GRSG/VRU-Proxi Informal Working Group Japan Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonars November 21th 2017 Tokyo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
Advertisements

Justification to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2010/16 : Exterior courtesy lamps of the vehicle illuminate the surrounding field of the vehicle. This can assist.
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
® Microsoft Office 2010 Word Tutorial 3 Creating a Multiple-Page Report.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Practical Database Design and Tuning. Outline  Practical Database Design and Tuning Physical Database Design in Relational Databases An Overview of Database.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Transmitted by the representative of JAPAN Toward Realization of the “Mutual Recognition of International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA)” under the.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Concept of the exclusion of the blind area In Japan, it is predicted that, among accidents recorded during 8 years in the 1990s, five fatal accidents occurred.
PHOTOGRAPHY BASICS PARTS OF THE CAMERA AND HOW IT WORKS.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Starting note on gearshift issues
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Danger Zone Detection Beyond the Mirrors Presenter: Dave McDonald
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Practical Database Design and Tuning
On-board Technologies
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Japanese Emergency Exit Requirements
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
A Tutorial on How to Turn PowerPoint Presentations into Slideshows
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
The Importance of ADAS Technology
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
Report Task Force UNR46 5th Meeting OICA Paris, 26-27th September 2016
The driver’s looking back ocular points
Practical Database Design and Tuning
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Informal document GRSG
The driver’s looking back ocular points
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Proposal for amendment GTR No.6
Status report of “Reversing Motion”
On-board Technologies
Study about Audible Warning system effects for VRU safety
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
China Lighting Installation GB XX (1/4 )
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
VRU-Proxi Reversing Motion Regulation
SLR Rev.1 GTBWGSL 415 Regulation No. [LSD] – Stage II
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion”
Regulation No. 148 [LSD] – Stage II
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
AEBS-08 – Industry Input.
Chapter 8 Views and Indexes
Regulation No. 148 [LSD] – Stage II Side Parking lamps
“Class IX Front and Close-proximity Passenger-side”
Updates and discussion points for reversing motion
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE FREE FORM MIRRORS IN REG. ECE 46.06
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Advantages and Disadvantages
Informal document GRVA-04-34
Status of discussion after 8th meeting
Presentation transcript:

GRSG/VRU-Proxi Informal Working Group Japan Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonars November 21th 2017 Tokyo

Table of Contents Basic Ideas for Developing Technical Requirements on Sonars under GRSG Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonar system for VRUs detection

1. Basic Ideas for Developing Technical Requirements on Sonars under GRSG ISO 17386 (MALSO(*)) is a technical requirements on sonar system. As ISO 17386 is aimed for assisting driver to understand the distance to various objects, such as wall, thin pole, luggage carrier of truck, etc. in parking scene , some modification is necessary for the purpose of VRUs detection. Our proposal is to make new requirement based for the purpose of VRUs detection by modifying ISO 17386. *: MALSO: Maneuvering Aids for Low Speed Operation

Reference: ISO 17386 MALSO Rear Detection areas ○Outline of ISO 17386 Requirements on sonars and other sensing technologies Detection areas: Front, rear, corner  Requirements specified for each area (detection area, response time, etc.) Main rearward detection requirements Detection area: 1 m max. in the rear Detection area requirement: The area shall be divided into 0.1 x 0.1 m grids and a target (φ75 mm, H 1000 mm) shall be located there. Testing shall determine whether or not each grid can be detected. Detection latency: The detection latency standard for when the target appears within the area is also specified. Detection areas Rear Corner Front Image of a test in the rear horizontal area Detected Target Not Detected Vehicle 0.6 m 1 m

2. Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonars Modification points of ISO17386 for the purpose of VRUs detection ISO 17386 (Clause 5) Issue, etc. Proposals for technical requirements on sonar system for VRUs detection 5.1 System activation The automatic activation requirement is unnecessary except for reversing. Delete provisions except those related to reversing. 5.2 Driver interface and information strategy - (As per ISO’s requirements) 5.3 Dynamic performance of object detection 5.3.1 Relative velocity of objects 5.3.2 Start-up detection delay Add definition. 5.3.3 Detection latency The specified test procedures are not appropriate (unrealistic situation for VRUs detection). Newly specify realistic test procedures. The average detection latency requirement is unnecessary (because its purpose is to ensure merchantability). Delete the average detection latency requirement. 5.4 Monitoring range coverage 5.4.1 Sections of the monitoring range Two sections of the rear detection area (0.6 m or 1 m) Choose the 1-m section. 5.4.2 Horizontal areas of relevance This clause is unnecessary for VRUs detection (with many items that are redundant with Clause 5.4.3). Delete (and incorporate into Clause 5.4.3). 5.4.3 Rear horizontal area (Use Clause 7 for test procedures.) 5.4.4 Front horizontal area This requirement is unnecessary for VRUs detection (because it concerns areas other than the rear field of vision). Delete. 5.4.5 Corner horizontal areas This requirement is unnecessary for VRUs detection (because it concerns areas other than the rear field of vision and its purpose is to avoid property damage). 5.4.6 Minimum coverage ratios The requirement "no more than two contiguous detection holes" needs to be modified for VRUs detection. Relax the requirement to the size equivalent to that of a person. 5.4.7 Vertical areas of relevance This requirement is unnecessary for VRUs detection (because its purpose is to avoid property damage) . 5.5 Self-test capabilities and failure indication 5.6 Operation with trailers (See 2.1) (See 2.2.) (See 2.3.)

2.1. Detection Latency Test Procedures (1) ISO 17386 The target is dropped from a height of 1 m and the response time is measured (video camera image  audible warning). A situation where the detection target is landing from above is unrealistic for VRUs detection Video camera Target System warning height Audible warning system Microphone Detection area Dropped from a height of 1 m Recording

(2) Proposal for the response time measurement The system response time should be measured with the time duration from selecting the reverse gear to the warning activation for a stationary target placed in valuation area. Audible warning system Gearshift Target having been placed within the area in advance Recording Microphone Detection area Video camera Microphone Filming the gearshift lever operation and recording the audible warning

2.2. Minimum Coverage Ratios (1) ISO17386 ISO’s requirement “there shall be no more than two contiguous detection holes”(*1) is to avoid property damage by thin object such as pole. (2)Proposal for minimum coverage It is sufficient if the target covers grids equivalent to the size of a person for VRUs detection. Change to “no more than 2 x 2 undetected grids” which considered as equivalent to the size of a pedestrian. 0.1 m Image of the undetected grids requirement 0.1 m Target in the field of vision requirement: φ300 mm Proposal: No more than 2 × 2 undetected grids Detected Not Detected ISO’s requirement (No more than two contiguous detection holes) *1: Within the whole monitoring range, there shall be no more than two contiguous detection holes in a straight line, either horizontally, vertically or diagonally in the horizontal plane. *2: VRU-Proxi-02-03

2.3. Vertical Range Requirement (1)ISO 17386 Vertical range requirement (see below) is defined to avoid property damage by various object, such as luggage carrier of truck. (2)Proposal Delete vertical range test 0.8 m Target in the proposed field of vision requirement (H 1000 mm) 0.2 m 0.1 m 1 m ISO’s target

Supplementary Information

Reference: Reversing Speed Models Studied by ISO Speed at which the vehicle is 1 m from the object in the rear Speed (m/s) Model of speeds used by the driver Simplified model of speeds used by the driver Distance to the object (m) Source: The Commentary section of “JIS D 0803:0000 (ISO 17386:2010) Transport information and control systems - Manoeuvring Aids for Low Speed Operation (MALSO) - Performance requirements and test procedures”