The Milgram Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“First They Came for the Jews” By Pastor Martin Niemöller
Advertisements

Milgram Experiment By Sean Shtofman.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of Obedience.
Warm up! 1.Stand up 2.Shake the hand of the person next to you 3.Sit down 4.Clap your hands together five times 5.Moo like a cow.
Two Minutes Hate Discuss: What is Two Minutes Hate? What is the purpose? How does Winston feel about it? How do others seem to feel about it?
Why do we obey authority?
Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying. How far do you think people will go in the name of obedience?
AP Psychology.  What is obedience?  Who do we obey?  Why do we obey?  What would you do if a person of authority asked you do something illegal? 
Social Psychology Lecture 14 Obedience and deindividuation Jane Clarbour Room: PS/B007 jc129.
Obedience to Authority. What Makes People Obey Authority? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Who else do you obey?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments Mr. Koch AP Psychology Forest Lake High School Obedience = changing behavior in response to a demand.
Understanding Ethics in Psychology
Obedience Why do we obey?. Why do we obey orders that we know are immoral or wrong? Germans who helped kill Jews in Europe. Serbs who killed Muslims in.
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE
The Milgram Experiment. The Milgram Experiment was a series of social psychology experiments conducted in the early 1960s by Yale University psychologist.
Contributor© POSbase 2005 Obedience to Authority Obviously, Nazi criminals were not monsters, but normal citizens and caring fathers who were willing to.
The Milgram Obedience Experiment The Perils of Obedience "The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind.
Stanley Milgram “The Obedience Experiment”. Milgram’s background Completed his undergraduate degree at Queens College in Political Science Went to Harvard.
Human Subjects’ Research. Learning Objectives Discuss key ethical concerns The role of the IRB Principles and origin of Belmont Report Principle of informed.
“Ordinary People” Doing Evil
Can people be forced to do something against their will? Have you ever? How?
Meeus and Raaijmaker (1986). Background Meeus and Raaijmakers were critical of Milgram’s research. They thought parts of it were ambiguous – for example,
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE
Obedience to Authority “The Final Solution”. The Holocaust “The Nazi extermination of European Jews is the most extreme instance of abhorrent immoral.
Adolf Eichmann. What is this man famous for? What do you think we will be looking at this lesson?
Introduction to Psychology Social Psychology Prof. Jan Lauwereyns
3 The Influence of Other People on Attitudes and Behaviour GV917.
ADAPTED FROM SIMPLYPSYCHOLOGY The Milgram Experiment.
AS level Psychology The core studies The Social Approach.
Obedience.
Milgram, obedience & environmental determinism
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
Stanley Milgram 1962, In Milgram’s Own Words What was Milgram’s motive for studying obedience to authority?
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
What is obedience? Lesson 2 – Social Learning Unit 2 – Understanding other people.
The MILGRAM Experiment Molly Marshall. Milgram's Question... Why do we obey authority? What conditions foster obedience? What conditions foster independent.
The Psychology of Evil How far will people go in the name of obedience?
Another inconvenient truth Are YOU capable of cold blooded murder?
The Ethical Responsibilities of Scientists Lesson 2.
FINALIZE MYTHBUSTING Score Worksheets. SECRETS OF THE PSYCHICS Correct Worksheets.
Conformity. Results Even though the correct answer was always obvious, the average subject conformed to the group response on 32% of the trials and 74%
Social Psychology Miss Bird
Rewind Finalize Mythbusting – 7th Period Begin Myth 2
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE
Stanley Milgram.
Obedience to Authority: An Experiment by Stanley Milgram
Milgram Experiment.
Factors affecting obedience
At the end of WW2 people were asking the question ‘what made so many German people act in such atrocious ways?’ Why did the holocaust happen? Are the.
Bellwork On a sheet of paper, write out a step by step description of Milgram’s experimental design.
“The Obedience Experiment”
Conformity and Obedience
Obedience Today.
CONFORMITY AND OBEDIENCE
The Milgram Experiment
In 1962, the world was wondering – again - why? and how?
How far will people go in the name of obedience?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments
Obedience: Milgram’s Research
Obedience Obedience compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience.
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
How far will people go in the name of obedience?
The Milgram Experiment
Component 2: Psychological themes through core studies
Meeus and Raaijmakers (1986)
Presentation transcript:

The Milgram Experiment Obedience to Authority

Introduction Stanley Milgram – Yale University psychologist Experiments began in July 1961 (Three months after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem) Milgram wanted to answer the question: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”

Eichmann in Jerusalem court. “The Architect of the Holocaust” Transportation Administrator to the Final Solution Managed all trains to transport Jews to ghettos and killing centers 1944 – Sent 430,000 Hungarians to gas chambers after the Final Solution was halted Fled to Argentina Captured in 1960 Hanged in 1962 Eichmann in Jerusalem court.

The Experiment Roles Three people take part in the experiment: “experimenter”, “learner” (“victim”) and “teacher” The “experimenter” – a stern biology teacher dressed in a grey technician’s coat The “learner” – a 47 year old actor The “teacher” – volunteer told he was participating in an experiment in the study of memory and learning in different situations

The Experiment Steps 1. The actor and volunteer choose a slip of paper. 2. Both slips say “teacher” ensuring the volunteer gets the right role 3. The actor claims to have the “learner” slip and they separate into two rooms 4. The “teacher” (volunteer) is given an electric shock as a sample of what the learner would receive 5. The “teacher” is given a list of word pairs to teach the learner

Public Announcement for Experiment

The Experiment Steps Cont. 6. The “teacher” read the word pairs to the “learner” 7. The “teacher” then read the first word of each pair and gave four possible answers (the “learner” indicated his answer by pressing a button) 8. If the answer was incorrect, the “teacher” was to administer an electric shock The voltage would increase 15 volts for each wrong answer If correct, the teacher would read the next word pair

Experiment Diagram

Electric Shock Apparatus & Volunteer

The “Learner’s” Response The “learner” never received the shocks A tape recorder played prerecorded sounds of suffering for each shock level After a number of voltage increases the actor would bang on the wall After several times banging on the wall and complaining about a heart condition, he would stop responding (faking death)

Ending the Experiment If the “teacher” wanted to stop the experiment, the experimenter gave a succession of verbal prods: (1) Please continue. (2) The experiment requires that you continue. (3) It is absolutely essential that you continue. (4) You have no other choice, you must go on. Experiment ended: (1) If the “teacher” wanted to stop after all four prods (2) After the teacher had given the max. 450 volt shock

The “Teacher’s” Responses Some test subjects paused after 135 volts and questioned experiment Some desired to check on the “learner” Most continued after they were assured they would not be held responsible Few subjects began to laugh nervously and show extreme signs of stress

Percentage Results Fourteen Yale senior-year psych majors polled Poll Before Experiment Actual Results Fourteen Yale senior-year psych majors polled Few (average 1.2%) of volunteers would inflict maximum voltage First set of experiments at Yale – 65% (26 of 40) inflicted the maximum voltage Experiment repeated around the world – 61-66%

Other Results None of volunteers who refused to administer final shocks insisted that the experiment itself be terminated None left the room to check the health of the victim Experiment raised questions about the ethics of scientific experimentation 84% of former volunteers were “glad” to have participated

Journal 1. Do you believe that the Milgram experiment was ethical? 2. Were you surprised by the results? 3. Can you better understand how and why Germans and others did not do more to stop the Holocaust? Do you believe that those that did not help the Jews were accomplices to the Final Solution?