Rate the research papers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLIC SPEAKING DEFINITION
Advertisements

Writing the Inductive Essay Going from examples to conclusions.
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
Environmental Issues Presentation. Task After researching scientific and technical resources, write and present an argumentation speech that identifies.
Critical Writing Using the elements and the standards.
Strategies for Written Argument English 102 Becky Cooper.
Writing Persuasive Messages Chapter 10. Purpose To change your audience’s beliefs, actions, or values by providing sound, credible advice to solutions,
Proposals Problem-Solution-Justification. Developing a Proposal Argument n Convincing your readers that a problem exists n Showing the specifics of your.
1 Dr. Marie Zener As Class Convenes u Find your team u Pick up your team’s folder; u Remove all old work u Sign attendance form.
Reliability & Validity Qualitative Research Methods.
The Elements of Critical Thinking Task 1: Establish a Shared Vocabulary.
Learning to Think Critically
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
Elements of Critical Thinking Establishing a Shared Vocabulary.
{ Senate Hearing Project Kathryn Gustafson Farmington High School.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
B121 Chapter 3 Learning Skills. Reading and note taking Identify your own reading strategies A reading strategy is an operation you put into action according.
Chapter 3 – Critical Thinking and Viewing © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 33: Writing an Argumentative Essay. Writing Clearly (pp ) Two people benefit from clear writing: –The reader will be able to follow your.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
THE ESSAY From the French ‘essai’ - attempt English ‘assay’ – ‘try’ or ‘to weigh’
Argumentation.
Understanding Smarter Balanced Assessment Results.
Making Effective Presentations By Khalil F. Matta.
Types of Claims.
Billie J. Jones School of Writing, Rhetoric, and Technical Communication.
Two Types of Argument 1.Arguing a Position 2.Arguing a Solution.
Critical Thinking or how to learn and know that you know what you know, if you know it Terry C. Norris.
Organizing and Developing Your Draft of the Big Paper.
Elements of Critical Thinking
Business Case Analysis
The Final Exam.
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Learning to Think Critically
Learning to Think Critically
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Inclusion: Harmony & Conflict
How to write the rough draft
AP Language RHETORICAL ANALYSIS Test Strategy
THE ESSAY From the French ‘essai’ - attempt
Critical Reading in Practice
Title of Your Thesis Your name
The In-Class Critical Essay
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Building Paper 2 The Play-Doh Method
Oral Presentation Reminders
Reviewing Your Argument
CHAPTER SIXTEEN Argumentation
CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
Chapter 3 – Critical Thinking and Viewing
The Graduate School in Electronics, Telecommunications, and Automation
Rhetorical Appeals.
Learning to Think Critically
In negative messages, the basic information is negative, and you expect that the reader may be disappointed or angry.
External assessment details—SL
CreATE AND DELIVER GREAT pRESENTATIONS
Chapter 3 Critically reviewing the literature
Chapter 4: Writing a Rhetorical Analysis
Your agenda should answer WHEN, WHO, WHY, WHAT, PREPARE, HOW.
(hint: not just a fight!)
Day 6.
The Elements of Reasoning
In persuasive messages, you want the reader to act upon your message
Writing an Argumentative Essay
Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
Planning Essays as Communication
9th Literature EOC Review
Presentation transcript:

Rate the research papers

This paper asks you to Construct an inductive argument (question at beginning, thesis/answer/solution at the end) Pitch it to a specific audience Take into account that audience’s FBIs and F&P concepts as you organize, develop, & present the paper Find sources that audience will respect Show your thinking—go thru alternatives, use SEE-IT Execute with accuracy and precision Pass a CAIR standards check on your own pitch

Remember you have already Analyzed your own FBIs and F&P concepts—reflection/conclusions at the end (somewhat inductive) Analyzed how Fallows made his case to a specific audience in a deductive argument (thesis at the beginning) Analyzed how a cultural events presenter made a pitch specifically to you Used your F&P concepts and P.O.V. to look at a section of Wilson Evaluated how well others looked at Wilson…

Pitch defined purpose and clearly stated question/problem at issue and clearly connected it to a green agenda (5) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Pitch tailored information to a specific and identifiable audience, including allowing for its FBIs and its F&P concepts (8) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Using an inductive strategy, writer established context, exposed barriers, established P.O.V. (5) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Heavy preponderance of sources from appropriate peer-reviewed or disciplinary accepted sources (Nosich ch. 3) gave pitch credibility (5) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Writer provided adequate, credible information and analyzed its importance (use of SEE-IT) (10) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Organization was clear, psychologically appropriate and logical (7) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Writer showed work & weighed alternatives, options, outcomes, solutions appropriately and thoroughly, meeting the standards of depth, breadth, and sufficiency (10) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson

Using an inductive strategy, writer made a clear and convincing recommendation to solve the problem and showed the implications of doing so, meeting the CAIR standards (5) Dick Van Dyke Bill Murray Emily Dickinson LeBron James Omarosa Phil Mickelson