Selection of priority sectors for CBE development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIGHLIGHTS ON ICT POLICY FOR BASIC EDUCATION
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
CONTEXT OF LITHUANIAN VALLEYS IN SMART SPECIALIZATION Ramojus Reimeris Janas Mateika, Battle of Grunwald, 1878.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Expert Input : Review of Days 1 & 2 1. Forum Days 1 & 2 2 Overview of Days’ 1 & 2 Themes, Sessions, and Guiding Questions.
Logistics and supply chain strategy planning
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
The Lithuanian R&I Ecosystem Jurgita Petrauskienė, MOSTA A new Ecology of Competition.
Baiba Rivza professor, Latvia.  It is important to have the vision, especially in the time of economic downturn, both,  in a national level ( Latvian.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Launched March at UN Statistical Commission in side event.
Advancing Quality Partnerships
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Priorities for the Success AT Strategic Action Plan: SUMMARY
Vision Statement: Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and.
Developing reporting system for SDG and Agenda 2063, contribution of National Statistical System, issues faced and challenges CSA Ethiopia.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Priorities and coordination of capacity building in Azerbaijan
SNOMED CT Education SIG: Strategic Plan Review
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
A Partnership Model: African Mineral Skills Initiative
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
ROLE AND MANDATE In terms of the National Development Agency (NDA) Act (Act No 108 of 1998 as amended), NDA was mandated to contribute towards the eradication.
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards
CQ WORKSHOPS 2 staff workshops on ‘Course Quality’ (June & Sept 2017)
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Vision Facilitation Template
The Systemic Enrollment Management Matrix (SEM²) and Student Success Planning Oscar Joseph III, Ph.D., D. Mgt. Chief Enrollment Management Officer League.
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
Stellenbosch University
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
Launch of Towards 2020 GWP Strategy.
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Service Development at Aalto University Key Enabler for Aalto's Academic Mission Mari Svahn.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
IEEE EAB Strategy 19 June 2011 New Brunswick, NJ.
AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES BY YEAR 2030
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Increasing Success in Life for All
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation of the Slovak Republic Mgr. Martin Svoboda
An Introduction to LiFE
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication
I4.0 in Action The importance of people and culture in the Industry 4.0 transformation journey Industry 4.0 Industry 3.0 Industry 2.0 Industry 1.0 Cyber.
Innovation policy for sustainable development by Azerbaijan Rashad Azizov Head of Innovational Development Department Ministry of Transport, Communication.
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

Selection of priority sectors for CBE development Gintautas Jakštas Baku, 2018 July

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Smart specialization What is Smart specialisation? The process: From analysis to implementation Priorities in Lithuania Azerbaijan strategic road map Competency-based Education

Smart Specialisation

What is Smart specialization?

Priority implementation plans The process: From analysis to implementation 1 6 broad Priority fields Priority field Analysis of challenges, research potential and structure of economy 2 Priorities 20 Priorities within 6 broad Priority fields In-depth analysis in every Priority field + expert panels 3 Roadmaps For every Priority (total 20 roadmaps) Expert panels + broad survey Priority implementation plans Developed according to roadmaps (total 20 plans) 4 Consultation with National expert institutions + implementing ministries

Priorities in Lithuania Agro-innovation and food technologies Safer food and sustainable usage of biomaterials Functional food Innovative development, improvement and processing of biological raw materials (biorefinery)   Energy and sustainable environment Smart systems for energy efficiency, diagnostic, monitoring, metering and management of generators, grids and customers Energy and fuel production using biomass/waste and waste treatment, storage and disposal Technology for the development and use of smart low-energy buildings – digital construction Solar energy installations and technologies for using them for the power generation , heating and cooling Health technologies and biotechnology Molecular technologies for medicine and biopharmaceutics Advanced applied technologies for individual and public health Advanced medical engineering for early diagnostics and treatment Inclusive and creative society Modern self-development technologies and processes promoting formation of creative and productive individuals Technologies and processes for the development and implementation of breakthrough innovations   Novel production processes, materials and technologies Photonic and laser technologies Functional materials and coatings Structural and composite materials Flexible technological systems for product development and fabrication Transport, logistics and information and communication technologies Advanced electronic content, content development technologies and information interoperability ICT infrastructure, cloud computing solutions and services Smart transport systems and ICT Technologies/models for the international transport corridors’ management and integration of modes of transport

Smart specialization platform Platform enables public managers and stakeholders to position their territory in comparison to other territories and to find potential partners for collaboration. Inside the EU. National Smart specialization priorities are used in research financing, selection of national projects. Based on national priorities institutional priorities are shaped.

Azerbaijan Strategic Road map

Azerbaijan strategic road map In late 2016, the President approved a strategic roadmap for economic reforms that identified key non-energy segments of the economy for development, such as agriculture, logistics, information technology, and tourism. 12 Strategic Roadmaps Endorsed in Azerbaijan aim to define the country`s development goals and priorities and ensure their implementation Well developed methodology: Primary objectives Analysis of current situation Global trends Potential Primary market opportunities SWOT analysis of sector Strategic vision 2020 Long term vision for 2025 Target Indicators, Strategic Objectives and Targets, Financial Mechanism Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation

STRATEGIC ROAD MAP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SECTORS IN THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN Tourism SWOT analysis, weaknesses: Training of skilled workers does not meet labor market requirements both from quality and quantity perspectives; Relatively less foreign language speakers in regions. Agricultural products SWOT analysis weaknesses: low fertility indices as a result of narrow dissemination of the implementation practice of advanced farming methods, great role of extensive factors in growth of production of most products. inadequate knowledge and skills of farmers in relevant fields to carry out activities with advanced methods; SWOT analysis of logistics and trade sector, weaknesses: small potential for qualified personnel in logistics; low labor productivity.

Competency-based Education

ELEMENTS OF QUALITY FOR COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION by Competency-based Education Network In order to produce a high-quality CBE program, the institution must build a foundational infrastructure in support of competency-based education. This includes the development of a CBE philosophy and commitment as it relates to the institution’s mission, the design of the program structure and the definition of appropriate supports for the program and its learners Each competency is explicitly stated and provides unambiguous descriptions of what a learner must master to complete a program of study. Each competency includes the theory and the application of theory required for mastery at the appropriate level for the credential being earned Competency-based education programs use an intentional and transparent approach to curricular design that provides a learner with the full range of competencies necessary to meet post-graduation demands. This academic model, which provides clear pathways to completion, builds a unified body of knowledge that leverages frameworks, disciplines, standards, national norms and workforce Authentic assessments and their corresponding rubrics are key components of CBE, which is anchored by the belief that progress toward a credential should be determined by what learners know and are able to do. The overarching assessment strategy is comprised of assessments designed both to inform the learning journey and to validate mastery CBE professionals (faculty and staff) comprehensively understand the strengths and needs of their target learner population, and put those needs at the core of all decisions, processes and systems. CBE programs offer proactive and personalized support for learners, from determining program fit through alumni relations. Faculty and staff are invested in and involved with understanding and improving the entire learner lifecycle by designing, guiding and supporting the learning journey, including processes that facilitate and encourage meaningful interaction with individual learners. A full array of wraparound learner services and social supports, appropriate to the learners being served, is offered by CBE professionals through a wide range of roles and responsibilities Institutions strategically identify and secure the commitment of multiple external partners to inform and support the achievement of their CBE programs’ purpose and their institutional equity goals. External partners are meaningfully engaged in the design, delivery and evaluation of the institutions’ CBE programs. They work collaboratively to inform and validate CBE program competencies and curriculum, and to ensure the authenticity of assessments. The result is a relevant, transparent credential and authentic learning experience that is endorsed and trusted by external partners as well as learners. One of the central differentiators of CBE programs is their transparency regarding the learning required to earn a credential. This means that the competencies and their alignment, the pathway to mastering those competencies, the assessment methodologies and the performance requirements for successful demonstration of competency are clearly articulated to learners and all other stakeholders. An evidence-driven, continuous improvement methodology is an essential dimension of competency-based education. To ensure program effectiveness, data are collected and analyzed at regular intervals during the program and post-completion. These data are reported and used to inform learners and faculty, identify and prioritize improvements, evaluate and refine assessment strategy and implementation, monitor learner achievement across diverse groups. Where performance gaps are identified, the institution actively implements and monitors solutions.

Economy sectors: Employment and GDP In Agriculture sector work 37 percent workers and generate 6 percent of GDP In Services work 49 percent workers and generate 42 percent of GDP In industry work only 14 percent of workers and this sector generates 52 percent of GDP Manufacture of tobacco products 2010: 0,6% pop – 0,08% GDP, 2016: 0,3% pop – 0,14% GDP Metallurgy industry 2010: 8,3% pop – 0,5% GDP, 2016: 3,9% pop – 1% GDP Manufacture of food products 2010: 15,1% pop – 1,5% GDP, 2016: 18,8% pop – 4,3% GDP Manufacture of rubber and plastics products 2010: 4% pop – 0,2% GDP, 2016: 5,5% pop – 0,6% GDP Inner Circle - Share of economic sectors in the GDP, 2016 Outer Circe - Distribution of employment by economic sector, 2016

Selection of priority sectors for the development of competence-based education standards Capacity National priorities CBE priorities My task is to suggest three priority areas for the improvement of competence-based education standards on the basis of economic and social relevance. One possbile way to do it is to analyze current situation of economic sectors and performance of graduates. However we couldn‘t find oficial data with graduates emplyment indicators on program level. Onother posible way is to adopt priority sectors from Azerbaijan strategic road map. Center for analysisof economic reforms and communication analysed sectors, identified weaknesses and development of competence based education stadards can be helpfull to overcome those challenges. Knowing that implementing CBE model requires a huge input from universities, in order to succed it is essential to select priority programs where are the highest level of excellence both from teachers and administration in universities. So my suggestion would be to select priority sectors based on national priorities and capacity of universities.