Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1 A B Figure S1. SPATA2 is required for TNFα or zVAD.fmk induced necroptosis in L929 cells. (A) L929 cells were transfected with a pool of four.
Advertisements

UV as an Amplifier Rather Than Inducer of NF-κB Activity
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
DAI/ZBP1/DLM-1 Complexes with RIP3 to Mediate Virus-Induced Programmed Necrosis that Is Targeted by Murine Cytomegalovirus vIRA  Jason W. Upton, William J.
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Brian Yordy, Norifumi Iijima, Anita Huttner, David Leib, Akiko Iwasaki 
Influenza Virus-Induced Glucocorticoids Compromise Innate Host Defense against a Secondary Bacterial Infection  Amanda M. Jamieson, Shuang Yu, Charles.
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Alex M. Agelidis, Satvik R. Hadigal, Dinesh Jaishankar, Deepak Shukla 
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Survival Function of the FADD-CASPASE-8-cFLIPL Complex
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2017)
A JNK-Dependent Pathway Is Required for TNFα-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
TNF-α Induces Two Distinct Caspase-8 Activation Pathways
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
TNF-Induced Activation of the Nox1 NADPH Oxidase and Its Role in the Induction of Necrotic Cell Death  You-Sun Kim, Michael J. Morgan, Swati Choksi, Zheng-gang.
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Olivier Micheau, Jürg Tschopp  Cell 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
PPARδ Is a Type 1 IFN Target Gene and Inhibits Apoptosis in T Cells
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Melissa B. Uccellini, Adolfo García-Sastre  Cell Reports 
Herpes Simplex Virus Suppresses Necroptosis in Human Cells
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
MK2 Phosphorylates RIPK1 to Prevent TNF-Induced Cell Death
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Getting a gRIP on Flu by Casting the DAI
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 13-24 (July 2016) RIPK3 Activates Parallel Pathways of MLKL-Driven Necroptosis and FADD-Mediated Apoptosis to Protect against Influenza A Virus  Shoko Nogusa, Roshan J. Thapa, Christopher P. Dillon, Swantje Liedmann, Thomas H. Oguin, Justin P. Ingram, Diego A. Rodriguez, Rachelle Kosoff, Shalini Sharma, Oliver Sturm, Katherine Verbist, Peter J. Gough, John Bertin, Boris M. Hartmann, Stuart C. Sealfon, William J. Kaiser, Edward S. Mocarski, Carolina B. López, Paul G. Thomas, Andrew Oberst, Douglas R. Green, Siddharth Balachandran  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 13-24 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 RIPK3 Is Required for IAV-Induced Lysis of MEFs and Alveolar Epithelial Cells (A) Ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− MEFs were infected with the indicated strains of influenza virus at MOI = 2 or treated with TNF-α (50 ng/ml) in the presence of cycloheximide (250 ng/ml) and zVAD (50 μM), and cell viability was determined at 24 hr p.i. (B) Photomicrographs of ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− MEFs infected with PR8 or treated with TCZ for 24 hr. (C) FACS analysis of ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− MEFs infected with PR8-GFP (MOI = 2). The y axis shows side scatter. (D) Ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− MEFs infected with PR8 were examined for virus replication by immunoblotting with antiserum raised against PR8 or a monoclonal antibody to NS1. A non-specific band detected in uninfected lysates by the anti-PR8 antiserum is indicated with an asterisk (∗). Molecular weights (in kDa) are shown to the left. (E) Kinetics of cell death after PR8 infection of ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− MEFs at the indicated MOIs. (F) Ripk3−/− (in the presence or absence of 50 μM zVAD), ripk3−/−casp8−/−, or ripk3−/−fadd−/− MEFs were infected with PR8 and cell viability was determined 36 hr p.i. (G) Parental LET1 lung epithelial cells, or LET1 cells in which RIPK3 expression was ablated by CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of the sequence 5′-TGAGAACGTTCTGCTCCTGC-3′ in the murine ripk3 gene, were infected with PR8 and viability (left) or progeny virion output (right) was determined 12 hr p.i. Inset: immunoblot showing RIPK3 levels in these cells, with β-actin included as a loading control. