Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Instructional materials

Table 8. Drawing result before game

% Asian/Pacific Islander

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Knowledge about elderly care

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Rating of Water Quality

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Actual descriptive example

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes

To what extend do you buy products or services through SMA?

Group Male Female Total Astrocytoma Grade 2 (%65)13 (%35)7 (%100)20

Table 1. Summary of SETE Factors Considered in Previous Studies

Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Socio-demographic data

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Presentation transcript:

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of the Dimensions of SETE Attributes Overall Average Male Rank Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female The Instructor’s Personality (IP) 4.120 1 3.913 4.016 The Instructor’s Knowledge and Teaching Abilities (IKT) 4.015 3 3.829 3.922 The Course Attributes (CA) 4.071 2 3.853 3.962 Assessment and Grading (AG) 3.985 5 3.781 3.883 Learning Outcomes (LO) 3.986 4 3.826 3.906 Tayfour Abdalla Mohammed et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness in Saudi Higher Education: The Case of Jubail University College. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 5, 464-475. doi:10.12691/education-5-5-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.