Looking at the STAAR reasons we fail Please log-in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSERVICE GOALS: Understand TEKS Understand the difference in difficulty between TAAS & the TAKS Recognize the TAKS critical thinking skills required in.
Advertisements

Using Text Effectively in the Biology Classroom
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
Developed by the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) CSCOPE End of Year Update Planning for /18/2015.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
Workshop 3 Supporting Students’ Oral Language Development Workshop 3 Supporting Student’s Literacy learning Slide1.
Analysis of Literary Text: Understanding and Preparing for the PARCC LAT and NWT COLLEGE CAREER READY CONFERENCE 2015.
Login Username: lastname+first initial Password: lpisd11% (first login you will change it)
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
TEKS RESOURCE SYSTEM NEW AND IMPROVED COMPONENTS UPDATES.
Curriculum Overview for New Teachers New Teacher Orientation August 5, :30 P.M.
Social Studies Text Session District Learning Day Location goes here Session time goes here August 5, 2015.
NAVIGATING CSCOPE JENNIFER PAYNE, CSCOPE CONSULTANT, ESC XIV
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
UbD: Goals for the Session
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
T-TESS and District Connections
Lesson planning 101 – Assessment & Questions
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Looking at the STAAR reasons we fail Please log-in.
Setting up the Game Board
NAVIGATING THROUGH LEARNING VILLAGE
Question Answer Relationships
Three-Phase Lesson Plan Model
Effective Planning – with the End in Mind - Teaching to the Standards
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Tutorial Welcome to Module 13
Three-Phase Lesson Plan Model
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
Why Test? Comparative Diagnostic To standards (criteria based)
TEKS Resource System: Mathematics
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
The groups will most likely be very small
FSA Parent Information
Assessing Math Looking closer at PARCC Task Types.
Using Teach 21 For Professional Development
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Analyzing our Reading Data 3 – 5
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards
K-12 Social Studies Training on Concept-Based Lesson Planning
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Implementation in a Transition Year
Implementation in a Transition Year
Common Core Standards Building Curriculum Units
TEKS RS Update Focal Documents Assessment Creator Science Assessment Update Science STAAR Analysis Publishing Date.
Implementation in a Transition Year
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
Connection: …between formative and summative assessment (including use of data)
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
Taking Note of CCSD Resources
Implementation in a Transition Year
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
2010 Science CSCOPE Support
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Developing Questioning Skills
Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Session 1, Planning Skills Instruction
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
MAIN MENU 1. Introduction 2. Unit Info 3. Unit Overview 4. Subtasks
A Content Comprehension Program that teaches students to 1
NEISD Testing Services
Introduction to Extended Reflection 1 Term 1, Development Day 1
Presentation transcript:

Please log-in. http://www.teksresourcesystem.net/ Looking at the STAAR reasons we fail Please log-in. http://www.teksresourcesystem.net/ Presenter Notes: Change the title page to reflect session grade and content. Add presenter info prior to session. Do not change master on the Google group only on your version for the day. Internal Google Group files: various versions of PPTs, lesson samples, Planning Process Checklist *External Google Group files: One-pager T-TESS Dimensions Components Document Lesson Samples Planning Process Checklist *(Encourage participants to use this group. We will be sending news blasts and newsletters directly to teachers through this venue.) jstrom@esc19.net Jeffrey Strom Title: Looking at the STAAR reasons we fail Grade-band: 3-Alg. 1 Scheduled Time: Session 1 (Tuesday, August 1) 1:00 – 2:15 PM  

Key Concepts How can we find a deeper understanding of STAAR questions? How do the “words” affect the questions? How does the Blooms or DOK level of a question affect the outcome? How often does each SE appear? What about the SE’s that never appear? How does your class stack up against statewide percentages? Presenter Notes: Change the title page to reflect session grade and content. Add presenter info prior to session. Do not change master on the Google group only on your version for the day. Internal Google Group files: various versions of PPTs, lesson samples, Planning Process Checklist *External Google Group files: One-pager T-TESS Dimensions Components Document Lesson Samples Planning Process Checklist *(Encourage participants to use this group. We will be sending news blasts and newsletters directly to teachers through this venue.)

What does the TEKS Resource System offer us to help answer those questions? Areas of interest: Enhanced TEKS clarification Document (ETCD) Formative Spiral Items Unit Assessments Items STAAR Blue Prints with Item Percentages

Breaking down the failure by thinking of 6 sections: Standards Leveling Vocabulary Distractors Answer Follow up

Go To http://www.teksresourcesystem.net Navigate to the Resources in a grade level of your choice. Open the “Blueprint and Item Percentages” document. You will also be going to the YAG to find what unit the standard is in and then navigating to the STAAR analysis for that unit/standard to view the actual question. Once they are here we will go through the next slides and answer the questions on each slide referencing the system documents. Look for big steps in percentages! Looking over the document do you notice large steps in percentages?

Things to consider with Standards: What TEKS are being assessed? Is it Readiness or Supporting? Is the item aligned with the corresponding TEKS? Exactly what part of the TEKS is actually being assessed? In what units (IFDs) are the assessed TEKS being taught? How often has the TEK been assessed? How does this standard show up in the ETCD?

Things to consider with Leveling: What is the Revised Bloom’s level? What is the DOK level? The system provides the reference material for this: Resources- STAAR analysis resources-Guide to using the STAAR analysis resources mathematics

Things to consider in the Vocabulary: Is there vocabulary within the item (stem and answer choices) that needs to be highlighted? Is there specific vocabulary within the problem statement that might prove difficult? Are there any misconceptions that students may have when faced with this type of question? What background knowledge might students need have to aid in comprehension? Are there any particular strategies or skills that students would need to know in order to be successful answering this type of item? Is there something particularly unusual about the question?

Describe the distractors? Are they true/false, plausible? Things to consider with the distractors: (be in the mind of the test writer): Describe the distractors? Are they true/false, plausible? Where are they found in the problem statement? What text evidence might support the answer? What TEKS are they addressing? Why would a student choose a particular answer? What information (or misinformation) may have influenced the choice?

Things to consider with the answer: What is the question asking the student to do and/or to think? What text evidence from the problem supports the correct answer? What is the correct answer? What does the data show? What information/visual/graphic did students need to pay attention to in order to answer the question? How does local data compare with state data?

Things to consider as a follow up: How might this information affect curriculum (e.g., sequencing, pacing, essential/key understandings, vocabulary, etc.)? How might this information affect instruction (e.g., activities, questioning, resources, literature selections, etc.)? How might this information affect local assessment (e.g., formative assessment, performance assessments, unit assessments, etc.)?

Key Concepts in review…..reasons we fail… Do we find a deeper understanding of STAAR questions? How do the “words” affect the questions? How does the Blooms or DOK level of a question affect the outcome? How often does each SE appear? What about the SE’s that never appear? How does your class stack up against statewide percentages? Are there going to be changes in your classroom strategies? Presenter Notes: Change the title page to reflect session grade and content. Add presenter info prior to session. Do not change master on the Google group only on your version for the day. Internal Google Group files: various versions of PPTs, lesson samples, Planning Process Checklist *External Google Group files: One-pager T-TESS Dimensions Components Document Lesson Samples Planning Process Checklist *(Encourage participants to use this group. We will be sending news blasts and newsletters directly to teachers through this venue.)

Additional thoughts and concerns?