Christopher C. Quinn, Douglas S. Pfeil, William G. Wadsworth 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
The C. elegans Touch Response Facilitates Escape from Predacious Fungi
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Through the Looking Glass: Axon Guidance at the Midline Choice Point
History-Dependent Catastrophes Regulate Axonal Microtubule Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Ilan D Zipkin, Rachel M Kindt, Cynthia J Kenyon  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages e7 (October 2017)
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Long-Range Ca2+ Signaling from Growth Cone to Soma Mediates Reversal of Neuronal Migration Induced by Slit-2  Chen-bing Guan, Hua-tai Xu, Ming Jin, Xiao-bing.
Chaogu Zheng, Felix Qiaochu Jin, Martin Chalfie  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Two Clathrin Adaptor Protein Complexes Instruct Axon-Dendrite Polarity
Lateral Signaling Mediated by Axon Contact and Calcium Entry Regulates Asymmetric Odorant Receptor Expression in C. elegans  Emily R. Troemel, Alvaro.
Song-Hai Shi, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh-Nung Jan  Cell 
Actin Waves: Origin of Cell Polarization and Migration?
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Jasper S. Weinberg, David G. Drubin  Current Biology 
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Developmental Cell 
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Rapid Assembly of Presynaptic Materials behind the Growth Cone in Dopaminergic Neurons Is Mediated by Precise Regulation of Axonal Transport  David M.
The Requirement for the Dam1 Complex Is Dependent upon the Number of Kinetochore Proteins and Microtubules  Laura S. Burrack, Shelly E. Applen, Judith.
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Tyson J. Edwards, Marc Hammarlund  Cell Reports 
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Kinesin-5 Is Essential for Growth-Cone Turning
Suhong Xu, Andrew D. Chisholm  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
The PAR-6 Polarity Protein Regulates Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase  Huaye Zhang, Ian G. Macara  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (November 2017)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Fig. 3. Genetic interactions between unc-53 and unc-6 and between unc-53 and unc-5 affect intracellular UNC-40::GFP localization.(A–H) Photomicrographs.
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
Drosophila embryonic hemocytes
Fig. 5. EGL-20 inhibits anterior and posterior orientation of UNC-40 asymmetric localization and the formation of axons from these sites.(A–D) HSN neurons.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
Masamitsu Fukuyama, Ann E. Rougvie, Joel H. Rothman  Current Biology 
Brent Neumann, Massimo A. Hilliard  Cell Reports 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

CED-10/Rac1 Mediates Axon Guidance by Regulating the Asymmetric Distribution of MIG-10/Lamellipodin  Christopher C. Quinn, Douglas S. Pfeil, William G. Wadsworth  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 808-813 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 CED-10/Rac1 Binds to MIG-10/Lamellipodin and Is Required for the Asymmetric Localization of MIG-10/Lamellipodin (A) GST fusion proteins encoding activated mutants of the Rho family GTPases (RhoL63, RacL61, and Cdc42L61) were incubated with the MIG-10 RAPH domain fused to GFP (MIG-10 RAPH::GFP). MIG-10 RAPH::GFP bound to RacL61 but not Rho L63 or Cdc42L61. (B) MIG-10 RAPH::GFP was incubated with an activated Rac mutant (RacL61) or an inactive Rac mutant (RacN17). MIG-10 RAPH::GFP bound to RacL61 but not RacN17. (C) The UNC-6/netrin guidance cue is expressed from cells located ventral to the HSN and is thought to form a chemotactic gradient that polarizes the HSN [6]. (D) In the wild-type background, MIG-10::YFP is localized to the ventral edge of the HSN. Previous work has indicated that this ventral localization is netrin dependant [6]. (E) In the ced-10(n3246) mutant background, MIG-10::YFP fails to localize to the ventral edge of the HSN neuron. (F) Average ventral enrichment of MIG-10::YFP in wild-type (n = 12) and ced-10(n3246) (n = 15) backgrounds. Asterisk indicates p < 0.0001 (Student's t test). Myristolated::GFP (MYR::GFP) was not enriched in the wild-type or ced-10(n3246) background. