Neural Sex Modifies the Function of a C. elegans Sensory Circuit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Advertisements

Biological components of sex differences in color preference
The Anaphase-Promoting Complex Regulates the Abundance of GLR-1 Glutamate Receptors in the Ventral Nerve Cord of C. elegans  Peter Juo, Joshua M. Kaplan 
Sensory Regulation of C. elegans Male Mate-Searching Behavior
Egg-Laying Demand Induces Aversion of UV Light in Drosophila Females
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (May 2007)
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
C. elegans Locomotory Rate Is Modulated by the Environment through a Dopaminergic Pathway and by Experience through a Serotonergic Pathway  Elizabeth.
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann, Paolo Bazzicalupo 
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Regulation of Body Size and Behavioral State of C
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Antarctic sea ice losses drive gains in benthic carbon drawdown
Björn Brembs, Wolfgang Plendl  Current Biology 
The Sensory Circuitry for Sexual Attraction in C. elegans Males
Sexually Dimorphic Differentiation of a C
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Sensory Regulation of C. elegans Male Mate-Searching Behavior
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages e3 (May 2018)
Takashi Murayama, Jun Takayama, Mayuki Fujiwara, Ichiro N. Maruyama 
Evolution of a Behavioral Shift Mediated by Superficial Neuromasts Helps Cavefish Find Food in Darkness  Masato Yoshizawa, Špela Gorički, Daphne Soares,
Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages (November 2007)
Egg-Laying Demand Induces Aversion of UV Light in Drosophila Females
Neural Circuits: Reduced Inhibition in Fragile X Syndrome
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
An AP2 Transcription Factor Is Required for a Sleep-Active Neuron to Induce Sleep-like Quiescence in C. elegans  Michal Turek, Ines Lewandrowski, Henrik.
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Ryota Kanai, Tom Feilden, Colin Firth, Geraint Rees  Current Biology 
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Stable inheritance of an acquired behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
A Taste Receptor Required for the Caffeine Response In Vivo
An AP2 Transcription Factor Is Required for a Sleep-Active Neuron to Induce Sleep-like Quiescence in C. elegans  Michal Turek, Ines Lewandrowski, Henrik.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex  Kasper Vinken, Rufin Vogels  Current Biology 
A Wolbachia-Sensitive Communication between Male and Female Pupae Controls Gamete Compatibility in Drosophila  Stéphanie M. Pontier, François Schweisguth 
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
A Single Set of Interneurons Drives Opposite Behaviors in C. elegans
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Samuel James Walker, Verónica María Corrales-Carvajal, Carlos Ribeiro 
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Regulation of the Longevity Response to Temperature by Thermosensory Neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans  Seung-Jae Lee, Cynthia Kenyon  Current Biology 
Raghav Rajan, Allison J. Doupe  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Regulation of Response Properties and Operating Range of the AFD Thermosensory Neurons by cGMP Signaling  Sara M. Wasserman, Matthew Beverly, Harold W.
Andrea Gloria-Soria, Ricardo B.R. Azevedo  Current Biology 
Active Inbreeding in a Cichlid Fish and Its Adaptive Significance
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
Flies Cope with Uncontrollable Stress by Learned Helplessness
Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands
Contextual Taste Cues Modulate Olfactory Learning in C
Toll-like Receptor Signaling Promotes Development and Function of Sensory Neurons Required for a C. elegans Pathogen-Avoidance Behavior  Julia P. Brandt,
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
A Temporal Channel for Information in Sparse Sensory Coding
Presentation transcript:

Neural Sex Modifies the Function of a C. elegans Sensory Circuit KyungHwa Lee, Douglas S. Portman  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages 1858-1863 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.015 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Hermaphrodites and Males Have Different Olfactory Responses Young adult hermaphrodites (red) and males (blue) were assayed in sex-segregated populations in single-odorant olfaction assays [15]. Three dilutions of the odorants da and py (sensed in hermaphrodites by AWA) and bz and bu (sensed in hermaphrodites by AWC) were tested. Each data point represents the weighted mean of 4 to 12 assays each containing ∼50 animals. Error bars show the weighted SEM. The statistical significance of sex differences in CI was determined with a Student's t test. In all figures, statistical significance is indicated with asterisks as follows: “∗∗∗” indicates p < 0.001, “∗∗” indicates p < 0.01, and “∗” indicates p < 0.05. Current Biology 2007 17, 1858-1863DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Each Sex Has a Specific Set of Olfactory Preferences (A) The olfactory-preference assay is a modification of the single-odorant assay in which the control spot (“A”) is replaced with a second attractive odorant. A sex-segregated population of worms is placed 1 cm below the center of the plate. After 45 min, the number of animals within 2 cm of each spot is counted and used to calculate the olfactory preference index (OPI). This assay minimizes any potential confounding effects of sex differences in activity (e.g., movement rate or mating drive) or sensitivity to olfactory attractants because it measures the relative difference in attraction to two different odorants. (B) The OPI of adult hermaphrodites (open red circles) and males (closed blue circles) is shown for each of the four odorant pairs indicated at the left. Each point represents the weighted mean of at least ten olfactory-preference assays, each containing ∼50 animals. Error bars indicate weighted SEM. The significance of sex differences in OPI for each odorant pair was determined with a Student's t test. Current Biology 2007 17, 1858-1863DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sex Differences in Olfactory Preference Do Not Require the Gonad Mock-ablated, germline- and gonad- (Z1–Z4) ablated, and germline- (Z2, Z3) ablated animals were tested individually for da-py olfactory preference behavior as young adults. Behavioral responses were determined with a modified olfactory-preference assay as described in the Experimental Procedures. Each data point represents the odorant-preference behavior of single animal (open red circle, hermaphrodite; closed blue circle, male). Vertical bars indicate the median response of each group of animals. Logistic regression was used for the determination of the statistical significance of the sex difference in behavior in each of the three groups. Current Biology 2007 17, 1858-1863DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sex Differences in Olfactory Preference Are Determined by the Sexual Identity of the Nervous System (A) tra-1(e1099) XX pseudomales were assayed for py-bz and da-py olfactory preference. In both cases, the loss of tra-1 function led to the complete masculinization of the behavior of XX animals. (B) Animals carrying three different fem-3(+) overexpression transgenes were assayed in the da-py olfactory-preference assay. Two different transgenic lines were tested for each construct. Prab-3::fem-3(+) (oxEx862 and oxEx863) expresses fem-3(+) throughout the nervous system, Posm-5::fem-3(+) (fsEx160 and fsEx161) expresses fem-3(+) in all sensory neurons [23, 24], and Pglr-1::fem-3(+) (fsEx158 and fsEx159) expresses fem-3(+) in a large set of interneurons and motor neurons [25]. The wild-type averages are derived only from those assays that were carried out in parallel with assays on transgenic strains. Each point represents the weighted mean and standard error of at least six assays with an average of 56 animals per assay (wild-type), 25 animals per assay [Prab-3::fem-3(+) and Posm-5::fem-3(+)], or 38 animals per assay [Pglr-1::fem-3(+)]. The statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests. Error bars indicate the weighted SEM. Current Biology 2007 17, 1858-1863DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions