Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 3. Fee structure of some day care centers in Bangladesh

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Total Energy Consumed (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Instructional materials

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

in the last evaluation of the software

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 5. Comparison of Outcome of 138 patients

Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Table 2. Results of 24-hour air monitoring sampling in risk area

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Respondents Frequency

Average Execution Time in seconds

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report (2011-2013) Average Fall GPA Average Fall Earned Credit Hours Average Spring Earned Credit Hours Percentage of Students on Acad. Probation after Fall LLC Participants 2013 3.0711 14.61 14.42 10.91 On-campus Non-LLC 2013 2.77 13.7 16 Off-campus 2013 2.707 13 12.6 18 LLC Participants 2012 2.8851 13.94 13.97 19.93 On-campus Non-LLC 2012 2.673 12.9 13.2 Off-campus 2012 2.729 12.5 LLC Participants 2011 2.8548 13.91 13.89 15.72 On-campus Non-LLC 2011 2.75 13.5 13.4 Off-campus 2011 2.701 12.7 12.8 20 Tobin Richardson et al. The Experiences of Some Early and Elementary Education Living-Learning Community Participants. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 10, 856-861. doi:10.12691/education-2-10-3 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.