Interactions with the Abelson Tyrosine Kinase Reveal Compartmentalization of Eyes Absent Function between Nucleus and Cytoplasm  Wenjun Xiong, Noura M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Advertisements

Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Drosophila Melted Modulates FOXO and TOR Activity
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Circadian Pacemaker Neurons Transmit and Modulate Visual Information to Control a Rapid Behavioral Response  Esteban O. Mazzoni, Claude Desplan, Justin.
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Repulsive Axon Guidance
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Eyes Absent Mediates Cross-Talk between Retinal Determination Genes and the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Pathway  Francis C. Hsiao, Andrina Williams,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
PP2A Regulatory Subunit PP2A-B′ Counteracts S6K Phosphorylation
Eric J. Rulifson, Chi-Hwa Wu, Roel Nusse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Qiong Wang, Mirka Uhlirova, Dirk Bohmann  Developmental Cell 
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Control of Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Eye by Notch Signaling
Susi, a Negative Regulator of Drosophila PI3-Kinase
Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Interactions between a Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase and a Cell Surface Ligand Regulate Axon Guidance and Glial-Neuronal Communication  Hyung-Kook (Peter)
Julian C. Boggiano, Pamela J. Vanderzalm, Richard G. Fehon 
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
Thomas J. Klein, Andreas Jenny, Alexandre Djiane, Marek Mlodzik 
PHYL Acts to Down-Regulate TTK88, a Transcriptional Repressor of Neuronal Cell Fates, by a SINA-Dependent Mechanism  Amy H Tang, Thomas P Neufeld, Elaine.
Masako Tamada, Dene L. Farrell, Jennifer A. Zallen  Developmental Cell 
Lisa Connell-Crowley, Maude Le Gall, Duc J. Vo, Edward Giniger 
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Control of a Kinesin-Cargo Linkage Mechanism by JNK Pathway Kinases
Mask Proteins Are Cofactors of Yorkie/YAP in the Hippo Pathway
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Interactions with the Abelson Tyrosine Kinase Reveal Compartmentalization of Eyes Absent Function between Nucleus and Cytoplasm  Wenjun Xiong, Noura M. Dabbouseh, Ilaria Rebay  Developmental Cell  Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 271-279 (February 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genetic Interactions Reveal Cooperativity between eya and abl (A) Altered abl dosage dominantly modifies Eya's ectopic eye induction efficiency. Lines 1–4 are independent transgenic lines; lof, loss of function; gof, gain of function; kd, kinase dead; n, number scored; NR, none recovered; %EE, percent of flies of genotype kinase/+; dpp-Gal4 > UAS-Eya with ectopic eye tissue on head. (B) Reduced eya dosage impairs viability of abl mutant embryos. N, number of animals scored. (C–G) Dissected ventral nerve cords from stage-16 embryos stained with BP102 to reveal the pattern of the axon scaffold. (C) Wild-type. (D) abl2 homozygotes have intact commissures. (E) eyaA188 homozygotes are indistinguishable from wild-type. (F) eyaA188/+, abl2 mutant embryos have discontinuities along the longitudinal axon bundles with 20% of commissures lost or defective. (G) In eyaA188;abl2 double homozygotes, 77% of commissures are lost, and the longitudinal tracts show severe disruptions. Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Eya and Abl Are Required for Photoreceptor Axon Targeting in the Brain (A–L) Dissected eye-brain complexes from third-instar larvae stained with (A–D and I–L) anti-chaoptin 24B10 or with (E–H) anti-β-galactosidase to visualize the R2–R5-specific Ro-lacZtau marker. (A and E) In wild-type, R1–R6 axons form a normal lamina plexus, and R7 and R8 axons are arranged in regular staggered rows within the medulla. R2–R5 axons mostly stop in the lamina. (B and F) In abl1/abl2 trans-heterozygotes, the lamina plexus is discontinuous, with gaps in the plexus, and thicker axon bundles beneath. A subset of R2–R5 axons fail to stop in the lamina and extend into the medulla. (C and G) eya2/eyaA188 mutants phenocopy abl mutants. (D and H) eya A188/+; abl mutants have a highly disorganized lamina, with thick bundles of R2–R5 axons failing to stop in the lamina. (I–L) MARCM clones of eya and abl labeled with 24B10 (red). GFP, green, marks the mutant axons. (I–I″) Photoreceptor axons of large wild-type clones ([I], inset) exhibit normal targeting to the brain. (J–J″) Axonal projections appear normal in small abl clones. Targeting of wild-type axons to mutant brain tissue appears normal ([J′], insets). (K–K″) Larger abl clones show fasciculation defects and laminar gaps. (L–L″) Wild-type axons exhibit normal targeting to eya mutant brain tissue. Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Eya and Abl Interact in Postmitotic Photoreceptor Cells to Regulate Axon Targeting (A–I) Dissected eye-brain complexes from third-instar larvae stained with anti-β-galactosidase to visualize the Ro-LacZtau marker. (A) GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/+ controls show a few thin overshooting bundles. (B) UAS-EyaRNAi/+; GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/+ larvae have significant mistargeting defects. (C) UAS-AblRNAi/+; GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/+ was similar to control. (D) Double knockdown of abl and eya (UAS-EyaRNAi, UAS-AblRNAi/+; GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/+) causes multiple thick axon bundles to overshoot the lamina. (E) Increased Eya expression (UAS-Eya/GMR-Gal4; Ro-lacZtau/+) causes targeting defects. (F) Reduced abl expression suppresses Eya overexpression phenotypes (UAS-AblRNAi/+; UAS-Eya/GMR-Gal4; Ro-lacZtau/+). (G) Increased cytoplasmic Eya perturbs axon targeting (GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/UAS-Myr-EyaWT). (H) Expression of phosphatase-dead Myr-tagged Eya (GMR-Gal4/+; Ro-lacZtau/UAS-Myr-EyaK699Q) shows only mild targeting defects. (I) Reduced abl expression suppresses Myr-EyaWT phenotypes (UAS-AblRNAi/+; UAS-Myr-EyaWT/GMR-Gal4; Ro-lacZtau/+). (J) Summary of the average number of overshooting axon bundles per brain for each genotype ± standard deviation. Scoring was performed blind to the genotype. n, number of brains scored. Statistical significance (p values) were calculated by using Excel's built-in TTEST function after performing an unpaired, one-tailed t test for each pair of genotypes. All phenotypes were significant compared to control (p < 0.001) except that of AblRNAi (†). P values for other relevant comparison pairs are indicated next to brackets. Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Eya Is a Substrate of Abl (A–D and F) Immunoblots of immunoprecipitated Flag-Eya double labeled with anti-Flag (red) and anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-pY) (green). Reduced sensitivity of anti-Flag relative to anti-pY may explain the lack of complete overlap (yellow) of the two signals. (A) In transiently transfected S2 cells, the Eya pY signal increases in the presence of Abl. (B) Treatment with λ phosphatase removes the pY signal. (C) Actin-Gal4-driven coexpression of AblWT, but not kinase-dead AblKD, increases tyrosine phosphorylation of Flag-Eya in embryos. (D) GMR-Gal4-driven coexpression of Abl increases tyrosine phosphorylation of Flag-Eya in third-instar eye discs. (E) Schematic of Eya deletion constructs. (F) Abl primarily targets the PST-rich region of Eya. Lane numbering matches the construct number in (E). Molecular weight (MW) standards are indicated in Kd on the left. Arrowheads on the right point out IgG bands. Asterisks indicate constructs run with expected mobility in the absence of Abl. (G) In vitro kinase assay with recombinant mammalian c-Abl. Coomassie staining in the left panel shows fusion protein amounts. The right panel shows the phosphoimager exposure of the same blot showing the signal in the GST-EyaPST lane. (H) In vitro kinase assays with immunoprecipitated Myc-tagged Drosophila Abl from transfected S2 cells phosphorylates GST-EyaPST. Left panel, Coomassie stain; middle panel, phosphoimager exposure of same blot. Right panels show that immunoprecipitated kinase-dead Abl (KD) does not phosphorylate GST-EyaPST: top, Coomassie; middle, P32 exposure; bottom, anti-Myc immunoblot; the quantitation of relative intensity of signals is indicated. Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Abl Expression Relocalizes Eya to the Cytoplasm (A–D′) Indirect immunofluorescence of transfected S2 cells stained with anti-Flag to recognize Flag-Eya and/or anti-Myc to detect Abl-Myc. (A) Eya is predominantly nuclear, although cytoplasmic staining can be seen. (B) Abl localizes to the cytoplasm with enrichment at the plasma membrane. (C–D) Cells coexpressing Eya and Abl double labeled with (C and D) anti-Flag and (C′ and D′) anti-Myc. (C and C′) Example of an Abl-expressing cell with uniform distribution of Eya. (D–D′) Example of an Abl-expressing cell with exclusive cytoplasmic Eya localization and membrane enrichment. (E) Quantitation of Eya localization. Approximately 300 cells were counted for each condition. (F–H) Anti-Eya staining of wing imaginal discs coexpressing Eya and Abl transgenes with Ptc-Gal4. (F–G) Different optical sections of the same disc coexpressing Eya and Abl reveals expression of Eya in both (F) cytoplasm and (G) nucleus. (H) No cytoplasmic localization was detected upon coexpression of Eya and kinase-dead AblKD. Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Coexpression of Membrane-Tethered and Nuclearly Restricted Eya Reveals a Cytoplasmic Requirement for Eya Phosphatase Activity (A) Average activities of Eya transgenes in the ectopic eye induction assay (see Table S1 for details). n, number of transgenic lines tested; N, total number of flies scored. (B) Average activities of Eya transgenes in the genetic rescue assay (see Table S2 for details). n, number of transgenic lines tested; N, total number of flies scored. (C–F) Adult heads representative of eyeless phenotype of eya2, modest rescue by NLS-EyaWT, strong rescue by coexpressed NLS-EyaWT + Myr-EyaWT, and modest rescue by coexpressed NLS-EyaWT + Myr-EyaK699Q. (G) Average ectopic eye induction efficiency of recombinant lines obtained by systematic crossing of four NLS-EyaWT lines with multiple Myr-EyaWT and Myr-EyaK699Q transgenes (see Table S3 for details). n, number of independent recombinant lines tested; N, total number of flies scored; the Student's t test was applied to determine the p values between groups. No significant difference is determined between NLS-EyaWT and NLS-EyaWT + Myr-EyaK699Q (p = 0.48). Developmental Cell 2009 16, 271-279DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions