EU biodiversity strategy to Target 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASSESSMENT ISSUES An EU Perspective Ladislav Miko Director, Protecting the Natural Environment, DG Environment, European Commission.
Advertisements

BD SKILLS – Skills for Local Biodiversity How to plan for Nature? Testing workshop Camp Reinsehlen, 25 – 27 January 2012.
Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 Claudia Olazábal Deputy Head of Unit Biodiversity Unit DG Environment European.
Building the knowledge base for the implementation/ monitoring of biodiversity strategies Breakout group discussion 1.
A training package for local biodiversity planning Getting to grips with policy and decision-making.
1 SURF to Biodiversity 2020 Maria Tiefenbach Environment Agency Austria.
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
European Commission Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in the EU today – Business & Biodiversity Alexandra Vakrou, EC, DG Environment IEF European Roundtable.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
NRC BIODIVERSITY Rationale for the meeting NRC Biodiversity – 5-7 November 2012 EEA - COPENHAGEN Ivone Pereira Martins – EEA, - Head of Group, Biodiversity.
Economics in support of biodiversity conservation policy The EC experience Expert Workshop on Biodiversity and Economics, EEA 5 October 2006 Alexandra.
State of Nature 2015 Overview of results & available products from articles 12 & 17 reports ( ) Carlos Romão | Eionet – NRC Biodiversity
Agenda item 4.B Green Infrastructure CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 8 th meeting – 22/06/10.
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011
EEA Biodiversity, Agriculture and Forest work in 2010 and beyond EEA/NRC Agriculture Meeting 2010 Ivone Pereira Martins, HoG – Biodiversity, Agriculture.
1 Nature conservation policy Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water legislation June 2010 Stefan Leiner Acting Head.
1 The EU Platform – a commitment or an opportunity? European Commission DG Environment Unit B2 Biodiversity
Break-out group discussion
REPORTING PURSUANT TO ART. 17 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implications for South Africa
Towards a common implementation framework
Expert Group on the Birds and Habitats Directives (NADEG)
Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU
Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Council conclusions 21 June 2011: EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
EU Biodiversity Strategy in context
of EU-level green and blue infrastructure
The IUCN Green List Sustainability Standard
ARTICLE 17 REPORTING: SUMMARY OF MAIN RESULTS
Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality
Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.
Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 22/03/2012
8th Meeting Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives
on the new biogeographic process
THE POINTS OF GOAL 15 : Sustainably manage forests;
Conservation objectives: The favourable conservation status
What is the place for biodiversity in the Catalan 2030 Agenda?
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
EU biodiversity policy: Towards a post-2010 strategy
Measuring progress towards Target 1
Carlos Romão | Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives
Preparatory Workshop of the Pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Seminar
Assessment of Conservation Status for Large Carnivores
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
Dealing with change in Article 17 reporting
Links with Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Multi-annual Financial Framework and Biodiversity Financing
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
Expert group on management of Natura 2000
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Wind energy & EU legislation for Nature conservation
Agenda item 3.3 (d) Common monitoring framework
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
The New Biogeographic Process General info – December 2011
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
The State of Nature in the EU
New Biogeographic process
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
COMMISSION NOTE ON THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACs) Habitats Committee Brussels, 26 April 2012.
Environmental aspects
Measuring progress under Target 1 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy
Presentation transcript:

EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 - Target 1 Habitats Committee, 26.9.2011

Brussels, 3.5.2011 COM(2011) 244 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020

In a few words... 2050 vision Biodiversity & ecosystem services protected, valued and appropriately restored 2020 headline target Halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020

The six targets FULLY IMPLEMENT THE BIRDS AND HABITATS DIRECTIVES MAINTAIN AND RESTORE ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR SERVICES INCREASE THE CONTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY TO MAINTAINING AND ENHANCING BIODIVERSITY ENSURE THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF FISHERIES RESOURCES COMBAT INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES HELP AVERT GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY LOSS

TARGET 1: FULLY IMPLEMENT THE BIRDS AND HABITATS DIRECTIVES To halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status so that, by 2020, compared to current assessments: 100% more habitat assessments and 50% more species assessments under the Habitats Directive show a favourable or improved conservation status; and 50% more species assessments under the Birds Directive show a secure or improved status.

So what does target 1 really mean? For habitats: 34% of conservation status assessments (EU-biogeographical level) are favourable or show evidence of improvement by 2020 (now 17% favourable) For species: 26% of conservation status assessments (EU-biogeographical level) are favourable or show evidence of improvement by 2020 (now 17% favourable) Based on feasibility calculations For Birds: 80% of bird species assessments are either secure or improving by 2020 (now 52% secure)

The Habitats Directive target based on the first conservation status assessment (Art.17 reporting) on biogeographic level conducted between 2007 (national reports) & 2009 (EU composite report). it revealed that only 17% of the biogeographic assessments for both habitats and species showed favourable conservation status. Next assessments (6-year cycle): 2013-15 2019-21

The Birds Directive target is based on the analysis of conservation status prepared by Birdlife International in 2004. Their analysis of each species refers to the extinction risk and the determination of species of European conservation concern (SPECs). The 2004 assessment concluded that 52% of species are secure Next assessment: 2014

Theoretical example for species 4% improved from red to amber 7% improved from amber to green 28% favourable or improving – target reached SPECIES Favourable status Inadequate status Bad status Unknown* 2007 17% 30% 22% 31% 2020 24% 27% 18% (31%)

Feasibility calculation Calculations carried our by EEA and ETC/BD Assumption: some parameters will potentially will improve quicker than others if adequate conservation management are taken: Species: habitat area, population and future prospects Habitats: future prospects, structure & functions Range unlikely to change significantly over 10 years. Cases where the overall assessment could be improved by only changing one or two parameter to the better were considered more likely than those which would need several parameters to change. The analysis used 2240 assessments for species and 701 assessments for habitats at biogeographical level.

Follow up of target and further work, e. g Follow up of target and further work, e.g. breakdown of target into biogeographical regions potentially follwed up by the Expert Group on Reporting We can do it!