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005. See also Figures S1, S2, and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IAV Activates Formation of a RIPK3-Containing Necrosome Complex (A) Wild-type MEFs were infected with PR8 (MOI = 2) in the presence or absence of zVAD (25 μM), or treated with TCZ (right). Cells were lysed at the indicated time points, and anti-RIPK3 immunoprecipitates were examined for necrosome formation as described before (Thapa et al., 2013). IAV- or TCZ-activated RIPK3-RIPK1 necrosomes additionally contain FADD and MLKL. Whole-cell extract (5% input) was examined in parallel for RIPK1, RIPK3, FADD, MLKL, and IAV NS1 proteins. (B) Time course of RIPK1/RIPK3 necrosome formation demonstrates that necrosome assembly succeeds virus replication. (C) RIPK3 immunoprecipitations performed on extracts from PR8-infected MEFs that were pre-treated with the indicated doses of Actinomycin D (ActD), cycloxehimide (CHX), or Nucleozin (Nuc), before infection indicates that the IAV-induced necrosome formation requires ongoing transcription, translation, and viral replication. (D) RIPK3 immunoprecipitations were performed on extracts from MEFs infected with PR8 or treated with TCZ in the presence or absence of the indicated doses of the RIPK3 kinase inhibitors GSK’872 or GSK’843 (left) or the RIPK1 kinase inhibitors GSK’963 or GSK’481 (right). (E) Primary early passage wild-type (WT) and the indicated knockout MEFs were infected with PR8 in the presence of zVAD (50 μM) with or without the RIPK3 inhibitor GSK’843 (5 μM). As controls, ripk3−/− MEFs retrovirally reconstituted with full-length murine RIPK3, or with an empty vector, were used. Viability was determined 24 hr p.i. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗∗p < 0.005. See also Figures S3 and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RIPK3 Activates Parallel Pathways of Necroptosis and Apoptosis upon IAV Infection (A) Ripk3+/+ MEFs were infected with PR8 (MOI = 2) in the presence or absence of zVAD (50 μM), RIPK1 kinase inhibitors (GSK’963 [5 μM], GSK’481 [5 μM], and Nec-1 [50 μM]), or RIPK3 kinase inhibitors (GSK’872 [5 μM], and GSK’843 [5 μM]), and cell viability was determined 24 hr p.i. TCZ-treated wild-type MEFs exposed to the same doses of RIPK1 or RIPK3 inhibitors were used as controls. (B) LET1 lung epithelial cells were infected with PR8 in the presence or absence of zVAD (50 μM) or GSK’843 (5 μM), and viability was determined 12 hr p.i. LET1 cells treated with TCZ were included as controls. (C) Human HT-29 cells were infected with PR8 (MOI = 5) in the presence or absence zVAD (50 μM) or GSK’840 (3 μM), and viability was determined 14 hr p.i. HT-29 cells treated with human TNF-α (50 ng/ml), SMAC mimetic LCL161 (5 μM), and zVAD (50 μM) were included as controls (TSZ). (D) Kinetics of cell death after wild-type or UV-inactivated (PR8 UV) PR8 infection in ripk3+/+ MEFs in the presence or absence of caspase inhibitor QvD (40 μM) or GSK’872 (5 μM) was analyzed for up to 36 hr p.i. Cell death was determined by Sytox Green uptake and quantified as number of Sytox Green positive cells over time. (E) Wild-type MEFs infected with PR8 in the presence of GSK’843 (5 μM), zVAD (50 μM), or both inhibitors together were examined for phosphorylated MLKL or cleaved caspase-8 by immunoblot analysis at the indicated times post-infection. