The Role of the Courts in Law-Making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AREA of STUDY 1 (DP 7) and AOS 2 (DP 1)
Advertisements

Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 1: The ability of judges and courts to make law DP 2: The operation of the doctrine of precedent.
Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 5: Strengths and weaknesses of law making through the courts DP 6: The relationship between parliament and the courts in law making.
Unit 3 AOS 3 The Role of the Courts in law-making
Outcome 3: SAC Preparation Wednesday 5 June 2013.
Chapter 9.  A system of trial where the court is actively involved in determining the facts and conduct of trial.  Originated – 1000 year Roman law.
Our Precedential Court System
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Doctrine of Precedent
UNIT 3 LEGAL STUDIES AO3- THE ROLE OF THE COURTS
Business Law 1 Case Law The hierarchy of the courts.
Legal Studies Exam Preparation Guide Prepared By Peter Cavouras.
Doctrine Of Precedent Group Members Saumya kaushik Samridhi Sikha Das Sana Jahan Satyam Kharbanda Rumani Dutta.
Precedent Topic 7.
 Parliamentary Counsel drafts laws to cover all sorts of situations and possibilities, therefore the language can be vague and non-specific.  It is.
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
1.  How does someone become a judge? What qualifications are necessary? Do some online search on any of the justices of the High Court and find out about.
Evaluation of Law-Making Through Courts. Evaluation The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in.
4.5 THE EFFECT OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION KEY CONCEPT Judges will often be required to interpret a statute in the process of arriving at a decision in.
Advantages and Disadvantages
COMMON LAW, CASE LAW AND PRECEDENT
UNIT 3: AOS 2 The three main ways (means) in which the Australian Constitution protects human rights.
Sources of Law Chapter 5. Introduction American legal system is based on English law  Colonists who first came to the US were governed by the English.
T HE R ELATIONSHIP B ETWEEN C OURTS AND P ARLIAMENTS.
4.2 – Role of Judges in Common Law 1. The main role of courts  decide the facts of the case (that is, what happened)  decide what law applies  apply.
SOURCES OF LAW A (very) BRIEF OUTLINE. SOURCES Common Law Equity Legislation – from UK and EU.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Legal Studies 3C.  People must be treated fairly  Right to be heard by an unbiased decision-maker  Know allegations made against you  Given a chance.
The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law Chapter 14.
JUDICIAL BRANCH Chapter Seven, Lessons 1 & 2. Judicial branch has two main jobs: Judicial branch has two main jobs: Ensure that laws are fairly enforced.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
Chapter 10 The Judicial Branch Complete warm-up Define following words: PlaintiffDefendant ProsecutionPrecedent Original jurisdictionAppeal.
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Permission Required for Reproduction or Display. The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law Chapter.
Comparative Approaches to Protection of Human Rights.
Law LA1: European Union Institutions European Union Institutions AS Level Law: Unit 1.
JUSTICE & OUTCOMES 13 Chapter 1 The Australian parliamentary system Justice & Outcomes ISBN © Oxford University Press Australia1.
THE ROLE OF THE HIGH COURT IN INTERPRETING THE CONSTITUTION AND REFERRAL OF POWERS.
Judicial Precedent As Law. Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent refers to sources of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges.
THE ABILITY OF JUDGES TO MAKE LAW. INTRODUCTION: COMMON LAW  Common law – founded in England, adopted by Australia  It is law developed through the.
The Role of the Courts. What is Common Law? Common Law is law developed through the courts. Also known as Judge-made law and case law. It is created when.
What work you owe me for 5 weekly checks
Commercial & Property Law
European Union Institutions Law Making
SOURCES OF LAW A (very) BRIEF OUTLINE.
Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker
Sources of Anglo-American law, supremacy of law
The Doctrine of Precedent
Parliamentary and European Law Making Institutions of the European Union Notes:
Peter F Hughes Legal Studies 2017 Robinvale College
The Inquisitorial System of Trial
Sources of Law 1 The common law
Precedent Key points.
Exploring Jurisprudence
The Role of the Federal Courts
7.4 – Statutory Interpretation
The relationship between parliament and the courts
Law making through the courts- statutory interpretation
Other important terms…
Constitutional Protection of Human Rights
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
COURTS VS PARLIAMENT.
Haylie Pepper – Perth Using Twitter in P&L Haylie Pepper – Perth
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
The Role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution
Law-making through parliament
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Evaluation of the courts as law-makers
Law-making through parliament
Responsibilities of Key Personnel in a Civil Trial
Presentation transcript:

The Role of the Courts in Law-Making Strengths and Weaknesses of Courts as a Law-Making Body

Learning Intention Success Criteria Strengths of courts as a law-making body Weaknesses of courts as a law-making body. Know at least 4 strengths and weaknesses Need to be able to evaluate ‘weigh up’ strengths with weaknesses to give a strong evaluation Use ‘however’ or ‘whereas’ Come to a conclusion Success Criteria

Can make laws quickly Courts can change the law quickly if a relevant case is brought before them. Not burdened by long parliamentary procedures Can only change the law if a case is before them The court requires a person with standing to bring the issue to court. Courts may also be bound by precedent

Independent Courts are not subject to political influence when making a decision Judges are independent and unbiased and not subject to the whims of the electorate However, as not elected, judges may not reflect current community values when making a decision.

Flexibility Courts can keep the law from becoming too rigid by distinguising, overruling or reversing precedent and may interpret statutes Can apply the laws of Parliament to the specific situation before them to ensure the law is relevant and justice has been served. May be bound by precedent or reluctant to change for the sake of consistency.

Consistency and Fairness Doctrine of Precedent allows for the law to be applied consistently when material facts are similar. Provides predictability, equality and fairness Courts make laws ex post facto. Judges make laws retrospectively or after the act has already occurred. This may be unfair if a person is found to have broken a law that didn’t exist at the time

Develop Areas of Law Courts can develop areas of law Negligence was established by the courts and developed further as the need arose. Courts do not have the resources to investigate whole areas of law as Parliament does. The courts are only able to deal with the area of law relevant to the case before them.

Conclusion Overall, while there are some weaknesses, the strengths outweigh them, making the courts an effective law-making body.

Evaluation of courts as law-makers Justice & Outcomes 13e ISBN 9780195594201 © Oxford University Press Australia, 2015