Marcus Höpperger Acting Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Società Italiana Brevetti – Roma
Advertisements

Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Better GI protection within the WTO framework Stefano Fanti – Managing Director Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma Geneva, 27 May 2004.
Scope of protection of geographical indications PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
2 Industrial Property 1. Introduction: notion of industrial property 2. International legal framework 3. Main substantive treaties in the field of industrial.
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
What potential for geographical indications in Myanmar?
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004.
Geographical Indicators Daniel Pick Economic Research Service.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
Framework of IPR Introduction International IP Law - Course Professor Niklas Bruun IPR University Center University of Helsinki 25 October 2010.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Overview of origin-linked.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Export University in association with InfoAmericas Exporting 201 – Focus on Latin America Presented by: José I. Rojas May 25, 2007 Intellectual Property.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
Activities and Role of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
G eographical Indications of Punjab By Ch.Hamid Malhi President, The Heritage Association.
Food Quality Labels: the situation today in Europe Assembly of European Regions, Kriti 15 September 2006 Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University
Trademarks and Brands The Role of WIPO
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti Istanbul, Turkey May, 2011 Current Situation on Nation Branding Issues in Georgia.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
SELLO DE ORIGEN “Seal of origin” Adding value to
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
IP Protection under the WTO
Prof. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Intellectual Property Rights
Department Of Commerce
Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Economy
Presentation transcript:

Geographical Indications In the International Arena The Current Situation Marcus Höpperger Acting Director Law and International Classifications Division

WIPO Founded 1970 UN specialized Agency since 1974 184 Member States 24 International Agreements “Promotion of protection of intellectual property worldwide”

Paris Convention 1883 171 Member States

Industrial Property … has as its object … “indications of source” or “appellations of origin” (Article 1(2) PC)

Industrial Property … “shall apply likewise to agricultural industries […] and to natural products, for example wines, grain, tobacco, leaf, fruit, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, beer, flowers and flour”. (Article 1(3) PC)

Terminology Indication of Source Appellation of Origin “Indication referring to a country or to a place situated therein as being the country or place of origin of a product” Appellation of Origin “The geographical name of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality and characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors” Geographical Indication “Indication which identifies a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin”

TRIPS Agreement 1994 Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Integral part of the World Trade Organization (WTO) 150 Members Protection for “geographical indications”

Relationship

Geographical Indications Interrelation between product and origin «Terroir» theory Wine and spirits Cheese, ham and cigars Watches and knives

Types of Protection national level Protection against unfair competition (passing off) Collective or certification marks sui generis protection administrative systems of protection

Types of Protection Protection against unfair competition (passing off) e.g. Swiss Chalet Chocolate

Types of Protection Collective or certification marks e.g.

Madrid Agreement & Protocol 80 Countracting Parties Agreement only 7 Protocol only 23 Agreement and Protocol 50 (Including EC) Following the accessions by these seven countries and by the EC, the Madrid Union will have, on October 1, 77 members: 66 Contracting Parties to the Protocol and 56 to the Agreement. In this map are indicated, in light blue the 11 countries still bound only by the Agreement; in dark blue, the 45 countries which are bound by both treaties, and in green-blue the 20 countries which are bound only by the Protocol, to which should be added the European Community. As we can see, the Madrid system continues to expand in different regions in the world. Europe is still the region the most largely represented (with 42 Members). But the System has now also 19 members in Asia, 12 in Africa and 3 in the Americas. Altogether, the Madrid Union countries account today for more than half of the world population (3.1 billion people) (out of 6.1 billion). Their combined Gross Domestic Product represents about 2/3 of the world gross product. This means that the Madrid System is certainly offering a very attractive market for making business to all those who are entitled to use it.

Madrid System Collective and Certification Marks Rule 9(4)(x) of Common Regulations 1078 internationally registered collective or certification marks 364 in classes 29 to 33

Madrid System

Types of Protection sui generis protection e.g. protected appellations of origin and registered geographical indications

Lisbon Agreement 1958 for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration 23 Member States

Lisbon Agreement 882 internationally registered appellations of origin (808 in force) New accessions Georgia (2004) Peru (2005) DPR Korea (2005) Nicaragua (2006) Iran (2006) Montenegro (2006)

Types of Protection Administrative systems of protection e.g. certificates of label approval for alcoholic beverages

Geographical Indications Instrument for agricultural policy and organization for a market, e.g. quantitative regulations qualitative regulations protection of collective reputation Individual rights e.g. “Evian” TM

Geographical Indications Public law approach e.g. protected appellations of origin “appellation d’origine controlée” Lisbon countries Private law approach e.g. law against unfair competition, passing off, collective or certification marks

Multifunctional Benefits for the rural economy, in particular less-favored or remote areas “Agrotourism” Improving incomes of farmers Protection of products with identifiable geographical origin Effects for “nation branding” Protection of “reputation” = intangible value

Concluding Remarks Valuable intellectual property rights Mulitfunctional Means for product differentiation and identification Need for active marketing and promotion positive protection in accordance with existing mechanisms and specific needs and requirements of all stake holders

www.wipo.int marcus.hopperger@WIPO.int Thank you www.wipo.int marcus.hopperger@WIPO.int