Institutional Research and Planning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
Advertisements

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
The Evergreen State College Game show Your hosts: The folks from Institutional Research and Assessment.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Global Health Minor Cornell’s Global Health Minor Begun in 2006 with cofunding from the US National Institutes of Health and Cornell University Complements.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
For university applicants. Choosing the right course and right university for you is more important than the accommodation ‘I had my own room in a cosy.
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Comparing Senior And Sophomore Knowledge and Confidence Concerning Academic Advising Anecdotal evidence suggested that a discrepancy existed between what.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
Describe, in German, the following: I live in a house. On the ground floor I have a kitchen, bathroom and living room. On the first floor I have 3 bedrooms.
University of Wyoming Student Satisfaction  Three student surveys (March 2014)  Noel-Levitz (NL) Student Satisfaction Inventory  ACT Student.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Essential Resources for College Students. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.10 | 2 Essential Resources for College Students.
Undergraduate&Graduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2016
National Survey of Student Engagement Noel-Levitz Satisfaction Surveys
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Community Survey Report
ACT Student Opinion Survey Results
2008 Roper Public Opinion Poll on PBS
Where is Maria? 32 living room dining room bathroom kitchen bedroom
Fall 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Institutional Research and Planning
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2017
2003 Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Housing & Residential Education
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
One Step Away Initiative
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Report to the Board of Trustees November 2018
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2018
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Defining Non-Traditional Students for Retention Studies
Temple University.
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Institutional Research and Planning
Post-bac Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Certificate Program
Student Satisfaction Learning Community Spring 2011
Student Experience Survey 2016 Preliminary Analysis
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
NVMI Standard operating procedures
Kimberly Paulus Director, Student Academic Services
Washburn University Graduating Student Survey
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Research and Planning Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2014 Undergraduate and Graduate Students Institutional Research and Planning 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Sample (n = 1269) 21 % response rate 8/22/2019

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate Students Comparison 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction 2014 Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction 2014 Importance and Satisfaction (means) – Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2013 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Factors with Increases/Decreases in Student Satisfaction Personal security and safety on campus. (+20%) General condition of buildings and grounds. (-6%) 8/22/2019

Key factors* in Overall Satisfaction Spring 2013-Undergraduate quality of instruction satisfaction with NJIT Quality of campus life Overall Satisfaction With Registrar’s Office .169 .4 .362 Relevance of coursework to career development .238 Quality of academic advisement . 151 The overall usefulness of NJIT's website .179 .2 General condition of building and grounds *Regression model run using SPSS to show academic and cultural variables that predict overall satisfaction. 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Academics 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Campus Life 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Computers 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Public Safety/Buildings & Grounds 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Student Services 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (means) 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (percentage) 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction With NJIT 5 Year Comparison 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Graduate Student Sample (n = 645) 29% response rate 8/22/2019

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Graduate Students Comparison 8/22/2019

Graduate Student Satisfaction 2014 Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction 2014 Importance And Satisfaction (means) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Graduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2013 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Factors with Increases in Student Satisfaction Personal security and safety on campus (12%) 8/22/2019

Key factors* in Graduate Student Overall Satisfaction quality of instruction satisfaction with NJIT Quality of campus life Overall satisfaction With financial aid services .168 .444 .251 Relevance of coursework to career development .182 Quality of academic advisement . 164 with registrar office .113 .115 Billing and fee payment policies and procedures Availability of campus computing resources .226 *Regression model run using SPSS to show academic and cultural variables that predict overall satisfaction. 8/22/2019

Graduate Student Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (means) 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Five Year Comparison (percentage) 8/22/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School 8/22/2019

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School CoAD Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Overall Graduate Satisfaction Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School 8/22/2019

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School CoAD Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied 8/22/2019

Undergraduate and Graduate Overall Satisfaction Appendix 3: Undergraduate and Graduate Overall Satisfaction with Housing 8/22/2019

Undergraduate Overall Satisfaction with Housing   N Percent Overall Satisfaction with Housing NJIT housing 387 34.46% 3.55 University Centre 33 2.94% 3.42 NJIT Greek Village 29 2.58% Off-campus Greek fraternity/sorority housing 3 0.27% 4.33 Off-campus with parents/other relatives 501 44.61% 3.43 Off-campus with roommate/friends 40 3.56% 3.3 Off-campus with spouse/significant other 69 6.14% 3.30 Off-campus alone 61 5.43% 3.25 8/22/2019

Graduate Overall Satisfaction with Housing   N Percent Overall Satisfaction with Housing NJIT housing 20 3.58% 3.35 University Centre 31 5.55% 3.68 NJIT Greek Village 12 2.15% 3.5 Off-campus Greek fraternity/sorority housing 1 0.18% 3 Off-campus with parents/other relatives 89 15.92% 3.39 Off-campus with roommate/friends 188 33.63% 3.69 Off-campus with spouse/significant other 139 24.87% 3.46 Off-campus alone 79 14.13% 3.22 8/22/2019

Graduate Students: What type of on-campus housing would you prefer?   N Percent Married student apartment 27 4.5% Married student apartment with children 22 3.67% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom in a suite; shared living room, kitchen, and bathroom) 71 11.83% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom and bathroom in a suite; shared living room and kitchen) 82 13.67% Single small bedroom and shared facilities (bathroom, lounge, and kitchen). 63 10.5% Prefer to live off-campus. 335 55.83% 8/22/2019

Graduate Students: What type of on-campus housing would you prefer Graduate Students: What type of on-campus housing would you prefer? (of graduate students who currently live off-campus)   N Percent Married student apartment 25 4.69% Married student apartment with children 21 3.94% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom in a suite; shared living room, kitchen, and bathroom) 57 10.69% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom and bathroom in a suite; shared living room and kitchen) 63 11.82% Single small bedroom and shared facilities (bathroom, lounge, and kitchen). 44 8.26% Prefer to live off-campus. 323 60.60% 8/22/2019

Graduate Students: What type of on-campus housing would you prefer Graduate Students: What type of on-campus housing would you prefer? (of graduate students who currently live on-campus)   N Percent Married student apartment 2 2.99% Married student apartment with children 1 1.49% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom in a suite; shared living room, kitchen, and bathroom) 14 20.90% Shared apartment with roommate/roommates. (Own bedroom and bathroom in a suite; shared living room and kitchen) 19 28.36% Single small bedroom and shared facilities (bathroom, lounge, and kitchen). Prefer to live off-campus. 12 17.91% 8/22/2019