Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Crystal Structure of the 100 kDa Arsenite Oxidase from Alcaligenes faecalis in Two Crystal Forms at 1.64 Å and 2.03 Å  Paul J. Ellis, Thomas Conrads,
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Xiao Tao, Zhiru Yang, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
A Model for Arrestin’s Regulation: The 2
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (April 1997)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 110, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison with STAT6CF-N4 complex structure. Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 807-816 (December 1998) Three-Dimensional Structure of the Complex between a T Cell Receptor β Chain and the Superantigen Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B  Hongmin Li, Andrea Llera, Daisuke Tsuchiya, Lukas Leder, Xavier Ysern, Patrick M Schlievert, Klaus Karjalainen, Roy A Mariuzza  Immunity  Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 807-816 (December 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9

Figure 1 TCR β-SEB Interface (A) Electron density from the final 2.4 Å σA-weighted 2 Fo-Fc map of the wild-type TCR β-SEB complex, contoured at 1σ, in the region of the interface. (B) Electron density from the final 2.6 Å simulated annealing map of the mutant TCR β-SEB V26Y complex, contoured at 1σ, showing the Val26→Tyr substitution in SEB; the view is the same as in (A). SEB residues are indicated with an asterisk. Bound water molecules are drawn as pink spheres. Carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are colored yellow, blue, and red, respectively. All figures were generated by Molscript (Kraulis 1991) and Raster 3D (Bacon and Anderson 1988; Merritt and Bacon 1997) if not specified. (C) Interactions in the wild-type β-SEB interface. Vβ atoms are colored according to atom type as in (A); SEB is colored green. Pink spheres represent interface water molecules. (D) Interactions in the mutant β-SEB V26Y interface. SEB V26Y is colored blue. Hydrogen bonds are dotted brown lines. SAG residues are indicated with asterisks. Immunity 1998 9, 807-816DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9)

Figure 2 TCR β-SEB Complex (A) Ribbons diagram of the VβCβ-SEB complex. Colors are as follows: Vβ (yellow), CDR1 (pink), CDR2 (red), CDR3 (purple), HV4 (green), Cβ (orange), SEB large domain (gray), and SEB small domain (blue). Residues of Vβ and SEB involved in interactions in the TCR-SAG interface are red. Residues of SEB in contact with MHC in the structure of the SEB-HLA-DR1 complex (Jardetzky et al. 1994) are yellow. The SEB disulfide loop (light gray) was modeled according to the uncomplexed SEB crystal structure. (B) Superposition of the two VβCβ-SEB complex molecules (β-SEB1 and β-SEB2) in the asymmetric unit. The α-carbon diagram of β-SEB1 is red and that of β-SEB2 is green. The complexes were overlaid by superposing their Vβ domains. The view is the same as in (A). Figure was drawn using TURBO-FRODO (Roussell and Cambillau, 1989). Immunity 1998 9, 807-816DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9)

Figure 3 Conformational Differences between Complexed and Uncomplexed Vβ Chain and SEB (A) In the 14.3.d TCR β-SEB structure, uncomplexed Vβ (green) was superposed onto complexed Vβ (red), and uncomplexed SEB (yellow) was superposed onto complexed SEB (blue). Only α-carbon atoms are shown. (B) Closeup of the β-SEB interface. Bound and unbound Vβ and SEB are colored as in (A); Vβ and SEB residues are labeled in black and blue, respectively. Immunity 1998 9, 807-816DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9)

Figure 4 Comparison of Vβ Structures in the Region of the SEB-Binding Site (A) Mouse Vβ8.2 (yellow) (Bentley et al. 1995) superposed onto human Vβ12.3 (blue) (Garboczi et al. 1996). The CDR loops are numbered 1, 2, and 3; HV4 is labeled 4. (B) Mouse Vβ8.2 (yellow) superposed onto mouse Vβ2.3 (red) (Housset et al. 1997). (C) Mouse Vβ8.2 (yellow) superposed onto mouse Vβ5.2 (green) (Wang et al. 1998). The SEB-binding site of mouse Vβ8.2 is circled in each panel. Immunity 1998 9, 807-816DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9)

Figure 5 Comparison of TCR-SAG-Peptide/MHC and TCR-Peptide/MHC Complexes (A) Model of the TCR-SEB-peptide/MHC class II complex constructed by least-squares superposition of (1) the 14.3.d VβCβ-SEB complex, (2) the SEB-peptide/HLA-DR1 complex (Jardetzky et al. 1994), and (3) the 2C TCR αβ heterodimer (Garcia et al. 1996). (B) Structure of the 2C TCR-peptide/MHC class I complex (Garcia et al. 1998). The complex is oriented such that the MHC molecule is approximately aligned with that in (A). (C) Another view of the 2C TCR-peptide/MHC class I complex. The complex is oriented such that the TCRs in (A) and (C) are aligned. Immunity 1998 9, 807-816DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80646-9)