Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to survive your viva Chris Park – Director, Graduate School.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Monash University Graduate Research Program in Literary and Cultural Studies The Confirmation.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Research Students Centre CRICOS No 00213J Surviving Confirmation Semester 2 Gardens Point.
Departmental/Divisional Administrator Briefing
The End Game How to Submit Your Thesis Margaret Haldane.
School of Physiotherapy Curtin University of Technology You are considering undertaking PhD or MSc by research study at the School of Physiotherapy Read.
Psychology Graduate Student Orientation. Graduate Students.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT FORM
UoB monitoring expected contact and reporting to the UKBA PBS monitoring stakeholder group meeting 16 th March 2010.
Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104.
Almost PhinisheD? Prof Alan Kelly, Dean of Graduate Studies Prof David Ryan, School of History Helen Buckley, Graduate Studies Office.
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI BOARD OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES University of Nairobi ISO 9001: Certified THE PROCESS OF EXAMINATION OF.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
Research Project or Thesis Proposal MT, MA and PhD
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
MSc STUDENTS MUST REGISTER VIA MINERVA FOR EPIB 690 or BIOS 690 (THESIS COMPONENT – REQUIRED COURSE) Only register for this course ONCE.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
What Expectations Does the University have of Supervisors? Professor Rod Devenish, Academic Director, MIGR.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Student Employment Process, Procedures, Roles and Responsibilities St. Petersburg College.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Research Examiner/ Independent Chair Training Programme
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Governing Body Reconstitution Briefing for Schools 24 September 2014.
Independent Chairs for Research Degree Examinations.
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
STUDENT FACULTY / ITP COMMITTEE SENATE START 2. Look for company for ITP placement END 1. Generate the list of eligible students for ITP and conduct briefing.
Approaching your final years of research Kate Marsh Faculty Director of Postgraduate Research, Humanities & Social Sciences.
Peer reviewer Workshop Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hussein Mahmoud El Magraby National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project.
West Virginia University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Transforming Graduate Education and Research.
ENROL PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT THESIS SUBMISSION ORAL EXAMINATION Suspension of study Change of supervisor Study away from Christchurch Extension.
Academic Staff Performance Review This package will introduce you to the Academic Staff Performance Review process undertaken here at Griffith University.
Introduction to the Doctoral Training Centre (DTC) for Transart Institute doctoral students.
A Logistical Guideline to Preparing, Researching, Writing and Defending Your Thesis in the Community College Leadership Programme Joseph Mior, Ed.D Sir.
Research Student Supervision – Update 2012 Dr Ann Hartley.
Dissertation Guidelines for Students MSc in Econ; MSc EIFE 2016/2017
Graduate Student Academic Services would like to present
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Progress Review.
Approval of Assessments
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
SUPERVISORS INFORMATION SESSION
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Annual Assessment of Progress 2017/18 Briefing for Research Students Research Student Registry Mar/Apr 2018.
PRC Information Session
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
ATF MEMBER TRAINING ACADEMIC YEAR.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Approval of Assessments
Progress Review.
External Examiner Reports
Progression and Advancement
Progress Review.
Assessment and completion
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
GRADUATION INFORMATION MEETING
Preparing for upgrade Dr Alex Mermikides 1.
Presentation transcript:

Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019 These are the formal issues from the SHU regulations for preparation for Doctoral Examination

Formal Criteria for choosing examiners. Adapted from the SHU Regulations.

Examiners Size and composition of examining team A candidate must be examined by at least two and normally not more than three examiners At least one must be an external examiner. Examiners must be experienced in research in the general area of the candidate's thesis and (where possible) have experience as a topic specialist At least one external examiner must have substantial experience of examining research degree candidates. Where this is not possible RDC may exercise its discretion in ensuring the team has relevant experience No candidate for a research degree may act as an examiner.

Examining Team R13.1 Size and composition of examining team   A candidate must be examined by at least two and normally not more than three of whom at least one must be an external examiner. The examining team must have suitable experience and expertise, be unbiased, and be clearly independent of the supervisor, of the student, and of each other in order that no conflicts of interest arise.

