Table 1. The comparison of government model and STWG model training

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hospital Live Delivery Captured Maternal Death
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Intermediate-level learner
Table 1. The Structure of the 9-Year Basic Education Curriculum
Hospital live Deliveries
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Nilai rata-rata total validitas
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
Table 3. Shared Governance
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 1. Students` responses
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. The Structure of the Basic Science and Technology Curriculum
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 1. The comparison of government model and STWG model training Aspect Government Model STWG Model Pariticipants Appointed by the central government All teachers member of STWG Instructor Appointed by the central government based on the certain criteria such: NS, IN, IP, and IK Decided by All teachers member of STWG, the quality of instructors is guaranted. There is a mentoring from senior teachers to yunior teachers Training Material Training material consisting of general training material, main material, and supporting material is prepared by the central government Training material is decided by teachers based on the needs of teacher Facilities Facilities is prepared by central government, such as computer, however facilities for every subject study is very limited. Facilities is decided and prepared by every Ditetapkan dan disediakan masing-masing STWG according to needs of them Method The central government prepares a guide of training for trainer to use it based on their competence and skills STWG prepares a guide of training for trainer to use it based on their competence and skills Time Time of training for all institution in all regions is decided by central government Time is decided based on the needs of member STWG in their meeting Location In big cities, participants of the training sometimes are difficult to arrive Location is decided by member STWG, where the location usually is conducted at the main school due to the completeness of the facilities Budget Budget train all teachers is expensive to The budget is relatively cheaper than the government budget because the budget is from the contribution of local government and the member of STWG Idris HM Noor et al. Strengthening Teacher’s Competence in Implementing 2013 Curriculum through Empowering the Management of Junior Secondary School (JSS) Subject Teacher Working Group (STWG). American Journal of Educational Research, 2018, Vol. 6, No. 6, 858-868. doi:10.12691/education-6-6-40 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Science and Education Publishing.