RHIC Magnets for JLEIC Yuhong Zhang May 11, 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12 PERIOD HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren November 10, 2011.
Advertisements

Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Internal target option for RHIC Drell-Yan experiment Wolfram Fischer and Dejan Trbojevic 31 October 2010 Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2017
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
JLEIC SC Magnets: Replace SF and High CM Energy Needs
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Update on MEIC Activities at ANL
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Deuteron and Small Aperture
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
The Feasibility of Using RHIC Magnets for MEIC and Cost Impact
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov, M-H. Wang (SLAC)
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Arc FODO Cell Inventory
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
JLEIC SC Magnets: Replace SF and High CM Energy Needs
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
Update on the High Energy Booster Design
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
An Alternative Ion Complex Agenda /some preliminary estimations/
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
MOPRB098 An Increased Extraction Energy Booster Complex For The Jefferson Lab Electron Ion Collider* Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport.
Presentation transcript:

RHIC Magnets for JLEIC Yuhong Zhang May 11, 2018

Motivation We were asked recently by the lab management to explore Whether the RHIC magnets can be used to build the JLEIC ion collider ring without any constraint (dimensions and fit to site, etc.)

Basic Information about RHIC Magnets Magnetic length m 9.45 Physical length 9.7 Magnetic field T 0.4 – 3.46 (3.78) Bending radius 243 Bending angle deg 2.23 Mechanical sagitta mm 48.5 Good field width 66 Ramp rate T/s 0.042 Temperature K 4.6 FODO cell length 29.62 Packing factor 0.638 Proton energy GeV 29 – 250 (275)

JLEIC Proton Ring with RHIC Magnets by RHIC Magnets JLEIC baseline Dipole bending radius m 243 177 133 90 Max. proton energy GeV 275 200 151 102 100 Figure-8 angle deg 130 115 77 77.4 Arc radius 381 277 209 141 Arc length M 1197 2061 1428 1019 633 823 Straight length 240x6 355 354 350 292 Conference 3833 4832 3564 2737 1975 2230 Footprint: length 1220 2443 1871 1505 1189 762 555 417 282 Electron spin rotators and CCB in arc are not considered/included

Deep Tunnel R. Rimmer 2.25 times p 275 GeV

Small Apertures for Cooled Beam design orbit (0=243 m) 0 0 d L0 L d0 (9.45 m, bent w/ 4.85 cm sagitta) new orbit   Good field RHIC proton beam has no cooling  emittance is large (~20 µm 95%)  Average beam size 4 mm JLEIC ion beam is cooled, beam size at injection is < 1.6 mm JLEIC requirement of physical aperture could be a factor of 2 smaller than RHIC With a same aperture, magnet bending radius can be reduced substantially, to give more room for sagitta  243 m  139 m

JLEIC Proton Ring with RHIC Magnets by RHIC Magnets JLEIC baseline Dipole bending radius m 243 177 133 90 Max. proton energy GeV 275 200 151 102 100 Figure-8 angle deg 130 115 77 77.4 Arc radius 381 277 209 141 Arc length M 1197 2061 1428 1019 633 823 Straight length 240x6 355 354 350 292 Conference 3833 4832 3564 2737 1975 2230 ratio 2.2 1.6 1.2 ~1 Footprint: length 1220 2443 1871 1505 1189 762 555 417 282

Deep Tunnel Site-Filler R. Rimmer P: ~200 GeV 1.5 times

Cut-open Tunnel 1.2 times P: ~150 GeV

DESY Experience: Straighten the HEAR SC Magnet Cold Mass A. Hutton HERA SC magnets: 8.8 m, curved dipole. vacuum chamber 55 mm For ALPS (Any Light Particle Search) project: effective aperture is only 35 mm using HERA SC magnets To increase aperture, the magnet cold mass is straightened using mechanical force Idea: bend the RHIC dipole cold mass to gain more aperture, thus the bending radius can be reduced RHIC magnet can reach up to 4.6 T (33% more) HERA Magnet RHIC Magnet

Summary The “direct” use of RHIC SC magnets for the JLEIC ion collider requires a very large footprint, its circumference is about 4.8 km, 2.2 times of the present JLEIC baseline and also large than the RHIC circumference. This can only be realized by a deep tunnel using a tunneling machine Taking advantage of a pre-cooled JLEIC beam (thus requiring smaller physical aperture), the RHIC SC magnets can be used creatively with a smaller footprint To reach 200 GeV, the ring circumference is about 3.6 km, 1.6 times of the JLEIC baseline, and similar than the RHIC tunnel, could be a site filler with deep tunnel To reach 150 GeV, the ring circumference is about 2.7 km, 1.2 times of the JLEIC baseline, it could be a site filler with a normal depth tunnel done by a cut-and-cover method To reach 100 GeV, the ring circumference is similar to the present JLEIC baseline An new idea of physically bending the RHIC SC magnet cold mass was discussed for enlarging the aperture while strongly bending the ion beams