Evaluation of Protocol efficiency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 QoS Schemes for IEEE Wireless LAN – An Evaluation by Anders Lindgren, Andreas Almquist and Olov Schelen Presented by Tony Sung, 10 th Feburary.
Advertisements

1 Dynamic Adaption of DCF and PCF mode of IEEE WLAN Abhishek Goliya Guided By: Prof. Sridhar Iyer Dr. Leena-Chandran Wadia MTech Dissertation.
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
Doc.: IEEE /065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.
Doc.: IEEE /1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs, E.-S. Jung and N.H. Vaidya, INFOCOM 2002, June 2002 吳豐州.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r1 Company Confidential November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors:
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
COE-541 LAN / MAN Simulation & Performance Evaluation of CSMA/CA
Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Wireless LANs Session
Doc.: IEEE /110 Submission May 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 QoS Support in : Contention-Free MAC Perspective Sunghyun Choi.
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Considerations on short packet transmission overhead
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
MAC Simulator Calibration Results
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
doc.: IEEE /xxx Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D.
Simulation Metrics, & Criteria Ad Hoc Chairs Perspective Jan. 2001
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2012
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
MAC Calibration results
HCF medium access rules
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
Using Dynamic PCF to improve the capacity of VoIP traffic in IEEE 802
Quantification of Capture Effect in Near-Far Scenarios
Channel Access Efficiency
Simulation Results for QoS, pDCF, VDCF, Backoff/Retry
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
MU-MIMO channel access flow for 11ay
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
PCF Model Progress Update Nov 2000
Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput.
MAC Calibration Results
MAC Calibration Results
WLAN Frame Collision Information
Introduction to Wireless Networks
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
PCF vs. DCF: Limitations and Trends
OFDMA performance in 11ax
1/16/2019<month year> doc.: IEEE
EDCF / EPCF Comparisons
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2005
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
Maximizing MAC Throughputs by Dynamic RTS-CTS Threshold
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
Enhanced IEEE by Integrating Multiuser Dynamic OFDMA
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
4/16/2019<month year> doc.: IEEE
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
Outdoor Mesh MAC Protocol Issues & Considerations
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
Enhanced Backoff Scheme in CSMA/CA for IEEE
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
AP Shut Out Neighborhood Effect
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
Analysis on IEEE n MAC Efficiency
LC MAC submission – follow up
LC MAC submission – follow up
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Protocol efficiency November 1999 Evaluation of Protocol efficiency Alan Winkowski BreezeCOM Ltd. Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

Introduction Analisys was performed on a transaction basis doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/xxx Month 1998 November 1999 Introduction New PHY’s defined lately in 802.11, while MAC remained static Efficiency was analyzed for different packet sizes as well as different transaction scenarios Analisys was performed on a transaction basis Substantial degradation in protocol efficiency Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd. John Doe, His Company

Efficiency calculation November 1999 Efficiency calculation ND = Amount of Network Data 60, 400 and 1500 bytes Data Packets TrD = Transaction duration DFC (Data-Ack and RTS-CTS-Data-Ack) PCF (CF-Poll{+Data}-CF-Ack{+Data}) NDR = Nominal Data Rate 2Mbps, 11Mbps, 24Mbps and 54Mbps Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

November 1999 DFC Efficiency values Events like Collisions and Backoff were not considered, thus efficiency is actually lower Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

November 1999 DCF: Data-ACK Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

DFC: RTS-CTS-Data-Ack November 1999 DFC: RTS-CTS-Data-Ack Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

PCF Efficiency Protocol performance depends on protocol flow November 1999 PCF Efficiency Protocol performance depends on protocol flow Flow simulation is required packet length: 400 bytes Mix of different transactions: A. Data (CF-Poll) - Data (CF-Ack) B. CF-Poll - Data (with CF-Ack on next poll) C. Data (CF-Poll) - CF-Ack (No Data) D. CF-Poll (No Data) - PIFS Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

PCF Efficiency - simulation November 1999 PCF Efficiency - simulation Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.

Conclusions and Recommendations November 1999 Conclusions and Recommendations Quantitative efficiency degradation in all scenarios analyzed Possible improvements proposed: Greater frames for Data and Control information (specially in short frames) Aggregation of feedback information Scheduling in advance by the AP (PCF improvement) Alan Winkowski, BreezeCOM Ltd.