Cem Data Analysis And Use

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Data Submissions Washington, DC June 10, 2004 Presenter: Ujjval Shukla U.S. EPA.
Advertisements

VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Development of an Ozone Screening Tool for the Midwest Alexander Cohan 1, Scott Leopold 2, Greg Yarwood 3, Kirk Baker 4 1 LADCO 2 Illinois EPA 3 ENVIRON.
Midwest RPO Nonroad Project Mark Janssen - MWRPO.
CONCEPT Emissions Model: Expanding Transparency, Improving Flexibility, Improving science Mark Janssen – LADCO CMAS CONFERENCE October 6-8, 2008 Chapel.
ERTAC EGU Growth Model Executive Summary September
Talat Odman and Yongtao Hu, Georgia Tech Zac Adelman, Mohammad Omary and Uma Shankar, UNC James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia DNR.
Laura Boothe Attainment Planning Branch Supervisor January 11, 2012.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System CERR Workshop San Francisco May E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.
Improvements in Emissions and Modeling of OC and SVOC from Onroad Mark Janssen – LADCO, Mike Koerber – LADCO, Chris Lindjem – EVIRON, Eric Fujita – DRI.
Open Emissions Model(OPEM) Emissions Model for Models3/CMAQ and CAMX Mark Janssen – LADCO/MWRPO Zion Wang – UC Riverside
Recent Developments in the Community Emissions Model CONCEPT 5 th Annual CMAS Model User Conference Tuesday October 17, 2006 Mark Janssen LADCO.
Status of ERTAC EGU Growth Committee September 16 th 2013.
Building A Better Ammonia Inventory Mark Janssen – LADCO/Midwest RPO.
Emission Inventory Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP/TAMS Center.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) Status of 3SAQS Air Quality and Emissions Modeling University of North Carolina.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Improving Data Quality in CEIDARS Vijay Bhargava Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
1 Emissions Modeling Survey Results Marc Houyoux, US EPA Presentation to the RPO National Workgroup November 4-6, 2004 St. Louis, Missouri.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 1 EDMS Purpose Regional Haze Rule Implementation Performance Monitoring Region-Wide Emission Inventory Analysis of Collected.
Air Quality Modeling of PM2.5 Species Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium & Midwest RPO 10/21/2002.
EMISSIONS INVENTORY UPDATE Briefing for OTC Committees and Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, DC Julie McDill & Susan Wierman 1.
Overview of Future Year Emissions Processing for CMAQ Modeling Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department.
Goals of this Session: Updates from August 2011 and upcoming release Job action and potential yearend problems Yearend/Year Start Things to Remember Other.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Midwest RPO Area Source EI Comparability Project Mark Janssen – LADCO.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
VISTAS Use of CEM Data and CEM Cross-Referencing Activities Presented by: Gregory Stella VISTAS Technical Advisor – Emission Inventories Alpine Geophysics,
1 Recent MANE-VU Projections of Visibility for 2018 Gary Kleiman MANE-VU Stakeholder Briefing April 4, 2008 BWI.
MANE-VU 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Megan Schuster Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting Austin, TX February 2005.
National RPO Technical Meeting June 9, 2005 Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Growth and Control for LADCO Round2 Modeling
Examples, examples: Outline
VISTAS Use of CEM Data and CEM Cross-Referencing Activities
EPA Tools and Data Update
Overview of Emissions Processing for the 2002 Base Case CMAQ Modeling
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
Assess variability from year to year: 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015
Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid
Emissions Tracking and Types of Emission Estimates
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Assess variability from year to year: 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015
Background High Electric Demand Day (HEDD) Initiative
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
ERTAC EGU Overview For the 2016 EGU workgroup
Horndon SMER 29th November 2011.
EGU Workgroup: 2016 beta Approach: Status: Next Steps / Milestones:
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update
SMOKE Improvements in version 2.0
Importance of Offroad to Ozone Formation in Midwest
2002 National Emission Inventory (NEI)
E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.
RMC Activity Update Emissions Forum July 1, 2003.
Midwest RPO Fires Status
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
A summary by 2017 Report.
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

Cem Data Analysis And Use Mark Janssen – Midwest RPO

Emissions Modeling Domain

LADCO Inventory August 1999, January 2000 Future CEM for annual 2002 run when data available. Anthropogenic emissions based on USEPA’s 1999 National Emissions Inventory Version 2

Version 2 NEI Issues Point Sources State ID’s replace ORIS ID’s Temporal still weak in NEI, Flat Few unreasonably high values in Florida, Michigan, and Colorado – Fixed/Removed EGU inventory 6-7000 Tons/Day NOX lower than V2 Draft (removed double counting)

Using the Raw CEM Data Prepare NIF2.0 model-ready point source emission files based on 1998 - 2000 CEM data Need to match ID’s with 1999 NEI at LADCO NEI base on State ID’s, CEM based on ORIS ID’s Matching good for midwest, Poor elsewhere. Huge 14Gig per year in NIF.

Report of CEM with no match in NEI for August 1999 IL 5.6 TPD IN .6 TPD MI 13 TPD Eckert & Moores Park Station? OH 1.5 TPD WI 1.4 TPD That’s real good! Deleware/Nebraska lost over 50% of CEM Mass.

Dealing with Blanks What to do about Missing or Zero Data Blank emission records common. New Tools replace blank records with zero emissions where there are pre-existing CEM records for that month Lessens overall Point NOX Tons/Day variability BaseB(24,500-37,800)~32000 Midpoint NOX TPD BaseD(21,600-32,700)~25000 Midpoint NOX TPD

Unadjusted CEM emissions not corrected for blanks

CEM Sensitivity (aug 99) PPB

Why build Temporal Profiles From CEM? CEM data is great for base year model validation. Answers the question: Can this photochemical/emissions modeling system duplicate reality CEM Can Not be used in future year modeling. If facilty XYZ was closed on July 16th 2002 will it be closed on July 16th 2018? So we must create conceptual and computation models to mimic the behavior of facilities so we can build appropriate future year inventories.

EH Pechan Temporal Effects Based on 1998 - 2000 CEM data, create day-of-week and hourly profiles Put Pechan profiles into models as NIF2.0 Point “EP” record types. Ran with Version 2 of NEI99 Raw Pechan data has Hourly Profiles by day of week and season LADCO used Wednesday value for all days by season Raw Pechan data has day of week by season. Used Raw Pechan Data

Foundations of Future Temporal Models Using 1998-2002 data to identify variations in load/emissions to classify as base load, peeking unit , or somewhere in between. Establish month of year and hour of day profiles to show variability in emissions base on CEM Apply temperature corrections on top of these to reflect daily min/max. Identify units that are likely to change from peaking to base load based on growth assumptions. Change their temporal attributes to match.

NOx as a Function of Temperature—Blr A

NOx as a Function of Temperature—Blr B

NOx as a Function of Temperature—Blr F

MWRPO Future directions Reanalyze 1998 – 2002 when it becomes available from EPA in RPO format. Build profile generation tools we run ourselves to allow iterative process Do new modeling (Base F?) Work with MWRPO stakeholders to see how our predictions work?