UK experience of Programmes of Measures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNW-DPC International Workshop Institutional Capacity Development in Transboundary Basins Lessons learned from practical experiences 10 – 12 November 2008.
Advertisements

Water in the East Midlands Sharon Palmer Regional Environment Planning Manager Environment Agency June 2012.
Chinese – EU cooperation on water - Partnerships on Water Challenges 2014 CEWP High Level Conference, 4 th December 2014 Marta Moren Abat DG ENVIRONMENT,
Managing wetlands for wildlife and people Tricia Henton 19 April 2010.
Wet Woodlands and the Water Framework Directive Ben Bunting, South West River Basin Programme Manager.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. DAVID SMALL DIRECTOR OF FOOD, FARMING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY.
Water Framework Directive: a diffuse perspective June 5 th IW0/CIWEM Dr Stephen Bolt Head of Integrated Water and Environmental Management.
Water policy reform – moving ahead Presentation for the Water Policy in the MDB Workshop 22 October 2010 Will Fargher, General Manager Water Markets and.
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
Australian Water Summit Sydney March 2006 Is privatisation of water infrastructure and services the answer? Phillip Mills Director of Water Services, Water.
Water Framework Directive – Coastal issues Will Akast Catchment Delivery Manager-Suffolk.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
1 Integrating water issues in farm advisory services The English Experience FAS and Water Workshop 21 st October 2009.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
Rural Development Plan for England (RDPE) – improving the environment through agri-environment Rosie Simpson, Natural England.
every five years water and sewerage companies submit their investment plans to the industry regulator Ofwat this is known as the ‘Price Review’ the next.
THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS WFD "eco procedure" in practice.
IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)
Technical Advisory Group Tuesday 6 October 2009 Tony Pearson Network Planning Manager.
Conservation management for an uncertain future Mike Morecroft.
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Roadmap to Improving Farm Efficiency and Profitability Setting the Scene Brian Ervine, Environmental Policy, DARD.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
Introducing the Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Professor Philip Lowe and Jeremy Phillipson.
WFD revision – First contribution from the wastewater sector (EU2) EU2 – Milan meeting.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
LNP Rural & Green Economy Group meeting 25 th November 2015 Alan Turner Water Resources Manager Kent County Council Water for irrigation.
Addressing the double challenge EU accession process, an opportunity to address water sector challenges 2016 Danube Water Conference 12 May 2016, Vienna.
Environmental Services Training Group
India Irrigation Forum (IIF) 7 April, new DELHI needs & objectives of iif to meet sustainable development goal in India Dr Ajay Pradhan india.
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
Environmental policies in Europe
WAgriCo An NFU Perspective
Yorkshire Integrated Catchment Solutions Programme (iCASP)
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Challenges in a Changing World
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
Principles and Key Issues
Environmental Services Training Group
Innovate. Improve. Grow. WEAVER: HEXAPOD ROBOT WITH 5DOF LIMBS FOR NAVIGATING ON UNSTRUCTURED TERRAIN.
River Basin Management Planning
EU Water framework The best practice in Germany
The role of IMPEL in promoting the implementation and enforcement of European environmental law Giuseppe Sgorbati & Michael Nicholson IMPEL
Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Scenarios for Urban Water Management:
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
A pilot appraisal at catchment level for the second RBMP cycle: Experience from the UK Presented by: Simon Scanlan (Defra) Kathrynne Moore (Environment.
River Management: An Australian Story
Cross Compliance Implementation & Control in England
Developing the second plans
Strategic Steering Group WFD and CAP, 19/03/2009
What’s a WQIP and what can they achieve?
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
WFD and Agriculture PARIS CONFERENCE
WATER POLLUTION OF RIVERS AND DAMS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Objective setting in practice
Challenges in a Changing World
UK Technical Advisory Group
THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES IN PRACTICE
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
MAES and Accounting support to BD 2020 evaluation
Presentation transcript:

UK experience of Programmes of Measures Presented by: Sonia Phippard, UK Water Director Date: 23 March 2015

