PAPER NUMBER 98 Disposal project for LLW and VLLW generated from research facilities in Japan: A feasibility study for the near surface disposal of VLLW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation of Low Level Waste Management
Advertisements

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D1- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES  Why is the NPP decommissioning required / necessarily?  How.
Near Surface Disposal Facilities
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Options for Disposal of Active Material Dr. Brian Heaton Aberdeen Radiation Protection Services Ltd.
Exemption, Clearance, Discharges
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions Day 8 – Lecture 5(2)
Update on progress with development of DS459
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
11 The legal framework on the disposal of intermediate level waste in Russian Federation Scientific and Engineering centre for Nuclear and.
Radiation Peter Lee. Radiation Radiation is energy that may take such forms as light, or tiny particles much too small to see. Visible light, the ultra-violet.
Nuclear Waste Storage in Utah!. Clive Storage Facility (Energy Solutions)  In 1990 Energy Solutions was permitted to treat and dispose of Class A low.
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.2. Principles of radioactive waste management Basic technical management solutions: concentrate and contain, storage.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Introduction Radioactive waste in Iraq arises mainly from decommissioning of destroyed nuclear facilities and waste related to previous nuclear research.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
EXERCISE 1 GROUP : OPERATOR. Safety Case : Post Closure Of A Disposal Facility Introduction  The facility is situated in Vaalputs, South Africa.  It.
TDR CH 12 PUNCHLINES D. Ene TDR INTERNAL REVIEW Lund, Sweden
Structure of a Safety Case (NEA). The Multibarrier Concept each barrier acting passively in concert with the others to isolate, contain and reduce impacts.
Texas supports the requirement for a site-specific analysis and specific dose limit of 25 mrem/yr within the 1,000-year compliance period Texas.
HOW MUCH RADIOACTIVE WASTE COULD POTENTIALLY BE IMPORTED INTO TEXAS
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
International Approaches to Low-Level Waste Management and Disposal
Conceptual Landfill Design and Energy Recovery Potential for Greater Dammam Area AbdulRahman Al-Blooshi Umar I. Ahmed Wasi Ul.
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Summary of Nuclear Input for Safety Analysis for the DCLL TBM -update-
Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Implementation of the Revised Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning,
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING RADIOISOTOPE Mohd Abd Wahab Yusof (Dr) Malaysian Nuclear Agency.
Utah Division of Radiation Control
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIX Waste management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Report on the outcome from the consultancy
VARIABILITY OF INDOOR RADON LEVEL ACCUMULATION: A STUDY IN PORTUGUESE THERMAL SPAS S. Silva & M.L. Dinis 12 a 16 June de 2017.
Lisa Edwards Senior Program Manager LLW Forum April, 2017
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Updating the NRC’s Alternative Disposal Request Guidance Document
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Wolaita Sodo University Department of Physics , Wolaita Ethiopia Indoor radon concentration and its health hazard in the dwellings of Wolaita Sodo.
Colorado: Current Waste Disposal Approaches and Challenges
Remediation strategy and capping construction for the mill tailings pond, Ningyo-toge Uranium Mine, Japan ~ 11.8 ENVIRONET Annual Forum, IAEA.
EPRI Development of Nuclear Power Plant Implementation Guide for NRC Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Presented.
CN−242 03b–12/ID52 Exposure Scenario and Pathway
LLW Forum Meeting October 17, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia
AFPC Policy Protect its personnel, contractors,3rd parties and the environment against the hazards of exposure to ionizing radiation due to AFPC activities.
For more information, please visit the CAST website at:
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
Industry Input on NRC’s Low-Level Waste Program Strategic Assessment
Ella Simon, Alex Horb, Grant Steiner
Mike Garner Chair/Executive Director Northwest Compact
Industry Perspectives on Part 61 Rulemaking
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Comments on: EnergySolutions September 13th Presentation to the Waste Management and Radiation Control Board Prepared for:
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
Application of Mass-to-surface Ratio for Regulatory Clearance of VLLW Metal Radwastes at KAERI The nuclear facilities at Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2019 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Presentation transcript:

PAPER NUMBER 98 Disposal project for LLW and VLLW generated from research facilities in Japan: A feasibility study for the near surface disposal of VLLW that includes uranium Sakai1, M. Hasegawa1, Y. Sakamoto1, T. Nakatani1 Japan Atomic Energy Agency Japan Atomic Energy Agency plans to implement the near surface disposal of LLW and VLLW in Japan. Approximately 25% of the volume of VLLW is uranium-bearing waste. The calculated dose due to uranium and its progeny is estimated to reach its peak value beyond 10,000 years. The peak dose is a relatively larger value. Two safety measures to deal with this issue are discussed. First, dose assessment in the very conservative assumptions for long periods of time is performed. The implementer confirms that the calculated dose does not exceed 0.3mSv/y, (dose constraint), or 1 mSv/y (lower reference level for existing exposure). Second, the amount of uranium radioactivity disposed in a trench section is controlled to reduce the average uranium concentration in the section to lower than 1 Bq/g. The result considers the situation as an existing exposure situation. The possibility of a non-acceptable exposure situation is reduced, even if an extreme long-term exposure situation is assumed. Dose constraint Control period (50 years) Annual Radiation Dose (mSv/y) Conservative condition Likely condition *A section composed of VLL uranium-bearing waste, VLLW, and soil fill. Fig.2 Management concept for the average uranium radioactivity concentration for each section of waste layer. Time of scenario occurrence (year) Average concentration of total Uranium in waste is 10 Bq/g. The composition condition is the enriched uranium containing 5 wt% U-235 These results show that it is possible to safely implement the trench disposal of VLL uranium-bearing waste by adequately controlling the disposed radioactivity of uranium. Fig.1 Evaluated dose due to uranium from a residence scenario that assumes a different site situation.