Functional Heterogeneity of Mouse Prostate Stromal Cells Revealed by Single-Cell RNA-Seq  Oh-Joon Kwon, Yiqun Zhang, Yumei Li, Xing Wei, Li Zhang, Rui.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Identification of Bone Marrow-Derived Soluble Factors Regulating Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration  Tsung-Lin Tsai, Wan-Ju Li  Stem Cell.
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 146, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Regulation of Mammary Luminal Cell Fate and Tumorigenesis by p38α
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Christine V. Ichim, Džana D
Adult Murine Prostate Basal and Luminal Cells Are Self-Sustained Lineages that Can Both Serve as Targets for Prostate Cancer Initiation  Nahyun Choi,
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Laura S. Bisogno, Matthew B. Friedersdorf, Jack D. Keene
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Ex Vivo Expansion and In Vivo Self-Renewal of Human Muscle Stem Cells
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Wei Jiang, Yuting Liu, Rui Liu, Kun Zhang, Yi Zhang  Cell Reports 
Derivation and FACS-Mediated Purification of PAX3+/PAX7+ Skeletal Muscle Precursors from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Bianca Borchin, Joseph Chen, Tiziano.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Microglia
Identification of White Adipocyte Progenitor Cells In Vivo
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
A Long-Lived Luminal Subpopulation Enriched with Alveolar Progenitors Serves as Cellular Origin of Heterogeneous Mammary Tumors  Luwei Tao, Maaike P.A.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 12, Pages (February 2019)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Cellular Heterogeneity in the Mouse Esophagus Implicates the Presence of a Nonquiescent Epithelial Stem Cell Population  Aaron D. DeWard, Julie Cramer,
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
A New Long Noncoding RNA ALB Regulates Autophagy by Enhancing the Transformation of LC3BI to LC3BII during Human Lens Development  Qiuli Fu, Zhenwei Qin,
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Suchitra D. Gopinath, Ashley E. Webb, Anne Brunet, Thomas A. Rando 
Presentation transcript:

Functional Heterogeneity of Mouse Prostate Stromal Cells Revealed by Single-Cell RNA-Seq  Oh-Joon Kwon, Yiqun Zhang, Yumei Li, Xing Wei, Li Zhang, Rui Chen, Chad J. Creighton, Li Xin  iScience  Volume 13, Pages 328-338 (March 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032 Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

iScience 2019 13, 328-338DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 scRNA-seq Reveals Distinctive Subpopulations on Prostate Stromal Cells (A) Multidimensional scaling plot of scRNA-seq identifies five clusters of populations (R1–R5). (B) Heatmap showing clustering with top 200 highly expressed genes within each group. (C) Gene Ontology analysis of subpopulations of prostate stromal cells. (D) Heatmap of selected genes differentially expressed among prostate stromal subpopulations. See also Figure S1. iScience 2019 13, 328-338DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sca-1 and CD 90 Fractionates Prostate Stromal Cells (A) FACS plot shows that Sca-1 and CD90 fractionate four distinct subpopulations on prostate stromal cells. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of R1-cell-associated genes in FACS-sorted prostate stromal subpopulations. Results show means ± SEM from five independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of R2-cell-associated genes. Dot plot shows means ± SEM of relative expression to Gapdh (N = 5 each). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of hormone receptors. Dot plot shows means ± SEM of relative expression to Gapdh (N = 5 for S1 and S2 and N = 3 for S3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (E) Dot plot shows means ± SEM of percentage of BrdU+ cells in stromal subpopulations by flow cytometric analysis. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. BrdU, bromodeoxyuridine. See also Figure S2. iScience 2019 13, 328-338DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Anatomic Distribution and Hormonal Regulation of Distinct Prostate Stromal Cells (A) FACS plot shows that each lobe has different percentage of subpopulations. AP: anterior prostate, DP: dorsal prostate, LP: lateral prostate, VP: ventral prostate. (B) Bar graph shows means ± SEM of percentage of each subpopulation in different lobes from three independent experiments. (C) Coimmunostaining of CD34/CD90, CD34/Sca-1, and K14/CD34 in different prostate lobes. White arrow denotes that CD34+ stromal cells are located outside of CD90+ stromal cells. Scale bars, 100 μm. DLP: dorsolateral prostate. (D and E) (D) FACS plot and (E) bar graph show means ± SEM of percentages of individual subpopulations in prostate of castrated mice. (F) qRT-PCR analysis for representative genes associated with R1 and R2 cells in stromal subpopulations from intact and castrated mice. Dot plots show means ± SEM of relative expression to Gapdh. N=4. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S3. iScience 2019 13, 328-338DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 S2 Cells Suppress Bipotent Differentiation of Prostate Basal Cells (A) Dot plot shows means ± SD of organoid-forming units of basal cell (Ba) when cultured alone or with stromal subpopulation (S1, S2, or the mixture of S1 and S2). Results were from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05. (B) Dot plot shows means ± SD of organoid size. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. (C) Coimmunostaining of keratin 5 (K5) and keratin 8 (K8) in Type I and Type II organoids. Scale bars, 25 μm. (D) Coimmunostaining of K5 and K8 in organoids derived from basal cells when cultured alone or with stromal subpopulations. Pie charts quantify types of organoids. Scale bars, 50 μm. (E) Dot plot shows means ± SD of organoid-forming units from passaged organoid. ***p < 0.001. (F) Dot plot shows means ± SD of size of passaged organoid. *p < 0.05. (G) Pie charts quantify types of passaged organoids. See also Figure S4. iScience 2019 13, 328-338DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.032) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions