Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2019)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scaffold Download free viewer:
Advertisements

Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
Lawrence J. Jennings, Maria E
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Detection of Exon 12 Mutations in the JAK2 Gene
Comparison of Clinical Targeted Next-Generation Sequence Data from Formalin-Fixed and Fresh-Frozen Tissue Specimens  David H. Spencer, Jennifer K. Sehn,
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Low Dimensionality in Gene Expression Data Enables the Accurate Extraction of Transcriptional Programs from Shallow Sequencing  Graham Heimberg, Rajat.
Matan Goldshtein, David B. Lukatsky  Biophysical Journal 
A Method to Evaluate the Quality of Clinical Gene-Panel Sequencing Data for Single- Nucleotide Variant Detection  Chung Lee, Joon S. Bae, Gyu H. Ryu, Nayoung.
Improving Mutation Screening in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Predisposition Using Next-Generation Sequencing  Jean-Marc Rey, Vincent Ducros, Pascal.
Ruth B. McCole, Jelena Erceg, Wren Saylor, Chao-ting Wu  Cell Reports 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Application of Single-Molecule Amplification and Resequencing Technology for Broad Surveillance of Plasma Mutations in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Application of Single-Molecule Amplification and Resequencing Technology for Broad Surveillance of Plasma Mutations in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Christopher R. Cabanski, Vincent Magrini, Malachi Griffith, Obi L
Detection of Discrepant Driver Mutations in a Patient with Two Synchronous Primary Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs) with Liquid Biopsy  Sotirios Lakis,
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Quantitative Measurement of Cell-Free Plasma DNA and Applications for Detecting Tumor Genetic Variation and Promoter Methylation in a Clinical Setting 
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
A Tumor Sorting Protocol that Enables Enrichment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells and Facilitation of Genetic Analyses  Zachary S. Boyd, Rajiv Raja,
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
A Rapid and Sensitive Next-Generation Sequencing Method to Detect RB1 Mutations Improves Care for Retinoblastoma Patients and Their Families  Wenhui L.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
Detection of Exon 12 Mutations in the JAK2 Gene
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Whole genome characterization of hepatitis B virus quasispecies with massively parallel pyrosequencing  F. Li, D. Zhang, Y. Li, D. Jiang, S. Luo, N. Du,
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Modeling Enzyme Processivity Reveals that RNA-Seq Libraries Are Biased in Characteristic and Correctable Ways  Nathan Archer, Mark D. Walsh, Vahid Shahrezaei,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Figure 1. Plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay workflow, comparison of variant allelic fraction with ... Figure 1. Plasma next-generation sequencing.
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (August 2018)
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Modeling Enzyme Processivity Reveals that RNA-Seq Libraries Are Biased in Characteristic and Correctable Ways  Nathan Archer, Mark D. Walsh, Vahid Shahrezaei,
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Network-Based Coverage of Mutational Profiles Reveals Cancer Genes
Peiyong Jiang, K.C. Allen Chan, Y.M. Dennis Lo
Qian Cong, Dominika Borek, Zbyszek Otwinowski, Nick V. Grishin 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Mutational Analysis of Ionizing Radiation Induced Neoplasms
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e4 (May 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 132-144.e3 (July 2019) Ultra-Sensitive TP53 Sequencing for Cancer Detection Reveals Progressive Clonal Selection in Normal Tissue over a Century of Human Lifespan  Jesse J. Salk, Kaitlyn Loubet-Senear, Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Charles C. Valentine, Lindsey N. Williams, Jacob E. Higgins, Reinhard Horvat, Adriaan Vanderstichele, Daniela Nachmanson, Kathryn T. Baker, Mary J. Emond, Emily Loter, Maria Tretiakova, Thierry Soussi, Lawrence A. Loeb, Robert Zeillinger, Paul Speiser, Rosa Ana Risques  Cell Reports  Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 132-144.e3 (July 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109 Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using UL and DS (A) UL is carried out by passing a small catheter through the cervix, followed by concurrent flushing and aspiration with 10 mL of saline. (B) After cell isolation by centrifugation, DNA is extracted, fragmented, and ligated with DS adapters, which include degenerate molecular tags (α and β). Following amplification, hybrid capture, and sequencing, reads sharing the same tags are grouped and mutations are scored only if present in both strands of each original DNA molecule. (C and D) Each spot on the 2D surface represents one of the 1,179 coding positions in TP53. The y axis indicates mutant allele frequency (MAF). By standard NGS, all positions show false mutations (C). DS of the same sample (case 6 in E) eliminates errors and reveals only true mutations (D). (E and F) TP53 mutations identified by DS in UL from women with ovarian cancer (E) and women who are cancer-free (controls; F). Fuchsia bars, matching tumor mutation; blue bars, biological background mutations. Mutations are sorted by ascending MAF within each patient and patients are sorted by age. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Frequency of TP53 Mutations in UL Increases with Age Frequency is calculated as the total number of unique TP53 mutations identified in each sample (including exons and flanking intronic regions) divided by the total number of DS nucleotides sequenced. (A) UL samples from patients with ovarian cancer; n = 10, r = 0.89, p = 0.0006 by Spearman’s correlation test. (B) UL samples from control patients without cancer; n = 11, r = 0.83, p = 0.001 by Spearman’s correlation test. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Evidence of Positive Selection in TP53 Background Mutations from ULs (A–D) Percentage of non-synonymous TP53 mutations (A), and percentage of TP53 mutations localized in CpG dinucleotides (B), in exons 5–8 (C), and in hotspot codons (D). For (A–D), TP53 mutations identified in UL from controls and cancer significantly exceed expected values without selection. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.0001 by binomial exact test, n = 79 for UL controls, and n = 33 for UL cancer. (E and F) Protein activity (E) and predicted pathogenicity (F) color-coded as five groups from Seshat data. Patients are sorted by ascending age. For each patient, TP53 mutation frequency is calculated as the number of mutations in the coding region divided by the total number of DS nucleotides sequenced in that region. Two cancer patients with unusually low sequencing depth and no identified TP53 mutations are not shown. Nearly all cases and controls carry mutations that have an impact on protein activity and predicted pathogenicity. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TP53 Mutations in UL Are Very Similar to TP53 Mutations Found in Human Cancers (A) Traits of positive selection are compared between all of the possible mutations in the TP53 coding region (no selection; n = 3,546), TP53 background mutations found in UL (n = 112), and TP53 mutations reported in the UMD cancer database (n = 71,051). (B) UL mutations in cases and controls color-coded by their abundance in the UMD TP53 database. For each sample, TP53 mutation frequency is calculated as the number of mutations in the coding region divided by the total number of DS nucleotides sequenced in that region. Most samples harbor TP53 mutations that are common in the database. (C and D) TP53 mutation type (C) and TP53 mutation spectrum (D) are compared between mutations identified in UL from controls (n = 79), UL from cases (n = 33), and the UMD database (n = 71,051). (E) TP53 mutation distribution map for UL (top) and the UMD cancer database (bottom). Bars quantify the frequency of mutations at each codon. Colored background reflects a 20-bp sliding window average of mutation density around each position. Gene exons and protein domains are indicated in the center section. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 TP53 Mutations in Normal Tissues and UL from Two Middle-Aged Women (A) Normal tissues collected included leukocytes, peritoneum, cervix, endometrium, myometrium, fallopian tube, ovary, and UL. (B) TP53 mutation frequency for each sample calculated as the number of TP53 mutations in the coding region divided by the total number of DS nucleotides sequenced. (a) and (b) indicate two spatially separated samples from the same tissue. The blue bars correspond to the samples in this study; the orange bars correspond to the mean values for ULs from control women in the first study. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Characterization of TP53 Mutations in Normal Tissues over a Century of Human Lifespan TP53 mutations identified by DS in leukocytes and gynecological tissues are indicated as columns within each tissue. Each mutation is characterized by four parameters: type (synonymous, non-synonymous, and hotspots), frequency in cancer, protein activity, and predicted pathogenicity. The last three parameters are color-coded, with red indicating “cancer-like” mutations and blue indicating benign mutations. Vertical black lines separate different biopsies from the same tissue. Within each biopsy, mutations are ordered left to right by decreasing cancer frequency. The biopsies that were sequenced but no mutations were identified are shown in gray. Note that the female newborn in the study had no blood collected. The leukocytes included here correspond to a similarly aged newborn male. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Cancer-Associated TP53 Mutations Are Positively Selected during Normal Aging (A) Across a variety of human tissues, TP53 mutations accumulate with age and are progressively enriched for mutations commonly found in cancers. Tissues are color-coded. (a) and (b) indicate two biopsies from the same tissue. (B) Traits of positive selection are compared between all of the possible mutations in the TP53 coding region (n = 3,546); TP53 mutations found in newborns (n = 19), middle-aged individuals (n = 85), and centenarian individuals (n = 38); and TP53 mutations reported in the UMD cancer database (n = 71,051). (C and D) Distribution of TP53 mutation type (C) and mutation spectrum (D) for newborn, middle-aged, and centenarian mutations compared to the UMD cancer database. Cell Reports 2019 28, 132-144.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.109) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions