Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Replisome Primase Primosome DNA Polymerase III acts here
Advertisements

Figure 3. Kinetics effects of the C domain on ER–EREc binding
Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
The DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme
Figure: Title: The replisome assembles at the origin Caption: Replication initiates when a protein complex binds to the origin and melts the DNA.
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
RNA ACTIVE FIGURE General features of a replication fork ACTIVE FIGURE General features of a replication fork. The DNA duplex is unwound.
Generalized model of semiconservative replication of DNA
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Bacteriophage T4 Proteins Replicate Plasmids with a Preformed R Loop at the T4 ori(uvsY) Replication Origin In Vitro  Nancy G Nossal, Kathleen C Dudas,
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
Reconstitution of the B
Interaction with PCNA Is Essential for Yeast DNA Polymerase η Function
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Replisome Assembly Reveals the Basis for Asymmetric Function in Leading and Lagging Strand Replication  Alexander Yuzhakov, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Frank P Leu, Roxana Georgescu, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Coupling of a Replicative Polymerase and Helicase: A τ–DnaB Interaction Mediates Rapid Replication Fork Movement  Sungsub Kim, H.Garry Dallmann, Charles.
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Chaperoning of a Replicative Polymerase onto a Newly Assembled DNA-Bound Sliding Clamp by the Clamp Loader  Christopher D. Downey, Charles S. McHenry 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Nickel2+-Mediated Assembly of an RNA-Amino Acid Complex
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Exon Identity Established through Differential Antagonism between Exonic Splicing Silencer-Bound hnRNP A1 and Enhancer-Bound SR Proteins  Jun Zhu, Akila.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Polymerase Switching in DNA Replication
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
A Regulated Two-Step Mechanism of TBP Binding to DNA
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Discovery of Antagonist Peptides against Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction in B. stearothermophilus by Reverse Yeast Three-Hybrid  Laurence Gardiner,
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Trading Places on DNA—A Three-Point Switch Underlies Primer Handoff from Primase to the Replicative DNA Polymerase  Alexander Yuzhakov, Zvi Kelman, Mike.
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Mike O'Donnell, David Jeruzalmi, John Kuriyan  Current Biology 
Bacillus subtilis Glutamine Synthetase Controls Gene Expression through a Protein- Protein Interaction with Transcription Factor TnrA  Lewis V Wray, Jill.
Daniel L. Kaplan, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Presentation transcript:

A Molecular Switch in a Replication Machine Defined by an Internal Competition for Protein Rings  Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell  Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 137-145 (January 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4

