ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Advertisements

Automatically Commanded Steering Function
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Definition for Levels of Automation
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Autonomous Vehicle Submitted by ISO TC 22Document No. ITS/AD (8th ITS/AD, 9 March 2016, agenda item 4)
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Data Storage System for ACSF (DSSA) Informal Document: ACSF Oliver Klöckner 19-21th April th meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo, Ichigaya.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Introduction TRL’s study was performed in the context of ACSF updates to UN Regulation No 79. Focus: Ensure safe system function in all real-world driving.
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Outcome TFCS-05 // May OICA, Paris
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
Suggestion on software update
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Informal Document: ACSF-16-09
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Informal Document: ACSF-11-08
Outcome of TFCS-12 - summary slides - (detailed meeting minutes will be provided separately) April The Shilla Seoul, ROK.
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD-14-07
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (GRVA)
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD Rev1
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
New Assessment & Test Methods
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status report of TF-CS/OTA
WP.29 and GRVA activities on Automated Vehicles
Exchange of information with the WP.29 secretariat
Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Informal document GRSG Rev.1
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Informal document GRSG
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
Emergency Steering Function
Informal document GRRF-78-41
A proposal for approach to proceed work in Cybersecurity TF
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction
Comparison between EDR/DSSAD
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation ACSF-16 in Tokyo drafted document ACSF-16-11, based on WP29 « table of automation ». GRRF-86 drafted GRRF-86-36, providing recommendation to ACSF IWG, e.g. by splitting the work into 10 different items (aimed to be worked independently in sub-working groups). The proposal is to work with the structure defined by GRRF. The present powerpoint document (ACSF-17-xx - industry preparation for B2.pptx) is summarizing industry proposed approach for ACSF next meeting, and providing a cross reference analysis between GRRF-86-36 and ACSF-16-11 (next slide). The excel document (ACSF-17-xx - Industry input for B2.xlsx ) is sorting the input given in the different relevant documents (i.e. GRRF-86-36, ACSF-16-11, WP29 table of automation, ACSF-06-28), following the structure given in GRRF-86-36. Industry used this document as a base for their preparation meeting of March 28-29, and is working on a summary of the main meeting outcome. These outcome will likely be inserted in an upcoming version of the excel file.  Proposed objectives on AVSC B2 by industry for ACSF-17 meeting: Define the basic requirements for each of the 10 items, as defined at GRRF Define working method / pilots / deadline to prepare each item or group of items.

GRRF-86-36 ACSF-16-11 General considerations / establish the limits of the system – GRRF Operational design domain (ODD) Dynamic driving tasks Dynamic control or the vehicle (longitudinal control, ACC, emergency braking and steering; OEDR…) Manual override Transition procedure (and period), linked to driver monitoring System reliability (“Annex 6” + testing + redundancy considerations) Focal point: United Kingdom Minimal risk maneuver (once limits of system are established) Information to the driver Driver availability recognition / Driver monitoring Recording of information / DSSA Consult WP.29 Cyber-security Focal point: TF on CS/OTA Periodical technical inspection (PTI) Focal point: Sweden General considerations Execute longitudinal (accelerating/braking) and lateral (steering) portions of the dynamic driving task when activated. Shall monitor the driving environment for operational decisions when activated. Permit activation only under conditions for which it was designed. System deactivated immediately at the request of the driver. However the system may momentarily delay deactivation when immediate human takeover could compromise safety. System automatically deactivated only after requesting the driver to take-over with a sufficient lead time; may − under certain, limited circumstances − transition (at least initiate) to minimal risk condition if the human driver does not take over. It would be beneficial if the vehicle displays used for the secondary activities were also used to improve the human takeover process. Driver availability recognition shall be used to ensure the driver is in the position to take over when requested by the system. Potential technical solutions range from detecting the driver’s manual operations to monitoring cameras to detect the driver’s head position and eyelid movement System reliability Recording of system status (inc. system behavior) (DSSA-Data Storage System for ACSF, EDR, etc.) Cyber-Security PTI – not included in ITS/AD document