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005. See also Figures S4 and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 MLKL Drives Necroptosis and FADD Mediates Apoptosis following IAV Infection (A) Wild-type, fadd −/−, mlkl−/−, and mlkl−/−fadd−/− double-knockout MEFs were infected with PR8 in the presence or absence of pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD (50 μM), the caspase-8 inhibitor zIETD (50 μM), and/or 5 μM of RIPK3 kinase inhibitors (GSK’872 and GSK’843). Cell viability was determined 24 hr p.i. (B) Wild-type, fadd −/−, mlkl−/−, mlkl−/−fadd−/−, and ripk3−/− MEFs were infected with PR8 for 16 hr and examined for phosphorylated MLKL or cleaved caspase-8 by immunoblot analysis. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005. See also Figures S2, S5, and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RIPK1 Mediates RIPK3-Dependent Apoptosis in IAV-Infected Cells (A) Ripk1−/−, ripk1k45/a/k45a, and ripk1d138n/d138n MEFs were infected with PR8 (MOI = 2) in the presence or absence of zVAD (50 μM) or 5 μM of the RIPK3 inhibitors GSK’872 or GSK’843, and viability was determined 24 hr p.i. (B) Ripk1−/−, ripk1k45/a/k45a, and ripk1d138n/d138n MEFs were treated with TCZ and viability was determined 24 hr p.i. (C) Ripk1−/−, ripk1d138n/d138n (referred to as ripk1kd/kd), and ripk3−/− MEFs were infected with PR8 and examined for phosphorylated MLKL or cleaved caspase-8 by immunoblot analysis at the indicated times p.i. (D) Ripk1+/+ and ripk1−/− MEFs were infected with PR8 in the presence of zVAD (25 μM). Cells were lysed at the indicated time points, and RIPK3-immunoprecipitated lysates were examined for presence of FADD. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005; ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. See also Figures S2 and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 RIPK3-Activated Necroptosis and Apoptosis Pathways Are Both Required for Protection against IAV In Vivo (A) Survival analysis of age- and sex-matched ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− mice infected with PR8 (4,000 EID50/mouse by i.n.). (B) Survival analysis of age- and sex-matched mlkl+/+, mlkl−/−, and mlkl−/−fadd−/− double-knockout mice with PR8 (4,000 EID50/mouse by i.n.). Data are pooled from two independent experiments. (C) Virus titers were determined on infected lungs 3 or 9 d.p.i. by plaque assay (n = 3–5). (D) Paraffin-embedded sections of ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− mouse lungs 6 d.p.i. were stained with anti-IAV antibodies, and slides were scanned and virus spread was quantified using Aperio ImageScope. Representative images of anti-IAV stained 11 ripk3+/+ (top) and 10 ripk3−/− (bottom) lungs are shown to the left, and quantification of virus spread from lungs of individual mice are shown to the right. (E) Representative images of H&E-stained 11 ripk3+/+ and 10 ripk3−/− lungs 6 d.p.i. at two magnifications reveal severe edema and alveolar damage in ripk3−/− pulmonary tissue (left). Quantification of alveolar fibrin deposition from lungs of individual mice is shown to the right. The extent and severity of pulmonary damage was determined from blinded sections examined by a pathologist and scored for the distribution of alveolar fibrin deposition on a severity scale of 1–5. These scores were converted to a semiquantitative scale as described previously (Matute-Bello et al., 2011). (F) Representative images of CD3+ staining in 11 ripk3+/+ and 10 ripk3−/− lungs 6 d.p.i. Quantification of CD3+ staining from lungs of individual mice are shown to the right. (G) Quantification of frequencies of IAV-specific (DbPA224) CD8+ T cells and percentage of IAV PA224 peptide-stimulated poly-functional IFN-γ+TNF-α+CD8+ T cells in BAL fluid from ripk3+/+ and ripk3−/− animals (n = 3–5) at 9 d.p.i. The low pathogenic HKx31 reassortant of PR8 was used in these experiments to avoid 9-d.p.i. lethality effects seen with PR8. Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. See also Figure S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 13-24DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions