Results for random clusters.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Force limits and layout design.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Velocity of hygrobots. Velocity of hygrobots. (A) The difference between l and lp corresponds to a distance that a hygrobot advances a period. (B) Velocity.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Spontaneous locomotion of hygrobots under spatial gradient of humidity

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

RBC microswimmers for active cargo delivery.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Force limits and layout design.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). (A)

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Folding unit based on the plane symmetric Bricard linkage.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Fig. 4 Control analyses ensured that the relation between rotational acceleration and changes in FA does not depend on thresholds. Control analyses ensured.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

Fig. 3 Load dependence of friction force and corresponding COF.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Fig. 3 ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds during the pretreatment and treatment periods. ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds.

Deformability and stability of RBC microswimmers squeezing through confined spaces smaller than their size. Deformability and stability of RBC microswimmers.

Fig. 4 Evolution of fraction of sickled RBCs under hypoxia.

Fig. 3 Characterization of the current-induced effective fields.

Fig. 4 Relationships between light and economic parameters.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

Fig. 4 Next-generation MOF with increased productivity.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Analysis of experimental results.

Fig. 4 Evolution of rate constants over varying interaction strengths.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Results for random clusters. Results for random clusters. Random aggregates composed of 100 identical spherical beads with kf = 1.2 (red squares) and 2.3 (gray circles) generated with PC aggregation algorithm. Empty symbols stand for a mean value averaged over 300 configurations, bars correspond to SD from the mean, and full symbols denote the maximum values. (A) Longitudinal rotation anisotropy parameter, p. (B) Transverse anisotropy parameter, ε. (C) Maximum propulsion efficiency, δmax. (D) Three individual aggregates labeled in (B) and (C): ε ≈ 0.24 (cluster #1), δmax = 0.214 (cluster #2), and δmax = 0.177 (cluster #3). Yoni Mirzae et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaas8713 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works