Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drug Discovery Process
Advertisements

Combination Products and Mutually Conforming Labeling David Eveleth Pfizer Inc.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Professor Stuart Walker BSc PhD MFPM FIBiol FRSC FRCPath FIstD Director CMR International UK.
+ Drug Development and Review Process. + Objectives Learn the processes involved in drug discovery and development Define the phases involved in FDA drug.
Biomedical research methods. What are biomedical research methods? An integrated approach using chemical, mathematical and computer simulations, in vitro.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 40. Marketing Authorization for New Chemical Entities Health Canada’s (HC) Therapeutic Products Directorate.
Registration in lebanon
DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DAIDS September 8, 2004 ADDRESSING THE INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES IN INTERNATIONAL VACCINE DEVELOPMENT STUART Z.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Topic: Salmeterol Group members: Yip Wing Yan(29) Yung Sin Yi(31)
Biomedical Research.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
Topics discussed in the presentation
Healthcare Improvement Scotland is supporting clinical engagement with NHS board Area Drug and Therapeutics Committees (ADTCs) to develop collaborative.
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
First Lecture By Dr. Abdelkader Ashour, Ph.D. Dr. Amira Badr, Ph.D.
The pharmaceutical R&D process
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Selection of comparators Compiled by Jan Welink WHO Workshop.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Aspects of pharmacovigilance: Post-Authorisation Efficacy Studies (PAES)
Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
The association between European Medicines Agency approval and Health Technology Assessment recommendations Iga Lipska 1,2, Anke Hövels 2, Neil McAuslane.
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication recognized or defined by the U.S. Food, Drug,
Pharmacology Science that studies interactions of drugs with organism on different levels (subcellular, cellular, organ, systemic) Studies: - relationship.
Introduction to general pharmacology.
Difference to Generics What can they do for us in the future
POST APPROVAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
Figure 3. BLA and NME Drugs Sponsored by US companies ( )
The percentage of NASs approved by CDER
Introduction to Biosimilars
NASs approval time by therapeutic area:
Median 25th and 75th percentile
Median approval time for new active substances approved by ICH agencies by approval year Methodology For each new active substance (NAS) approved between.
Comparing HTA recommendations
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
Percentage Key Message
2002–2006 Mid and Other sized companies continued to launch the majority of NMEs APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON.
Median submission gap, median approval time and percentage approved as expedited for new active substances (NASs) approved by six authorities:
Median time to internationalisation
This study was conducted using the CIRS EMaRReT database, which tracks new medicines and line extensions in 15 Emerging Markets (Argentina, Brazil, Mexico,
INTRODUCTION to Pharmacology
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in Key messages The last decade, , saw a continuation.
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
New active substances approved by EMA and FDA over 10 years
EMA: The European Medicines Agency
NME/NAS launches in 2005/6 APRIL 2007
Fundamentals of Electronic Submissions and eCTD
Rollout time breakdown: 24 common NASs in 7 jurisdictions
INTERNATIONALISATION – FOCUS ON EMA AND FDA
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
Phase 2 to phase 3 clinical trial transitions: Reasons for success and failure in immunologic diseases  Dhavalkumar D. Patel, MD, PhD, Christian Antoni,
Pipeline size of Major companies had grown at a steadier rate than that of smaller companies APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
Development time for new molecular entities first launched onto the world market between MARCH 2008 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS.
Cycle times decreased in larger but not smaller, companies
By Amany Helmy Hasanin Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacology
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Median, Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011)
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
Out of the 52 NASs approved by all six authorities during :
2019 CIRS survey: Methodologies to improve decision-making documentation during medicines development and review – gap analysis Do you think your current.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Assessment routes and timelines
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Presentation transcript:

Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval time includes EU commission time The slide shows two analyses of 70 new active substances (NASs) that were approved in the US, EU, Canada, Switzerland and Japan between 1997 and 2010:1) The median time from submission to the first of the five agencies and the time taken to be submitted to the other agencies and 2) the median approval time for the 70 NASs in each of the countries. The analysis shows that for these agencies, first submission has been to the FDA and EMA, with the time taken to submit to Canada and Switzerland being similar at around 150 to 180 days after first submission and followed by submission to Japan approximately 2.5 years later. The median approval times for the 70 NASs were 214 days in the US, 363 days in Switzerland, 406 days in Canada, 435 days in the EU and 532 days in Japan. Source: CIRS Regulatory Review Times Database. New active substances (NASs): This includes chemical, biological and radiopharmaceutical substances that have not been previously available for therapeutic use in humans to be used for the cure, alleviation, treatment, prevention or in vivo diagnosis of diseases in humans. This term also includes: An isomer, mixture of isomers, a complex or derivative or salt of a chemical substance previously available as a medicinal product but differing in properties with regard to safety and efficacy from that substance previously available; a biological substance previously available as a medicinal product, but differing in molecular structure, nature of source material or manufacturing process; a radiopharmaceutical substance that is a radionuclide or a ligand not previously available as a medicinal product. Alternatively, the coupling mechanism linking the molecule and the radionuclide has not been previously available. Applications that are excluded from the study: vaccine; any active substance that has previously been approved either by the EMA or by a member state; any other application, where new clinical data were submitted; generic applications; those applications in which a completely new dossier was submitted from a new company for the same indications as already approved for another company; and applications for a new or additional name, or a change of name, for an existing compound (i.e. a ‘cloned’ application).