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Images are of collapsed stacks of optical sections. Ventral is down, and anterior is to the left. Scale bars represent 5 μm. The molecular-weight markers represent 150, 100, 75, and 50 KDa. Current Biology 2008 18, 808-813DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CED-10 Functions with MIG-10 to Orient HSN Axon Growth (A) Schematic diagram of normal HSN axon trajectory. The HSN axon makes a ventral migration and then makes an anterior turn to migrate along the ventral nerve cord. (B) Example of HSN axon in the wild-type background. (C and D) Examples of an HSN axon in a mig-10(ct41) background. In nearly all cases the axon eventually reached the ventral nerve cord. In defective axons, the axon reached the nerve cord after making a lateral migration in the anterior (example shown in [C]) or posterior (example shown in [D]) direction. (E and F) Similar defects were observed in the ced-10(n3246) mutant background. (G) Percentage of HSN axons that exhibited guidance defects. The ced-10;mig-10 double mutant was not enhanced relative to either single mutant. For all genotypes, n = 150. Error bars represent standard error of the proportion. Images represent collapsed stacks of optical sections. Ventral is down, and anterior is to the left. Scale bars represent 5 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 808-813DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MAX-2 Functions in Parallel to MIG-10/Lamellipodin to Guide the HSN Axon (A) Example of HSN axon in the max-2(cy2) null mutant background. Nearly all axons had a normal ventral migration. (B) Example of an HSN axon in the mig-10(ct41) null mutant background. Many of the axons made an abnormal lateral migration prior to making a ventral migraion. (C) Example of a max-2(cy2);mig-10(ct41) double null mutant. Many axons failed to make a ventral migration. (D) Example of an HSN axon in the unc-6(ev400) null mutant background. (E) Percentage of HSN axons that exhibited mild defects (where the HSN eventually reached the VNC) and percentage of HSN axons that exhibited severe defects (where the HSN never reached the VNC). For all genotypes, n = 150. Standard error of the proportion is shown. Images represent collapsed stacks of optical sections. Ventral is down, and anterior is to the left. Scale bars represent 5 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 808-813DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CED-10 Is Required for the Polarization of the MIG-10 Outgrowth-Promoting Activity (A) Example of an AVM neuron overexpressing MIG-10A in the wild-type background. (B) Example of an AVM neuron overexpressing MIG-10A in the ced-10(n3246) mutant background. (C) Example of an AVM neuron overexpressing MIG-10A in the ced-10(n3246); slt-1(eh15) double mutant background. (D) Percentage of GFP- or MIG-10A-overexpressing AVM neurons that had more than one process growing out of the cell body. The urEx305 transgene [5], encoding mec-4::mig-10a, was used for overexpressing MIG-10A in all experiments. For all genotypes, n = 150. Error bars represent standard error of the proportion. Images represent collapsed stacks of optical sections. Ventral is down, and anterior is to the left. Scale bars represent 5 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 808-813DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Asymmetric MIG-10 Is Associated with Asymmetric Concentrations of F-actin and Microtubules in Cultured Growth Cones (A–D) Representative example of a growth cone exhibiting asymmetric concentrations of MIG-10::GFP and double stained for F-actin and Microtubules. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (E) Analysis of actin and microtubule distribution in growth cones that exhibit asymmetric concentration of MIG-10::GFP (n = 6) and growth cones that do not exhibit asymmetric concentration of MIG-10::GFP (n = 44). Each growth cone was bisected with a line in parallel to the neurite shaft, and the ratio of actin or microtubule fluorescence was calculated. The numerator corresponded to the side of the growth cone with the highest MIG-10 fluorescence. The denominator corresponded to the side of the growth cone with the lowest MIG-10 fluorescence. An asterisk indicates significant difference relative to growth cones without asymmetric MIG-10 (p < 0.001, Student's t test). Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Current Biology 2008 18, 808-813DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions