PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht- Pery**, MD Comparison of Tecnolas and Allegretto laser in situ keratomileusis.

Advertisements

ME5888. Night Carrier Operations Spectacles ME5888.

GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD

Refractive Surgery Seminar: An Introduction to Laser Vision Correction Emily Birkholz, MD John Hoines, MD Ophthalmology Associates of Mankato.

Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,

Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,

Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.

Tarek Abdel-Wahab, MD Clear Vision Center Cairo,Egypt Clinical Consultant of Schwind and technolase.

Comparison of Early Outcomes of Topo-Guided PRK With Two Refractive Lasers WCC 2015 San Diego, California Simon P. Holland MB. FRCSC,FRCS,MRCP 1, 2, A,

IN THE NAME OF GOD All-in-one Femtosecond Laser Refractive Surgery Sh.Hanjani, M.D Ophthalmologist.

Laser Vision Correction for Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism with CustomVis Solid State Laser (213nm) THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN.

Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)

PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series

Correction of Astigmatism with Toric IOL After Previous RK

Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation

Professor Ioannis Pallikaris MD, PhD.  Different mediums (Nd:YAG Crystals vs ArF Gas)  Less optics for the shaping of the pulse  No use of toxic gasses.

Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,

Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,

US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2009 ISRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day San Francisco - October 24, 2009.

ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.

Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Henry.

March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:

Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.

Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.

Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,

Retrospective Comparison of Flap Complications in LASIK Using Hansatome Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser Majid Moshirfar, MD Jeffrey P Gardiner,

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,

Management of Astigmatism - An overview

Custom Topographic Neutralizing Technique (TNT) with Topographically-Guided (TG) laser to correct complications David T.C Lin Simon Holland ASCRS 2010.

Case report No financial interest The features of the Femtosecond Laser system flap creation process on the eye after radial keratotomy O.F. Ziiatdinova,

Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,

Corneal Endothelial Cell Changes After LASIK Using a Femtosecond Laser Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama, MD, Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama,

Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.

Initial clinical experience with the FS200 Femto and EX500 excimer lasers for LASIK ASCRS, San Diego 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical.

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Decentration With and Without Active Eye-Tracking System Mark Edmund Johnston MD FRCSC P 167: The author.

FAQ OF LASIK EYE SURGERY

Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.

William W. Culbertson, MD Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL

Prophylactic collagen cross-linking (pCXL) in high risk (HR) LASIK

Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront

L. Espandar, MD ; M. D. Mifflin, MD; M. Moshirfar MD, FACS

How is the real final outcome of these eyes?

Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,

Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D

Comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with the Verisyse Phakic Intraocular Lens in High Myopia Jigna Joshi MD Marian Macsai MD Parag Majmudar.

LASIK Application in High Myopic Eyes; 10 Years Survey

No financial interest for all authors

Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera En México

Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?

Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08 A. John Kanellopoulos,

Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.

First 10 Cases with 150 kHz Intralase Enabled Keratoplasty (IEK) Compared to Standard Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) Christopher L. Blanton, M.D. Financial.

The authors have no financial interest to disclosure

SurgiVision® DataLink Study Group

US TRENDS IN REFRACTIVE SURGERY: 2000 ASCRS SURVEY

V isual Outcomes and Complications of Mini-Enhancements after Refractive Surgery Lichtinger A, MD; Purcell TL, Ph.D; Bernabe-Ko J, MD; Schanzlin DJ, MD.

Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK

Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System

Satisfaction Survey of Presbyopic LASIK Patients Up to 11 Years Postop

Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt

University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center

Marotte D, Denoyer A, Pisella PJ.

BOGOTA LASER REFRACTIVE INSTITUTE

90, 100 & 110 Micron Flap Using Small Bubble Femtosecond Laser

Presentation transcript:

PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California Comparing PRK, Microkeratome LASIK, and IntraLASIK for Correction of Post Radial Keratotomy Refractive Errors PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California *Dr. Binder is a paid consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. and is Owner of Outcomes Analysis Software

Purpose: To evaluate three approaches to treat post-radial keratotomy refractive errors: Surface Ablation, Mechanical Microkeratome LASIK, Femtosecond LASIK (IntraLASIK). Methods: One surgeon. Retrospective database analysis of 105 eyes that received one of the three approaches: PRK (27 eyes), microkeratome LASIK (MK) (49 eyes), IntraLASIK (IL) (29 eyes). PRK performed with out MMC; mechanical MK and IntraLase w 160 um attempted flap thickness. Results: 51 eyes w Hyperopic astigmatism: All 3 had improved UCVA and slight loss of 1-2 lines of BSCVA. PO MRSE was -0.21, -0.46 and -0.88 for PRK, MK, IL. Increase in Mean K was 1.45 D, 1.12 D and 3.06 IL. 34 w myopic astigmatism:Smallest loss of BSCVA w IL. PO MRSE was -0.41 D, -0.51 D, and -0.46 D for PRK, MK, and IL. Reduction in Mean K was 0.53 D, 0.73 D, and 2.04 D respectively. “Pizza pie” in 7 MK and 2 IL cases. Enhancements more difficult for LASIK cases. Conclusions: All three procedures had a loss of 1-2 lines of BSCVA but significant improvement in UCVA with similar refractive errors; greatest change in Mean K with IL. PRK had best results for hyperopic astigmatism, IL for myopic astigmatism. No clear winner between these approaches based on analysis of a heterogeneous RK population (differences in time from RK to surgery, no. of incisions, original refractive errors, patient age, previous RK enhancements, etc.)

Methods Excimer Lasers: Summit Apex Plus, LADARVision 4000, VISX S2-4, Allegretto 200 Microkeratomes: ACS, SKBM, BD 4000 160 um flaps were attempted Femtosecond Laser: IntraLase 10-60 kHz

Surgical Indications Under or overcorrected RK/AK eyes >5 years after surgery No external disease No keratometry or pupil selection No restriction based on BSCVA No RK/AK wound epithelialization Excluded cases with diurnal refractive change >1 D

Results: Eyes Operated Hyperopic Astigmatism Presented Total Eyes Hyperopic Astigmatism Myopic Hyperopia Myopia PRK 27 18 7 1 MK LASIK 49 21 15 6 5 IntraLase LASIK 29 12 3 Totals 105 51 34 8 9

Smaller is better

Smaller is better

Steeper is better

% %

Complications One slipped flap w SKBM MK Three “Pizza Pie”: 2 MK, 1 IL Enhancements: PRK = 5 MK = 7 IL = 2

Conclusions: Treatment of Refractive Errors after RK There are many variables in the PostOp RK eye to consider; a much larger series is required to stratify these variables Similar improvement in Mean K, UCVA BSCVA, SphEq. Greater Loss ≥ 2 Lines BSCVA w IL and MK vs PRK, but numbers too small to be statistically significant PRK best ± 0.5 D for Hyperopic Cyl; IL best for Myopic Astigmatism IL with fewest enhancements No clear “Winner”