Protecting and improving UK waters – some context 62 million people 245 000 km² 17 RBDs 3 international RBDs 5 jurisdictions England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Gibraltar

Improved understanding of the water environment 16,000 investigations to improve understanding of pressures Strengthened monitoring of biology quality indicators Increased knowledge, but still some uncertainty Local economic analysis to inform programme of measures 2nd cycle plans will be based on stronger evidence including updated WFD standards Knowledge Time Monitoring programmes and classification tools Reasons for not achieving good status ? Since 2009 we have improved our understanding of the water environment and have greater confidence in our evidence base. Some stakeholders have pressed for more evidence to reveal the extent of the problems ; others demand evidence to prove there is a case for action. Managing these demands is challenging but our updated plans will be based on a stronger and more extensive evidence base. Know more of pressures through 16000 targeted investigations; We have a more stable monitoring network- now extended to include more biological monitoring,. Also improving the evidence base on chemicals. Also conducted extensive local economic appraisals and to inform updates to the Plans. And reviewed and up dated some of our WFD standards – eg for phosphates. We are more confident of evidence. BUT these developments can make our story on progress very difficult to tell. Nat. programme on wastewater treatment works (£25mill) and abandoned mines (£10mill) supplemented local investigations to get a better picture of the importance of these sources and risks to chemical status. Actions in place to tackle these sources. Programme showed domestic use is dominant source of many chemicals going into treatment works now, suggesting significant challenges for the future. [DN if wanted: As failure of one chemical standard means failing Good Chemical Status, regular revisions of environmental quality standards setting increasingly stringent standards represents increasing pressure on the ability to gain Good Status under One Out All Out.] Measures to reduce diffuse input of chemicals include action on dredging, pesticide use, highway runoff and missed connections of wastewater pipes.

Stronger public participation More partnership working facilitated local partnership working New Catchment Partnerships; Catchment Restoration Fund: Restoring natural features Reducing impact of man-made structures on wildlife Reducing impact of diffuse pollution €31 m secured €6.6 m partner support Additional benefits: Flood management Socio-economic Biodiversity

Innovation to tackle chemicals from abandoned metal mines

Water industry invested €30 billion in England and Wales 2010-15 €6.2 billion to meet environmental obligations Costs are recovered from users through charges Rivers improved or deterioration prevented = 3097 km Lakes improved or deterioration prevented = 21 km2 Transitional and Coastal Waters improved or deterioration prevented = 3953 km2 Wetlands improved or protected = 25 Bathing Waters improved = 52 Shellfish Waters improved = 23 Groundwater bodies improved or maintained = 41 .

Tackling agriculture diffuse pollution: Scotland New General Binding Rules based on agricultural good practice, covering fertiliser and pesticide storage and application, keeping of livestock and land cultivation. Programme of measures included: Over 4000 farms visited in ‘at risk’ catchments Over 5500 km of watercourses visually inspected 1:1 engagement with farmers Workshops/Training events User friendly guidance Outcome – improved good practice and compliance at 80% of farms by second visit

England: new Rural Development Programme Countryside Stewardship: £900 million incl. for: water quality capital grants water quality advice multiannual management agreements Greater focus on delivering multiple benefits for water quality, biodiversity and flood risk management

Restoring the flow Since 2008, we have prevented damage or risk of damage associated with 127 unsustainable abstraction licences across England. We have returned nearly 27 million cubic meters of water per year to the environment. In 2014, we changed abstraction licences on 4 iconic rivers reducing the amount of water that can be taken by around 9.5million cubic metres per year by 2018.

Net gains in ecological quality of English rivers since 2009

In conclusion… Good news But Looking ahead WFD is promoting better evidence, innovation, local capacity and partnerships; Significant investment from water companies and other sectors; progress being made on diffuse pollution; Delivering improvements at element level; But Taking longer than expected to see ecological response; Longer term pressures of economic growth, increasing population, climate change, invasive non-native species Looking ahead Greater use of economic appraisals to support decision making; Better monitoring and updating WFD standards means % water bodies reported at good status may be lower in 2015 than in 2009!

THANK YOU