E. Hare,*H.D. Norman, and J.R. Wright

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Advertisements

Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
2004 H.D. Norman, A.H. Sanders,* R.H. Miller, and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricutural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2005 ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) Historical examination of culling of dairy cows from herds in the United States H. DUANE NORMAN, E. HARE, and J.R. WRIGHT.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Enhancing Quality Of Dystocia Data By Integration Into A National Dairy Cattle Production Database C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and G. R. Wiggans 1 Animal Improvement.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Assessment of voluntary waiting period and frequency of estrus synchronization among herds R.H. Miller, 1, * H.D. Norman, 1 M.T. Kuhn, 1 and J.S. Clay.
Breed Composition Codes for Crossbred Dairy Cattle in the United States John B. Cole,* Melvin E. Tooker, Paul M. VanRaden, and Joel H. Megonigal, Jr. Animal.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
Trends in Noncompliance with Milk Quality Standards for Dairy Herd Improvement Herds in the United States H. D. Norman*, J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) 2005 A Salute to Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service US Department of Agriculture.
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
Minimum Dry Period Length to Maximize Performance M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
 The United States provided the most foreign sires of sons every year, as high as 86%.  Canada was second in most years.  Combined, North American contributed.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Project Approach and Outreach
A National Sire Fertility Index
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Percent of total breedings
Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
Country “Quilt” Project: una introducciÓn
Multiplicative Factors
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