External Examiners Internal examiners Examining team External examiners must be independent of SHU/ Collaborating Organisation. Must not have acted as the candidate's supervisor or adviser Former members of staff or students normally not approved until three years after termination of association with SHU. RDC ensures that external examiner is not approved so frequently that familiarity might prejudice objective judgement. Internal examiners An internal examiner is defined as an examiner who is a member of staff of the University (or candidate's Collaborating Organisation). Members of the supervisory team cannot examine that candidate. When candidate and internal examiner are both from the same organisation, a second external must be appointed to ensure objectivity prevails in the examination.

Setting up the examination Adapted from the SHU Regulations.

The examiners The DoS must seek RDC approval for the examination arrangements (the examining team and thesis title): Normally no later than four months before expected date of submission of thesis. The examination may not take place until the examination arrangements have been approved by RDC (or chair) Briefing of examiners: SHU Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees) staff in Registry Services sends thesis to each examiner, together with the examiner's preliminary report form, with regulations and briefing guidelines.

The examiners (cont) Completion of examiners’ preliminary reports SHU Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees) staff in Registry Services ensures examiners have returned preliminary reports normally 1 week before the oral takes place. Each examiner must consider whether the thesis provisionally satisfies the requirements of the degree, and where possible, make an appropriate provisional recommendation subject to the outcome of any oral examination.

Preparation for examination Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees) staff in Registry Services notifies the candidate of the procedure for submission of the thesis and any conditions. The Director of Studies has responsibility to agree the date, time and location of the examination. In some faculties this process is undertaken by the Research Administrator SHU Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees) staff in Registry Services will notify the candidate, supervisors and the examiners of the date of the oral examination.

Submission of the thesis Adapted from the SHU Regulations.

Submission of the thesis The candidate must ensure that the thesis is submitted to SHU Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees) staff in Registry Services - based in the Oneleven Building at City Campus The submission of the thesis for examination is at the sole discretion of the candidate. Although a candidate would be unwise to submit the thesis against the advice of the supervisors, it is his/her right to do so. Candidates should not assume that a supervisor's agreement to submission guarantees the award of the degree.  The candidate must satisfy any conditions of eligibility for examination required by the University.

Submission of the thesis The candidate must take no part in the arrangement of the examination and must have no formal contact with the external examiner(s) between the appointment of the examiners and the oral examination. The candidate must confirm, that the thesis has not been submitted for a comparable academic award The candidate will not be precluded from incorporating in the thesis work which has already been submitted for a degree or comparable award, provided that it is indicated, on the declaration form and also in the thesis, which work has been so incorporated.

Format of the documentation The candidate must ensure that the format of the document/s as submitted for examination and as finalised following examination, is in accordance with the requirements of the University's regulations The Research Degree Thesis Guidelines 2017-18 provide information to candidates on all research degrees about the thesis submission and formatting requirements

Final Thesis the University now promotes the submission and preservation of e-theses as the final Version of Record instead of the previously required hard-bound purple copy Candidates will need to complete a Thesis Deposit Agreement (TDA) and submit it together with the electronic version of record of their thesis as a PDF/A file to rdcadmin@shu.ac.uk. Candidates who complete a practice-based research degree with supporting creative outputs should submit these to Student Systems and Records (Research Degrees). SSR staff will forward them to the Library who will store these in the Library Special Collections.

E-theses E-theses will be made available via the University's Research Archive (SHURA, https://shura.shu.ac.uk) and an electronic copy of the thesis will also be included in the British Library Electronic Theses Online Service (EThOS http://ethos.bl.uk) The candidate's Director of Studies is responsible for sending a link to the thesis to any Collaborating Organisation The Research Degree Thesis Guidelines 2017-18 also include information on embargo periods, confidentiality and copyright. Further guidance is available from the Library at http://blogs.shu.ac.uk/libraryresearchsupport/your-thesis/.