Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
1 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water, Water Quality Standards Program Proposed Water Quality Standard for Natural Conditions.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Understanding TMDLs: A primer for permit writers
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Minnesota Drinking Water Designated Use Assessment Workshop Tom Poleck EPA Region 5, Water Quality Branch May 20-21,
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Module 2 Overview of EPA, the Clean Water Act, and Water Quality Standards - What will we we learn in this Academy? - Who plays what roles in.
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
EPA’s Partial Approval of North Carolina’s (d) List
Fitting the pieces together
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach 5-12-08 Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach How are WQS used in determining if uses are attained ? Under what circumstances must a water be placed on the “Impaired Waters” list? What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? When must one be developed? - How are permit limits for point sources developed ? Other Questions: What are the roles of the various offices? OW, OST, SHPD, HECD ? What are Laws, What are Regulations, What is Guidance?, Policy? What are the objectives and major provisions of CWA? What is the purpose of Water Quality Standards and the Standards Program? What is EPA’s role in Implementing WQS ? What are we going to cover in this Water Quality Standards Academy? What are Waters of the US? How have water pollution control laws changed over the years? WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Water Quality Based Approach 5-12-08 Water Quality Based Approach Determine Protection Level (EPA Criteria/State WQS) Measure Progress Conduct WQ Assessment (Identify Impaired Waters) Monitor and Enforce Compliance (Self Monitoring, Agency Monitoring) Set Priorities (Rank/Target Waterbodies) Handout 2-5 Water Quality Based Approach is outlined in Sec. 302 of the Act Show Video? (Do we need to review transcript to make sure it is OK?) Establish Source Controls (Point Source, NPS) Evaluate Appropriateness of WQS for Specific Waters (Reaffirm WQS) Define and Allocate Control Responsibilities (TMDL/WLA/LA) WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Monitoring and Reporting: CWA Sections 305 (b) and 303 (d) 5-12-08 Monitoring and Reporting: CWA Sections 305 (b) and 303 (d) Document assessment methodology for WQS attainment decisions Categorize all state waters based on WQS attainment status Present results of probability-based design at state or watershed scale Establish monitoring priorities for next 2 years Establish TMDL development priorities for all Category 5 waters WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

California Listing Policy 5-12-08 California Listing Policy Data Quality Number of exceedances of Magnitude, Duration, Frequency Age of data Temporal and Spatial representativeness Aggregation of data by reach/area How to interpret numeric objective How to interpret narrative objectives WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Monitoring and Reporting: Integrated Reporting Categories 5-12-08 Monitoring and Reporting: Integrated Reporting Categories Attaining all designated uses Attaining some designated uses, and insufficient or no data and information to determine if remaining uses are attained Insufficient or no data and information to determine if the standard is attained Impaired or threatened for one or more designated uses but not needing a TMDL because -- a. TMDL has been completed b. Expected to meet standards c. Not impaired by a pollutant Impaired or threatened by pollutant(s) for one or more designated uses and requiring a TMDL 305 (b) Report 303(d) List WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

California and the Integrated Reporting Categories 5-12-08 California and the Integrated Reporting Categories Evidence all uses supporting Evidence some uses supporting (and no evidence other uses not supporting) Evidence insufficient to make use support determinations Evidence at least one use not supported (but TMDL not needed) Evidence at least one use not supported (and TMDL needed) WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

TMDL = SWLAi + SLAi + MOS TMDL Definition 5-12-08 TMDL Definition TMDL = SWLAi + SLAi + MOS SWLAi: Sum of waste load allocations (point sources) SLAi: Sum of load allocations (nonpoint sources) MOS: Margin of Safety - Extra measure of protection due to uncertainty - Can be explicit (e.g., 10%) or implicit (safety factors and assumptions in modeling, etc.) WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Standards-to-Permits Process 5-12-08 Standards-to-Permits Process 40 CFR §122.44(d) Technical Support Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control (EPA/505/2-90-001), March 1991 WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Standards-to-Permits Process 5-12-08 Develop Tech. Based Limit for POC Tech. Based Limits / collect more data TMDL for POC ? “Reasonable Potential” ? Yes No No Yes (Calculate) Wasteload Allocation (WLA) Continued WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach

Standards-to-Permits Process (Continued) 5-12-08 Waste Loa d Allocation (WLA) Use statistics to develop Long Term Average (LTA) Statistics to develop Maximum Daily Limit (MDL) and Average Monthly Limit (AML) WQ- based MDL / AML more stringent than Tech. Based limits ? Water Quality-Based limits in permit Yes No Tech. Based limits in Permit 167D-6C-4 WQSA Module: Implementation and the WQ-Based Approach