E. Hare,*H.D. Norman, and J.R. Wright Duration of Herd Participation in Dairy Herd Improvement Milk Recording in the United States E. Hare,*H.D. Norman, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350 INTRODUCTION Genetic evaluations are used by dairy cattle breeders to measure quantitatively an individual animal’s merit as breeding stock for future generations. Participation in milk-recording programs that provide data for national genetic evaluations of U.S. dairy cattle is voluntary. However, effectiveness of the evaluation system and opportunity for genetic improvement increase with the number of herds that contribute data. This study investigated patterns of herd participation in Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) testing. RESULTS (continued) Frequency (%) of herds by time on continuous DHI test and initiation and termination years for herd participation: Year 1 mo 2-3 mo 4-11 mo 1-2 yr 3-4 yr 5-9 yr 10-14 yr 15-19 yr 20 yr Initial test: 1960-64 19.9 17.8 16.3 16.1 8.1 10.1 4.0 1.8 6.0 1965-69 18.2 16.5 15.9 16.6 7.9 9.7 3.8 2.8 8.6 1970-74 19.5 15.9 15.7 14.9 7.1 8.1 5.3 3.4 10.0 1975-79 19.9 14.4 14.0 13.3 6.7 11.0 5.7 4.5 10.3 1980-84 19.6 14.6 14.8 15.9 7.9 9.4 5.9 … … 1985-89 21.2 13.6 14.2 14.9 7.6 11.9 … … … 1990-94 23.1 14.0 14.9 16.6 8.5 … … … … 1995-99 21.2 13.0 15.0 16.0 … … … … … 2000-02 27.8 15.3 … … … … … … … All years 20.3 15.3 … … … … … … … Final test: 1960-64 22.3 20.2 19.1 19.4 8.7 8.5 1.7 0.0 0.0 1965-69 17.9 16.2 16.3 19.1 10.8 14.3 4.2 1.1 0.0 1970-74 19.3 15.8 15.4 16.2 8.8 14.6 6.9 2.3 0.6 1975-79 24.0 17.2 16.6 14.9 7.0 9.4 6.1 3.2 1.6 1980-84 23.2 17.3 17.5 17.3 7.9 8.5 3.6 2.6 2.1 1985-89 19.6 12.8 13.6 16.1 9.0 13.3 6.2 3.5 5.8 1990-94 19.7 11.9 13.0 15.1 8.1 12.6 7.9 4.4 7.3 1995-99 18.6 11.6 13.2 14.8 6.4 10.9 7.8 6.4 10.2 2000-02 18.4 9.9 12.1 12.4 12.2 9.0 6.9 5.6 13.4 All years 19.0 14.4 14.8 15.9 8.5 12.1 5.8 3.5 6.1 Herds still on test 2.5 2.4 4.3 7.4 6.9 20.5 11.9 11.0 33.2 CONCLUSIONS Across all years (1960 through 2002), 65% of herds had one period of continuous testing with no lapse in testing. Percentage of herds with testing lapses decreased as number of lapses increased and as initial test year became more recent. For herds that terminated DHI testing from 1960 through 2002, 64% were on continuous test for <3 yr. Herds with more recent termination dates had remained on continuous test longer, and one-third of herds that were still on test after June 2002 had been on test for at least 20 yr. Herd participation varied considerably by region: Since 1980, duration of participation has been shorter than the U.S. mean for herds in the Southeast, Midwest, and Southwest. Herds in the Northeast had the longest periods on test until 1990, but since then herds in the Mideast have had the longest durations of participation. The shortest durations of partici- pation occurred in the Southeast region. Herds that have multiple periods of testing with lapses of >6 mo between test periods represent a loss of data that negatively impacts research and genetic improvement. Eliminating testing lapses would benefit the U.S. dairy industry by increasing accuracy of information available for management and breeding decisions and by enhancing understanding of genetic character-istics of the U.S. dairy population. DATA & METHODS Participation in DHI testing from 1960 through 2002 was examined by herd to determine periods of time on and off monthly test. Continuous test was defined as periods when intervals between herd tests were 6 mo; multiple periods of continuous test had lapses of >6 mo. Herd participation was analyzed by both initiation and termination years. Impact of geographical location was examined for five U.S. regions: Frequency (%) of herds by time on continuous DHI test, means (yr), and SD by region: Region 1 mo 2-3 mo 4-11 mo 1-2 yr 3-4 yr 5-9 yr 10-14 yr 15-19 yr 20 yr Mean  SD Mideast 14.4 10.0 12.5 13.0 7.6 12.6 8.3 6.4 15.7 8.3  10.8 Midwest 20.0 11.7 13.4 14.2 8.1 9.5 7.1 6.0 10.2 6.2  9.4 Mountain-Prairie 18.4 9.2 12.3 13.6 7.7 13.0 8.8 5.6 11.3 6.6  8.9 Northeast 15.5 10.4 11.7 14.4 8.7 10.8 8.1 7.1 13.4 7.7  10.5 Northwest 17.0 9.4 13.3 14.0 8.2 10.9 9.0 6.4 11.9 7.0  9.4 Southeast 21.9 11.4 15.1 14.4 6.6 11.7 7.4 4.5 7.0 5.1  7.8 Southwest 20.8 11.0 11.6 12.8 10.1 11.1 6.9 5.8 9.9 5.9  8.2 United States 18.6 11.1 12.9 14.1 8.1 10.4 7.6 6.2 11.2 6.7  9.6 RESULTS Frequency (%), means (yr), and standard deviations (SD) of periods of continuous test by initial test year of herd: Periods of continuous test Year 1 2 3 4 5 >6 Mean  SD <1960 20.2 20.3 17.6 14.6 17.2 10.2 3.5  2.3 1960-64 57.5 20.2 10.2 4.9 4.5 2.7 2.0  1.7 1965-69 59.9 19.1 9.1 4.8 3.9 3.2 1.9  1.8 1970-74 62.6 19.6 8.1 4.0 3.4 2.2 1.8  1.5 1975-79 62.2 20.4 8.7 3.9 3.1 1.6 1.8  1.4 1980-84 65.5 20.2 7.4 3.4 2.3 1.2 1.6  1.3 1985-89 69.5 18.0 6.4 2.8 2.4 1.0 1.6  1.2 1990-94 69.2 17.7 6.9 3.1 2.5 0.7 1.6  1.1 1995-99 72.9 16.3 6.0 2.9 1.7 0.1 1.5  0.9 2000-02 83.7 13.0 3.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2  0.5 1960-2002 64.8 19.0 7.9 3.7 3.0 1.6 1.7  1.4 Means (yr) and SD of time on continuous DHI test by region and termination year for herd participation: Mountain- United Year Mideast Midwest Prairie Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest States 1960-64 1.5  2.3 1.5  2.4 1.2  2.0 2.0  2.7 1.5  2.4 1.1  1.9 1.8  3.0 1.6  2.5 1965-69 2.2  3.2 2.2  3.2 1.8  2.7 3.7  4.1 2.2  3.0 1.6  2.6 1.7  2.8 2.6  3.5 1970-74 3.1  4.4 2.9  4.2 2.7  3.7 4.6  5.3 2.8  3.9 2.6  3.9 1.7  2.7 3.2  4.4 1975-79 3.3  5.3 2.9  5.0 2.7  4.0 3.6  5.8 2.4  3.8 2.5  4.4 2.3  3.5 3.0  5.0 1980-84 3.4  5.6 2.5  4.8 2.7  4.7 3.4  5.8 2.2  3.8 1.9  3.6 2.4  3.6 2.8  5.0 1985-89 5.5  7.9 3.9  6.4 4.2  6.2 5.9  8.0 4.2  5.8 3.1  5.2 4.5  5.6 4.6  6.9 1990-94 6.3  9.0 5.1  7.8 4.6  6.9 6.2  8.6 5.6  7.4 3.4  6.1 4.8  6.5 5.3  7.9 1995-99 8.1  10.4 6.0  9.1 6.5  8.7 7.6  10.2 6.8  9.0 4.9  7.5 5.6  7.8 6.5  9.4 2000-02 8.9  11.8 6.8  9.8 7.0  9.1 8.2  11.3 7.5  10.4 5.7  8.8 6.4  9.0 7.2  10.2 All years 2.7  5.5 2.6  5.3 2.3  4.7 2.9  5.7 2.0  4.0 2.4  4.7 3.1  5.2 2.6  5.3