Recap: What is multiple realisability? Why is it an issue for MBTIT?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Section 1.3 The Laboratory of the Mind Thought Experiments.
Advertisements

20 th Century Views on Mind and Body Logical Behaviorism (Gilbert Ryle): “mind” refers simply to a way of speaking about behaviors ( ) Mind-Brain.
More 20 th Century Theories of Mind Eliminative Materialism: we should replace terms like “thought” with purely material expressions Paul Churchland (1942.
Developmental Psychology ATTACHMENT. Learning Objectives  To define the term “attachment”  To describe and evaluate the learning theory of attachment.
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
By Stanley Milgram. Learning Objectives  By the end of the session you will be able to:  Describe Agency Theory using appropriate terminology  Evaluate.
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
Learning objective: To understand what is meant by epiphenomenalism and issues with it. epiphenomenalist dualism Causal redundancy.
Philosophy of Mind materialism.
ADDITION USING PARTITIONING The following questions are multiple choice. When working out these questions mentally you must use the following method. e.g.
Learning Objectives:  To understand what Christians believe about the relationship between humanity and animals  To explore attitudes to animals and.
This week’s aims: To set two SMART targets based on formal assessment feedback and progress so far To understand basic ideas concerning each key theory.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Origins of Psychology 4.2.1: Approaches in Psychology Origins of Psychology: Wundt, introspection and the emergence of Psychology as a science. Pages
Draw the WMM. Include as much detail as you can..
Recap on your whiteboards
Features of science revision
Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory
Philosophical behaviourism: two objections
Intro to Localisation of function in the brain
Philosophical behaviourism and consciousness
Warm – Up #1 1. What is psychology?
Starter Task - At the back of your book
What is eliminative materialism?
Philosophical Enquiry
Your homework question Due next Thursday
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism
Starter: What do you think your lesson is about?
Problems for Identity Theory
Learning Objectives To apply knowledge in preparation for the Unit 1 exam To understand the assessment requirements for the Unit 1 examination DO NOW:
4.2.1: Approaches in Psychology
‘In the Snack Bar’ Edwin Morgan.
Unit 1 Psychology Ms Hughes.
Whiteboards – What is the external world?
Agency Theory By Stanley Milgram.
Unscramble The Words What are these key terms from the current theory we’re looking at? Finicalmounts Callaroues Ipunt Optutu Relegatedgunkmown Nupmat.
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Examination Style Questions
Agency Theory By Stanley Milgram.
Lesson 5. Lesson 5 Extraneous variables Extraneous variable (EV) is a general term for any variable, other than the IV, that might affect the results.
Topics in Psychology Aggression
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Recap Questions What is interactionism?
What is meant by the term direct realism? (3 marks)
What did I google to find this picture?
Analytically or Ontologically Reducible?
World AIMS Additional Lesson Resourcing
Something to think about…
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Approach 4: The Cognitive Approach
Essay Writing – What makes a good philosophy essay?
Connection between body + mind
Get started on this straight away!
Starter Task Briefly outline the master argument as given by Berkeley.
What keywords have we used so far
On your whiteboards: Summarise Mary’s Room / The Knowledge argument include the terms Qualia, Information and Physicalism in your answer. Make sure you.
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
Protein Synthesis Recap
Think / Pair / Share - Primary + Secondary Qualities
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
What is good / bad about this answer?
The Ontological Argument
Recap: What were the issues and responses?
On your whiteboard: What is hard behaviourism? What are its strengths?
Which of these things are defined functionally? What function?
Recap – NO NOTES! What key ideas / terms / arguments can you remember from the two theories we’ve covered so far: Direct Realism Indirect Realism.
Animals including Humans
Clinical Psychology Leaflet Task
Presentation transcript:

Recap: What is multiple realisability? Why is it an issue for MBTIT?

Multiple Realisability – Why is it an issue? The issue for Bob the alien, a dog and the man with the damaged brain is that according to MBTIT mental processes just are referring to specific brain processes. Therefore if a being or creature does not have those specific brain processes, how can they ever have the associated mental processes? Brain Process A ====== > Mental Process A Brain Process B ====== > Mental Process B Without Brain process A or B you cannot have Mental Process A or B. If there can be different physical states who share the same mental state, then MBTIT is wrong.

A Weak Response A possible response from the MBTIT is to say that in all of these examples the creatures / people involved are having mental states but they are subtly different, enough that if we were being specific we would describe them as “alien pain”, “dog pain” or, rather disturbingly, “man with half a brain pain”. But this is not generally considered to be an effective response. Pain is pain because of how it feels to the agent involved and we would imagine a broken bone in an animal would feel the same as a human with a broken bone etc. We seem to have the same thought / feeling despite our physiology, not because of it.

A Secondary Issue If we focus for the moment on the response of “different types of pain” ( dog pain, bird pain, human pain etc.) then we encounter a second issue – there are now as many different types of pain as there are different brains. At this point what, if anything, makes each of these things pain? What do they have in common if not specific brain states? Why define them as such? If it is simply because the agent is acting as if they are in pain, then we are moving subtly away from MBTIT and towards a behaviourist approach – that mental states are simply expressions of behaviour.

Summary Tasks: Complete the summary sheet for MBTIT – for each criticism be careful to explain why it is an issue for the theory. Revise your notes ready for a short test in the second part of the lesson. This will only be on MBTIT.

MBTIT Test What is meant by the term ontologically reducible? (3 marks) What claim do Mind-Brain Type Identity Theorists make about mental states? (3 marks) Outline the problem of multiple realisability against MBTIT (5 marks) Outline the location problem against MBTIT (5 marks) Plan a 25 mark answer: “The mind is ontologically reducible to the brain”