Figure 1 Core and γ Complex Interact with β in an Order Dictated by the DNA Structure (A) Clamp loading. (B) Elongation. (C) Clamp unloading. The γ complex and core are connected through the τ subunit. This study shows that both core and γ complex compete for the same surface of β. Further, the DNA structure determines the outcome. The γ complex binds β preferentially in the absence of DNA. But once β is on DNA, core develops a higher affinity for β, and the γ complex is excluded. Upon replication to a nick, core looses affinity to β, and γ complex recycles it from DNA. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 2 Core and γ Complex Interact near the C-Terminus of β (A) β2 crystal structure. A protein kinase motif was engineered onto the C-termini of the β dimer that extrude from one face of the ring. The βPK was incubated with the indicated subunit, protein kinase was added, and timepoints were analyzed on a polyacrylamide gel. The subunits were δ (the β-interacting subunit of the γ complex), α (DNA polymerase of core), δ′ (a subunit of γ complex), and τ (the subunit that organizes two cores and one γ complex into a particle). (B) Kinase protection assays. On the left are autoradiograms of the polyacrylamide gels. On the right is the quantitation of the autoradiograms: no addition is shown by open circles, δ by closed circles, δ′ by closed triangles, τ by open squares, and α by open diamonds. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 3 Protein Footprinting of β Interaction with γ Complex and Core The first four lanes in (A) and (B) are cleavage markers in which [35S]βPK was cleaved with specific proteases (Asp or Gln; lanes 1 and 2, respectively) and chemicals (Asn–Gly and Met; lanes 3 and 4, respectively). (A) Lanes 5–9 are treatment of [32S]βPK with pronase E and V8 protease. Lane 5 is β alone. Lane 6 is in the presence of excess δ. Lane 7 is in the presence of excess δ, as well as addition of unlabeled β equivalent to δ. Lanes 8 and 9 were as in lanes 6 and 7, except γ complex was used in place of δ. (B) Lanes 5–9 are as in (A), but using α or core. The arrows in (A) and (B) point to the cleavage fragment that is protected by δ, γ complex, α, and core. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 4 Site Mutants of β Show the C-Terminus Is Essential for Activity and Interaction with γ Complex and Core (A) Activity assays. (B) Binding assays. The last four amino acids of β were mutated to Ala (see top diagram). In (A), β mutants were titrated into replication assays: β with a wild-type C-terminus is shown by closed circles, L366A by open squares, R365A by closed squares, M364A by closed triangles, and P363A by open circles. In (B), interaction of β mutants with δ (top) and core (bottom) was evaluated by SPR. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 5 γ Complex and Core Compete for β Gel filtration analysis of a mixture of γ complex and core with substoichiometric β shows that γ complex binds β in exclusion of core. (A)–(D) are SDS–polyacrylamide gel analysis of column fractions eluted during analysis of β and a 4-fold molar excess of γ complex (A); β and a 4-fold molar excess of core (B); core and γ complex each in 4-fold molar excess over β (C); β alone (D). Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 6 Core Binds β Tighter than γ Complex in the Presence of Primed DNA The β ring was assembled onto primed M13mp18 ssDNA and gel filtered to separate protein bound to DNA from protein in free solution. [35S]βPK, [3H]γ complex, and [3H]core were used to follow proteins in column fractions. (A) and (B) were the same except that in (A) [3H]γ complex and unlabeled core were used and in (B) [3H]core and unlabeled γ complex were used. Open circles are [35S]βPK, and closed circles are [3H]γ complex (A) or [3H]core (B). Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 7 The γ Complex Removes Clamps from DNA Equivalent samples of [3H]β clamp–DNA complexes were incubated at 37°C in the presence (open circles) or absence (closed circles) of γ complex. At 1, 10, 30, and 60 min, a sample was removed from the reaction and assayed by gel filtration. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 8 Core Polymerase Protects Clamps from Being Removed by γ Complex, but Not after Completion of the Template Core (with τ) was bound to β on a gapped plasmid and then treated with γ complex either under conditions of idling with two dNTPs to prevent filling the gap (left) or in the presence of all four dNTPs to fill the gap (right). The reactions were then gel filtered to resolve [3H]β clamps that had been removed from DNA from those that bound to DNA. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)

Figure 9 Model Illustrating How Core and γ Complex Coordinate Their Actions with β Rings in a Working Holoenzyme Particle Two DNA polymerase cores act on the two strands of a chromosome for simultaneous replication of both strands (diagram A). Each polymerase is shown with its own β sliding clamp for high processivity. Owing to the antiparallel orientation of the strands of duplex DNA, the lagging strand proceeds in the direction opposite fork movement, resulting in a loop. During extension of a lagging strand fragment, the γ complex loads a new clamp on an upstream RNA primer (diagrams A–B). Upon completing a fragment, the lagging polymerase disengages from its clamp, leaving the β ring on the DNA (diagrams B–C). The upstream β clamp falls into position with the lagging strand core for the next Okazaki fragment (diagrams C–D). In going from diagram D to diagram E, γ complex removes the used β clamp from the completed Okazaki fragment. An important feature in this model is that γ complex binds β tighter than core when β is off DNA (as in diagram A), but after assembly onto a primed site, the β ring associates preferentially with core (as in diagram C). The γ complex regains access to β on DNA only when orphaned by core upon completing a fragment. Cell 1996 84, 137-145DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81000-4)