Paved and Unpaved Road Dust

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside August 24, 2004.
Advertisements

WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Regional Haze, Dust, and New Mexico Developing a State Implementation Plan for Dust in the Salt Creek Wilderness Area, New Mexico.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Patrick Barickman, Air Quality Modeler Tyler Cruickshank, Meteorologist/Modeler Utah Department of Environmental Quality.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Technical Review Workshop Report Technical Oversight Committee for the WRAP Board Meeting – July 24, 2002.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Projects:/WRAP RMC/309_SIP/progress_sep02/Annex_MTF_Sep20.ppt Preliminary Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center.
WRAP Modeling. WRAP Setup Two-pronged approach Jump start Regional Modeling Center (RMC) Jump start contractor MCNC/ENVIRON RMC UCR/ENVIRON.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Characterization of Emissions In and Near Class I Areas in the West Forum on Sources In and Near Class I Areas.
Section 309 Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC) University of California at Riverside, CE-CERT ENVIRON.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Haze, Dust, and New Mexico Developing a State Implementation Plan for Dust in the Salt Creek Wilderness Area, New Mexico.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Regional Haze Rule SIP Template Clean Air Corridors Section (d)(3) Brian Finneran - Oregon DEQ WESTAR 2002 Fall Technical Conference.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon and Dust – Sacramento, CA - May 23-24, 2006 WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Regional Modeling Center ENVIRON; UCR.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
New CoHA Product Access Page & Representativeness Analysis
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop Report
Presented to WRAP November 15, 2001 John Kowalczyk & Bob Neufeld
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Air Quality Committee Meeting July 11, 2012 Donnie Redmond
Presentation transcript:

Paved and Unpaved Road Dust Bob Lebens,WESTAR Council Fall Technical Conference September 17, 2002

Monitoring Data Fine soil and coarse particles are 6-26% of the annual average light extinction Fine soil can account for 10-30% of the fine particulate mass Fine soil is almost always <10%, but can be as high as 40% for the haziest days Coarse material is usually <20%, but can be as high as 90%

GCVTC Discounted future emissions from paved and unpaved roads – due to inventory and modeling weaknesses Road Dust impacts presumed to be local Recommended voluntary measures to control dust near Class I areas

Requirement State determines, based on an assessment of the contribution of dust emissions from paved and unpaved roads on visibility conditions in Class I areas, that the contribution is either: Insignificant, or Significant

If Significant State determines the “appropriate and necessary” emission management strategies for the Class I areas.  

Appendices Modeling assessment from the Regional Modeling Center. Assessment of the impact of dust emissions from paved and unpaved roads on the visibility in Class I areas.

Appendices – If Significant Analysis of ‘necessary’ and ‘appropriate’ emission management strategies options and choices. Basis of judgment for establishing ‘significance’ levels.

Preliminary Modeling Results Smallest Cumulative Impact in 2018 0.08 deciview in Weminuche Wilderness Largest Cumulative Impact in 2018 0.31 deciview at Black Canyon of Gunnison NP (Note “Area of State” not defined – assumed to be state/reservation wide. Wind blown “natural” dust was not included in modeling and is difficult to characterize.)

Next Steps Expert Panel review of dust emissions adjustments used in Modeling Review complete by November New WRAP Dust Emissions Joint Forum Dust ‘Significance’ criteria may be the same as that selected for tailpipe emissions

Next Steps (continued) WRAP/EPA technical refinements may delay ‘necessary and appropriate’ strategies (if dust is significant) until 2008.