Reasonable Progress for Additional Class I Areas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excerpts from a Presentation Given to the WRAP Market Trading Form on Recommended Approaches to the Stationary Source NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western.
Advertisements

Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Template You may change the format of these slides But First! Get your information entered and combine your slides with those of your group members!!!
Technical Review Workshop Report Technical Oversight Committee for the WRAP Board Meeting – July 24, 2002.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
An Update on the Colorado Regional Haze SIP Process and Outcomes Presented at: WRAP – Implementation Work Group San Francisco, CA March 2005.
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Projects:/WRAP RMC/309_SIP/progress_sep02/Annex_MTF_Sep20.ppt Preliminary Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center.
Ozone and NOx in the West WRAP November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico Don Arkell Regional Haze Implementation.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
0 DRAFT WRAP Offroad Retrofit Program : Overview & Status Update February
Characterization of Emissions In and Near Class I Areas in the West Forum on Sources In and Near Class I Areas.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON International Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center Overview of WRAP Regional Haze Modeling Activities.
Draft Final Annex to the GCVTC Report September 25, 2000.
Section 309 Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC) University of California at Riverside, CE-CERT ENVIRON.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
WRAP Emission Inventory EI’s traditionally consider 4 sectors : – Stationary Point Sources – Area Sources – Mobile Sources – Biogenic Sources.
Use of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency to Reduce Regional Haze in the West Air Innovations Conference Chicago, Illinois August 10-12, 2004 Rick.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Regional Haze Rule SIP Template Clean Air Corridors Section (d)(3) Brian Finneran - Oregon DEQ WESTAR 2002 Fall Technical Conference.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
SO 2 Data Analysis The following 4 slides attempt to provide a context for a re-analysis of the model results using the milestone inventory. If model results.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
State Regional Haze SIP Development Critical Path for Western States.
Proposed “BART Trading” Rule Bill Grantham September 1, 2005.
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Regional Haze Planning Training.
Yellowstone National Park Very large Class I area (2,219,737 acres) Involves 3 states (WY, ID, MT) Not an isolated wilderness (2.87 million visitors in.
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
EVM 202—Lesson 7 Tools Analysis Case Study
EVM 202—Lesson 7 Tools Analysis Case Study
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan
Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
Case Study for Forest Fire Episode
Бази от данни и СУБД Основни понятия инж. Ангел Ст. Ангелов.
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
DRAFT Reasonable Progress Demonstration
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
TAF Regional Haze Plan Update
WESTAR Planning Committee Report
Glide slide 2 slide 4 walk walk run run run run.
308 VS. 309 DECISION PROCESS November 2001 WRAP Meeting
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
Coming Soon to Your State!
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Market Trading Forum Update
WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Report
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Presentation transcript:

Reasonable Progress for Additional Class I Areas Class I Areas nearby Colorado

Reasonable Progress for Additional Class I Areas: The 309 path allows other Class I areas to be added to Colorado Plateau. The 309 strategies can be applied to these areas Declaration must be made in initial 309 SIP Analysis of strategy options and source/receptor relationships included in 2003 SIP submittal

WRAP Reports: Reasonable Progress for Class I Areas Outside Colorado Plateau Summary of Visibility Benefits of Annex Milestones versus Command & Control with uncertainty Class I areas on Colorado Plateau Best 20% days: The same or better in all 16 GCVTC Class I Areas Worst 20% days: The same or better in 15 of the 16 GCVTC Class I Areas (exception is Petrified Forest) Other Class I Areas in the contiguous WRAP Region Best 20% days: The same or better in all but one Class I Area (exception is Chiricahua Wilderness) Worst 20% days: The same or better in all Class I Areas Class I Areas in AR, MI, MN, MS, OK, and TX The same or better on the Best 20 % and Worst 20% Days

WRAP Reports (cont.) Presumptive glide path analysis for all Class I areas defined in slide 2 – late October 2002 Analysis of the effect of all 309 regional control strategies combined for comparison with presumptive glidepath – early 2003