta of 49m and 57m Min. dispersion of -2.9m and maximum of 7.5m 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

Arc and straight section Dispersion suppression with 2 extra quad families in the last arc modules Last arc quad. shared between arc and straight Straight section with horizontal phase advance of 87.5o Straight section drift of 10.2m Only two families of quadrupoles are used Extra two families can be added for extra internal phase adjustments Perfectly matched to the arc 19/03/07

The “hybrid” NMC ring III Three types of 8 (+2) quadrupole families (max. strength of 0.1m-2) for a length of 1346.4m γt of 11i Tunes matched to (14.8,15.2) Max. β’s of around 60m both planes Dispersion of -2.3m and maximum of 4.6m Tunability between 14 and 16 in both planes but penalty on the beta function maxima Chromaticities of -21.5, -32.2 The “hybrid” NMC ring III 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

High filling factor NMC Dispersion bx by High filling factor module with additional dipoles in between the low beta doublets γt of 8.66i for the module and 11.6i for the ring Max. horizontal beta of 53m and vertical of 46m Min. dispersion of –4.3 and maximum of 3.3 m Maximum quadrupole gradient of 0.11m-2 Total length of 75.9 m Chromaticities of -20.2 and -17.4 D. Trbojevic Main disadvantage is the long arc: only 6 cells available for long straight sections

Chromaticity correction Same approach for all three lattice types Sextupoles of 0.4m long placed in the low beta doublet In principle 2 families needed for chromaticity correction Second-order chromaticity and off-momentum β-beating not corrected δp/p=-0.5% δp/p=0.5%

Chromaticity correction Using 8 sextupole families to minimize 2nd order chromaticity and off-momentum beta variation in both planes δp/p=0.5% δp/p=-0.5% 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Orbit correction 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Dynamic aperture 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Comparison Parameters NMC with DS RING I NMC resonant RING II NMC hybrid RING III Transition energy 10.9i 10.7i 11i Number of dipoles 176 192 168 Dipole length [m] 3.4 3.1 3.5 Arc module length [m] 68.3 64.8 71.2 Number of arc modules 6+2 8 7 Arc length [m] 517 518 500 Straight section drift length [m] 9 9.4 10.2 Quadrupole families 11 6 Arc phase advance [2π] 6.7/5.7 7/6 5.7/6.1 Maximum beta functions [m] 60/57 61/61 60/60 Maximum dispersion function [m] 8.8 8.9 12 Tunes 16.75/14.2 16.8/9.8 14.8/15.2 Chromaticity -24.1/-32.1 -21.7/-19.8 -21.6/-32.2 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2

NMC lattice options for PS2 Conclusions Thorough optics design of several NMC modules with low imaginary transition energy NMC with dispersion suppressor is my preferred solution NMC hybrid ring a good alternative NMC resonant ring has limited tunability Relaxing the transition energy constraint (to around 20i) is an advantage: Reduces the optics functions maxima (less chromaticity, more aperture) Leaves margin for tuning and operational flexibility For example, the J-PARC high energy ring lattice is tuned for a transition energy of 30i Lattice choice based on detailed comparison of performance with respect to beam losses Collimation system, non-linear dynamics, collective effects 29/05/08 NMC lattice options for PS2