Proof: [We take the negation and suppose it to be true.]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Proofs
Advertisements

PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
1 In this lecture  Number Theory ● Rational numbers ● Divisibility  Proofs ● Direct proofs (cont.) ● Common mistakes in proofs ● Disproof by counterexample.
(CSC 102) Lecture 12 Discrete Structures. Previous Lecture Summary Floor and Ceiling Functions Definition of Proof Methods of Proof Direct Proof Disproving.
Revision - Surds Production by I Porter
3.3 Divisibility Definition If n and d are integers, then n is divisible by d if, and only if, n = dk for some integer k. d | n  There exists an integer.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/31/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/11
1 Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition.
Introduction to Proofs ch. 1.6, pg. 87,93 Muhammad Arief download dari
Introduction You have learned several methods for solving polynomial equations by determining the factors, but not all equations are factorable. In this.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Methods of Proof Lecture 4: Sep 16 (chapter 3 of the book)
Mathematical Induction Assume that we are given an infinite supply of stamps of two different denominations, 3 cents and and 5 cents. Prove using mathematical.
ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
(CSC 102) Discrete Structures Lecture 10.
The Real Number System. Real Numbers The set of all rational and the set of all irrational numbers together make up the set of real numbers. Any and all.
Introduction to Proofs
1 Methods of Proof CS/APMA 202 Epp, chapter 3 Aaron Bloomfield.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 4 ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF.
Methods of Proof. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical theorems. Direct.
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
Chapter 5 Existence and Proof by contradiction
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
Proof By Contradiction Chapter 3 Indirect Argument Contradiction Theorems and pg. 171.
Fall 2008/2009 I. Arwa Linjawi & I. Asma’a Ashenkity 11 The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Introduction to Proofs.
Chapter 2 Logic 2.1 Statements 2.2 The Negation of a Statement 2.3 The Disjunction and Conjunction of Statements 2.4 The Implication 2.5 More on Implications.
Week 4 - Monday.  What did we talk about last time?  Divisibility  Quotient-remainder theorem  Proof by cases.
11/10/2015.  Copy these definitions into your notes: 1. Rational number: Any number that can be put into the form of a fraction. 2. Irrational number:
Method of proofs.  Consider the statements: “Humans have two eyes”  It implies the “universal quantification”  If a is a Human then a has two eyes.
Types of Proof Lecture 4 Sections 0.4 Wed, Aug 29, 2007.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 8 RELATIONS.
CS104:Discrete Structures Chapter 2: Proof Techniques.
Week 4 - Friday.  What did we talk about last time?  Floor and ceiling  Proof by contradiction.
Introduction to Proofs
Irrational Numbers (4.2). If the definition of a rational number is a number that can be written in the form m/n, where m and n are integers with n not.
Week 4 - Wednesday.  What did we talk about last time?  Divisibility  Proof by cases.
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
Section 2.2 More practice with Direct Proofs. Directions for Writing Proofs 1.Copy the statement of the theorem to be proved onto your paper. 2.Clearly.
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
EXAMPLE 3 Write an indirect proof Write an indirect proof that an odd number is not divisible by 4. GIVEN : x is an odd number. PROVE : x is not divisible.
Methods of Proof Lecture 4: Sep 20 (chapter 3 of the book, except 3.5 and 3.8)
CS 173, Lecture B August 27, 2015 Tandy Warnow. Proofs You want to prove that some statement A is true. You can try to prove it directly, or you can prove.
Proof Techniques CS160/CS122 Rosen: 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
The Relation Induced by a Partition
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/17
Direct Proof and Counterexample III: Divisibility
Indirect Argument: Two Classical Theorems
Direct Proof by Contraposition Direct Proof by Contradiction
Equations with variables on both sides Whiteboard practice
Methods of Proof CS 202 Epp, chapter 3.
The Pythagorean Theorem
The sum of any two even integers is even.
Indirect Proof by Contradiction Direct Proof by Cases
PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Methods of Proof Rosen 1.7, 1.8 Lecture 4: Sept 24, 25.
Elementary Number Theory & Proofs
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
Equations with variables on both sides Whiteboard practice
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Examples of Mathematical Proof
Rational and Irrational numbers
Classifying Real numbers
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Methods of Proof Rosen 1.7, 1.8 Lecture 4: Sept, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Proof: [We take the negation and suppose it to be true.] √2 is irrational. Proof: [We take the negation and suppose it to be true.]

Suppose √2 is rational. √2 = m/n Then there are integers m and n with no common factors such that √2 = m/n Definition of a rational number (3.2, 141) [by dividing m and n by any common factor would do it].

Squaring both sides of the equation gives 2 = m2/n2 Or, equivalently, m2 = 2n2 Note that this implies that m2 is even (why?) It follows that m is even (why? Prop. 3.6.4, 176) [We file this away for future reference.]

We deduce that m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2 = 2n2. n2 = 2k2 m = 2k for some integer k. Substituting m = 2k into m2 = 2n2, we see that m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2 = 2n2. Dividing both sides of 4k2 = 2n2 by 2 yields n2 = 2k2

Consequently, n2 is even, and so n is even. But we also know that m is even. [We filed this away.] Hence, both m and n have a common factor of 2. But this is a contradiction. Our supposition was that m and n had no common factors. Therefore the supposition is false and so the theorem is true.