Exp. 3A real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations peeling and reapplying electrodes during stimulation. Exp. 3A.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Human PBMC-derived MERS-CoV–specific T cells are multifunctional.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Pneumatic oscillator driven by an air source of constant pressure.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Results from exp. 2 validating the controller.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Fluorescence properties of MSP.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Examples of organism-based systems.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

Translation of a spherical object.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Block diagram for our controller that modulates stimulation parameters to keep perceived sensation intensity constant. Block diagram for our controller.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Variability in sensation intensity due to changes in impedance during electrotactile stimulation. Variability in sensation intensity due to changes in.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Results from exp. 1 modeling the relationship of peak resistance (Rp) to peak pulse energy (Ep) and phase charge (Q) at constant sensation intensity. Results.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Underwater observatory.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Fig. 1 Histograms of the number of first messages received by men and women in each of our four cities. Histograms of the number of first messages received.

Exp. 3B real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations using a prosthesis with electrotactile touch feedback during.

Examples of organic sensing in robotics.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Fig. 1 Size fractions of MPPs in different fertilizers.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Fig. 4 Spatial mapping of the distribution and intensity of industrial fishing catch. Spatial mapping of the distribution and intensity of industrial fishing.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Fig. 3 Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented memory. Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Exp. 3A real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations peeling and reapplying electrodes during stimulation. Exp. 3A real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations peeling and reapplying electrodes during stimulation. Upon stimulation with and without the controller, the participants were asked to peel back and reapply the electrodes within 10 s by 25, 50, and 75%, pausing for 5 s in between. (A and B) Rp increases as the electrodes were peeled back. (C and D) I and (E and F) T remain constant when the controller is not used but are modulated in response to changes in Rp when the controller is used. In both cases, (G and H) mE remains constant because it does not depend on Rp. In (I) and (J), mQ varies greatly when the controller is not use. When the controller is in use, I and T are modulated to keep mQ constant. The participants reported no change in sensation intensity when using the controller, but reported discomfort when peeling back the electrodes without the controller. The means and SDs for both participants over five trials are shown. Aadeel Akhtar et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaap9770 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works