Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0029r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks, one.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Overview of IEEE Date: Authors: September 2014
Overview of IEEE Date: Authors: August 2014
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
January 2007 Opening Report
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Call for Contribution to IG CUB
Call for Contribution to SG CUB
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
May 2007 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2007 March 2007
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
November 2013 Opening Report
[place presentation subject title text here]
September 2006 Opening Report
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2010
March 2007 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2007
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
Contribution on Location Privacy
IEEE P Project Status Date: Authors: July 2013
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
Decision on SG Formation
November Opening Report
TVWS Coexistence Study Group Extension Request
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
Reference Use Cases Date: Authors: September 2010
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Discussion on SG Formation
Decision on SG Formation
September Opening Report
November 2005 Liaison Report to P1900.2
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
EC Summary of PAR Development
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
Coexistence Reconfiguration Parameters
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
EC Study Group on TV White Space
November Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
November 2012 Opening Report
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
September 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Motion for Study Group on TV White Space Coexistence
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
November 2014 Opening Report
July 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2013
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0021r1 May 2006 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Date: 2006-05-15 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.19. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <shellhammer@ieee.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

May 2006 Introduction The purpose of this presentation is to stimulate a discussion of various Coexistence Scenarios for the 802.19 Recommended Practice Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks Two wireless networks Frequency static Either co-channel or adjacent channel Interference dominated by the close proximity of one device in each network Two small networks Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 1: Frequency Static Unlicensed Wireless Networks Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 2: Frequency Static & FHSS Unlicensed Wireless Networks Same as coexistence scenario 1 just one system is a FHSS system (e.g. BT) Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) A primary user in a portion of the band Unlicensed system uses spectrum sensing and dynamic frequency selection (DFS) to identify occupied and vacant channels Examples WRAN in operating unused TV channels WLAN operating in 5 GHz band and avoiding radar system Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 3: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Coexistence Scenario 4: Clear Channel Assessment May 2006 Coexistence Scenario 4: Clear Channel Assessment Two unlicensed wireless networks sharing a common frequency band One or both of the systems use some form of clear channel assessment to test whether the channel is occupied or not before using the channel Regular 802.11 operation The 20/40 MHz problem The 802.11y problem with non-802.11 systems in the band WLAN/WPAN attempting to share the frequency band Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

More Examples Fill in more examples based on TAG discussion May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0021r1 May 2006 More Examples Fill in more examples based on TAG discussion Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm