IETF 105 REGEXT Presenter: Gustavo Lozano

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IATI Technical Advisory Group Technical Proposals Simon Parrish IATI Technical Advisory Group, DIPR March 2010.
Advertisements

© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Registrant/User Classification & Current Practices Panel Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations October.
Generic Names Supporting Organisation Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council.
GNSO goals Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Sao Paulo, 4 Dec 2006.
Internationalizing WHOIS Preliminary Approaches for Discussion Internationalized Registration Data Working Group ICANN Meeting, Brussels, Belgium Jeremy.
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session 1 OGF25 – General Session 11:00-12:30, 3 March 2009 Catania.
Yunling Wang VoIP Security COMS 4995 Nov 24, 2008 XCAP The Extensible Markup Language (XML) Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP)
Draft Roadmap to Implement SAC 051 Steve Sheng, ICANN 1.
Introduction to WSDL presented by Xiang Fu. Source WSDL 1.1 specification WSDL 1.1 specification – WSDL 1.2 working draft WSDL.
SOAP.
CIS 375—Web App Dev II SOAP.
Topics Acronyms in Action SOAP 6 November 2008 CIS 340.
A Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) EWG Briefing for the IETF by Chris Disspain Monday Nov 4, 2013.
Massive Scale Name Management: Lessons Learned from the.COM Namespace Mark Kosters 20 Aug 1999.
AIHW Knowledgebase Redevelopment project Trish Ryan –Head, National Data Development Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare –
1Copyright © 2011, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary Status Report MFD Working Group February, 2011 Wailea, HI PWG F2F Meeting.
#ICANN51 1 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Activities Update ICANN Los Angeles Meeting October 2014 Chris Dillon.
Interim Report Review Inter-Registrar Domain Name Transfers ICANN DNSO Names Council Task Force on Transfers Public Discussion on Transfers of gTLD Names.
Overview What are the provisioning methods used in the Australian registry system? How are these provisioning systems secured?
IDN over EPP (IDNPROV) IETF BOF, Washington DC November 2004.
Organic Names Ltd.ORG Proposal Steve Dyer.
2 Dedicated to keeping the Internet secure, stable and interoperable Formed in 1998 as a not- for-profit public-benefit corporation Follows multistakeholder.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
Registration of IDN Language Tables John L. Crain Bangkok, CcTLD Training 2004 John L. Crain Bangkok, CcTLD Training 2004.
WebDAV Issues Munich IETF August 11, Property URL encoding At present, spec. allows encoding of the name of a property so it can be appended to.
Incident Object Description and Exchange Format
IAB Report Technical Plenary IETF 81 July 25, 2011.
© Copyright 2003, JPRS 1.JP IDN Implementation June 24, 2003 Hiro Hotta JPRS (Japan Registry Service) 日本レジストリサービス.jp/
IETF63 - enum WG1 ENUM validation architecture & friends Alex Mayrhofer enum.at / 3.4.e164.arpa Bernie Höneisen SWITCH.
SSAC Report on Domain Name Registration Data Model Jim Galvin.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
© 2004 VeriSign, Inc. Domain Registry Version 2 (DREG2) Andrew Newton 8 November 2005 IETF 64 CRISP Working Group Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Proposal for App Id and Service Provider Id registration Group Name: Shelby Source: Shelby, iconectiv / Ericsson,
1Copyright © 2010, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary Status Report MFD Working Group Decemberr, 2010 Irvine, CA PWG F2F Meeting.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF 32, Salt Lake City Guy Roberts, Inder Monga, Tomohiro Kudoh 16 th July 2011.
IDN UPDATE Tina Dam ICANN Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Public Forum, Wellington 30 March 2006.
Securing Future Growth: Getting Ready for IPv6 NOW! ccTLD Workshop, 8 th April 2011 Noumea, New Caledonia Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC.
Deployment of IDN In Korea Aug. 23, 2003 Korea Network Information Center.
Abierman-netconf-mar07 1 NETCONF WG 68 th IETF Prague, CZ March 19, 2007.
1/7 Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00 Mayumi Munakata (NTT) Shida Schubert (NTT) IETF67 SIPPING 1.
Deployment of IDN In Korea March 1, 2004 Korea Network Information Center.
1 The Internet Registry System Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC EC-POP Brussels 5 July 1999.
March 20, 2007BLISS BOF IETF-681 Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol.
Presentation at ISMS WG Meeting1 ISMS – March 2005 IETF David T. Perkins.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
1Copyright © 2010, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary Status Report MFD Working Group August, 2010 Bagsværd, DenmarkPWG F2F Meeting.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: September 16, 2010 Presented at IEEE session.
CSA WG Meeting 17 May 2011 Page 1 Berlin, Germany CSA WG Service Agreement Status Prepared by Hugh Kelliher Space ConneXions Limited
COM Agreement Thursday 1 Dec 2005, Vancouver. Underlying issues Settlement of ICANN/Verisign litigation or continue until ICANN wins in court Renewal.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-00 Volker Hilt Gonzalo Camarillo
IANA Numbering Services SLA John Curran ARIN CEO.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
New CNNIC 14 June 2016.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-02 Volker Hilt Jonathan Rosenberg Gonzalo.
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Two different issues ref. country codes
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Host of Troubles : Multiple Host Ambiguities in HTTP Implementations
Goals of soBGP Verify the origin of advertisements
PWG Plenary Status Report MFD Working Group
Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-00.
IDN Variant TLDs Program Update
Typical Life Cycle of a Domain Name
Typical Life Cycle of a Domain Name
حمایت از علائم تجاری در قانون تجارت الکترونیک ایران
IETF status of XML Security
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
Two different issues ref. country codes
Presentation transcript:

IETF 105 REGEXT Presenter: Gustavo Lozano Data Escrow drafts IETF 105 REGEXT Presenter: Gustavo Lozano

What is data escrow? The process of storing critical data (called deposit in the data escrow terminology) with a neutral third-party (i.e. data escrow agent). The third-party releases the deposit if certain conditions are met to the party defined in a legal document. The conditions could be for example: Service disruption. Financial issues.

Data escrow history in the TLD space The original .com, .net and .org agreements (1999) with ICANN contained provisions for registry data escrow. As part of the new gTLD program, a modern data escrow format was envisioned. A new format was defined, and the format is neutral to the transport mechanism.

History data escrow drafts IRDE BOF at the IETF 77. WG was not formed, but a mailing list (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire) was created and used for defining the specification. Participation on the Internet Registration Escrow (IRE) mailing list continued until 2015. The specifications are stable and only minimal updates have been made in the last couple of years.

History data escrow drafts First version (draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow) was published on July 6, 2010 Originally: draft-arias-noguchi-registry-data-escrow-00 On March 2012, the draft was split into two: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping (originally: draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects- mapping) On March 2013, draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping was merged with draft-gould-thippeswamy-dnrd-csv-mapping.

draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow This document specifies the format and contents of data escrow deposits targeted primarily for domain name registries. The specification was designed to be independent of the underlying objects that are being escrowed. The specification defines an optional set of objects to be deleted, and a set of objects to be inserted.

draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow The following attributes are defined per deposit: REQUIRED "type”, identifies the kind of deposit: FULL, INCR (Incremental) or DIFF (Differential). REQUIRED "id”, uniquely identify the escrow deposit. OPTIONAL "prevId”, identifies the previous incremental, differential or full escrow deposit OPTIONAL "resend”, incremented each time the escrow deposit failed the verification procedure at the receiving party.

draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow The following elements are defined per deposit: REQUIRED <watermark>, contains the date-time corresponding to the Timeline Watermark of the deposit. REQUIRED <rdeMenu>, contains the following child elements: REQUIRED <version>, identifies the the RDE protocol version. One or more <objURI>, contain namespace URI(s) representing the <contents> and <deletes> element objects.

draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping This document specifies the format, contents and semantics of Domain Name Registration Data (DNRD) Escrow deposits for a Domain Name Registry. Two formats are supported: XML CSV

draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping The following objects are defined in this document: Domain Name Host Contact Registrar IDN Table Reference NNDN (user for reserved domain names, withheld IDN variants, etc) EPP Parameters Policy Header

Who uses the data escrow format? Most gTLDs. Data escrow requirements. gTLD transitions. Data escrow agents. Nine escrow agents are approved to provide services in the gTLD space. Emergency Back-end Registry Operator (EBERO) providers. Three EBERO providers are available in the gTLD space. ICANN Bulk Registration Data Access (BRDA).

Future steps The two data escrow drafts appear to be ready for WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping