(mgCO2 – C/mg biomass/d)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

district of Himachal Pradesh

Percentage of Polyethylene

Properties Test results

Percentage composition (%)

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Properties of The Tested Soil

Tested % of gas and FMENV

Table 1. Seed storage information

Table 2. Physical properties of Portland cement

Figure 3. Mineralisation of 14C–phenanthrene in artificially spiked soils amended with 100 µg kg-1 (a) caffeic acid, (b) ferulic acid, (c) p-coumaric acid,

Mineralisation of 14C–phenanthrene

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Susceptibility Coefficient

Total Energy Consumed (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. women involvement in environmental management

Table 3. Educational Qualification of Respondance

Reservoir Capacity (m3)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

Age-sex literacy rates by various surveys.

Table 1. Total Microbial Counts of various samples

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

Age-sex employments by various surveys.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Inhibition of Pathogenic Bacteria by honey samples

Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Income and expenditure of CFUGs in Nepal

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 3. Main properties of the thin brass electrode

Soil around quarry mines

Environmental Priorities Environmental Impact Assessment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Degrading bacterial strains

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Bioaccumulation factors for heavy metals in rice crop

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si2

Moisture content (wt. %)

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Table 4. Main Features of Current Community Forestry in Nepal

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

Power per unit land or water area

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Ingredients/100g dry sample

Presentation transcript:

(mgCO2 – C/mg biomass/d) Table 3. Landuse change effect on selected biological soil properties Landuse type CTMB (mgCkg-1) CAMB CTMB/Corg (%) BR (mgCO2 C/kg/d) qCO2:T (mgCO2 – C/mg biomass/d) qCO2:A Natural forest 273.9 81.2 2.78 0.83 33.49 6.4 0.068 0.218 Reforested lands 324.6 66.5 4.33 0.89 48.81 8.8 0.072 0.244 Cultivated uplands 176.6 51.4 2.55 0.74 34.24 6.2 0.070 0.262 Swamps 298.2 43.0 5.53 0.79 69.34 5.5 0.056 0.158 Soil around quarry mines 155.0 37.4 3.78 0.91 41.44 4.0 0.049 0.109 Built-up Areas 92.7 17.8 2.27 0.44 52.08 2.6 0.031 0.076 Fallow lands 380.4 102.6 5.36 0.14 37.07 9.1 0.080 0.252 GTMB=Total microbial biomass; CAMB=Active microbial biomass; BR=Basal respiration; Corg=Total Organic Carbon; qCO2:T and qCO2:A=Specific maintenance respiration rates for GTMB and CAMB. Uquetan U. I. et al. Evaluation of Soil Quality in Relation to Landuse Effect in Akamkpa, Cross River State – Nigeria. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 2, 35-42. doi:10.12691/aees-5-2-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.