WORK ENVIRONMENT, SLEEP QUALITY, CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING AND EMOTIONAL LABOR OF NURSES MEDIATED BY SELF-EFFICACY John Patrick Flores Dina D. Galang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mental Toughness Lesson Six: Mental Toughness Aim:
Advertisements

Hospital Discharge The Carers Journey Developed On Behalf Of Action For Carers (Surrey) And Surrey County Council.
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Self-Transcendence and Work Engagement in Acute Care Staff Registered Nurses Beth Palmer DNP, RN, ANP-BC, CNS, CCRN November 13, 2008.
Work motivation among healthcare professionals in the Saudi hospitals Presented by Nouf Sahal Al-Harbi Supervised by: Dr. Saad Al-Ghanim 2008.
Exploring the Utility of a Single-item Measure of the Readiness Ruler in Brief Interventions: Can We Determine Stage of Change? Introduction Motivational.
Comparing Job Demands, Coping Resources and Well-being Across Different Health Care Providers Working Together Jane B Lemaire MD, Jean E Wallace PhD, Janet.
Avoiding and Coping with Burnout. 1 Purpose  Learn about burnout  Understand how to avoid and cope with burnout  Create a personal action plan to cope.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Chapter 7 Correlational Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Factors that Associated with Stress in Nursing Faculty in Thailand
Nurses’ Reactions to SARS: A Cross National Comparison between China and Canada Esther Greenglass*, Sue Coffey*, Kan Shi#, Lisa Fiksenbaum* & XueFeng Chen#
Organizational Culture and Values
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Essential Question How do I achieve optimal health and wellness ?
Developing a Tool to Measure Health Worker Motivation in District Hospitals in Kenya Patrick Mbindyo, Duane Blaauw, Lucy Gilson, Mike English.
Critical Appraisal (CA) I Prepared by Dr. Hoda Abd El Azim.
This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry.
iPPQ Team Report for Practitioners
Healthcare Organization Employee Experience Michael Mabanglo, PhD, LCSW February 16, 2016.
Transition Skills Self-belief. Do you have trouble believing you can perform well in situations you find difficult, for example writing an academic essay.
Background There continues to be a shortage of RNs. A possible short fall of up to 36% is predicted by 2020 (USDHHS, 2006). Hospital nurse staffing is.
Kick Off How does the way you express emotions reflect your mental health?
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 47 Critiquing Assessments.
Mental & Emotional health
Maintaining your health and well-being
Logic of Hypothesis Testing
BROOKHAVEN HOSPITAL’S
Multiple Regression: II
Items in red require your input
Job design & job satisfaction
ERFCON th International Conference of the Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Zagreb 17 – 19 May 2017, Zagreb SOCIAL COMPETENCE.
Introduction Method Results Conclusions
Dr.Khuda Bakhsh Assistant Professor GC University, Faisalabad
A RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PATIENT CENTEREDNESS
What is performance management?
Leadership.
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Motivation and Engagement in Learning
School Climate Data Workshop
Summary.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy, and Social Interaction Skills of the Office Administration Students Marvelous F. Opina Jenny Ann A. Sabanal Berdandino.
Informed Consent to Treatment
Items in red require your input
The relationship between job-related stressors and stress responses of nurses working in intermediate nursing homes in Japan Y.Momose1, A.Fujino1, N.Amaki1,
Items in red require your input
Peer Program Evaluation
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Safer Culture, Better Care
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior
Management Control System, Human Resource Management Practices, and Organizational Performance of Selected Higher Education Institutions in the Southern.
Achieving Mental and Emotional Health
Learner motivation and individual differences in language learning Dr Louise Courtney Professor Suzanne Graham University of Reading Siena July 2017.
Polishing Up What is Inside
Making the Most of Your Life
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Mental/Emotional Health
Happiness Index Analysis
Achieving Mental and Emotional Health
Employee Engagement Defined
Job design & job satisfaction
Working with a disability
Employee Engagement Align ~ Link ~ Connect
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
International Academic Multidisciplinary Research Conference in Rome
Presentation transcript:

WORK ENVIRONMENT, SLEEP QUALITY, CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING AND EMOTIONAL LABOR OF NURSES MEDIATED BY SELF-EFFICACY John Patrick Flores Dina D. Galang Jezamine De Leon Susy A. Jael Myrtle C. Orbon

Nurses comprise the largest groups of professionals within the healthcare system. They care for patients continuously, 24 hours a day, to help patients do what they are not able to do for themselves The dynamic and uncertain nature of the health care environment requires nurses to be competent and confident decision-makers in order to respond to the clients’ needs (Standing, 2014).

All throughout the shifts, nurses gather, filter, interpret and transfer data into meaningful information required to diagnose, treat, and make decisions about the care of individual patients (McCauley, 2005).

On the discharge of their duties and responsibilities, they are sometimes nagged with numerous complaints from their colleagues, doctors, patients, patients' significant others, superiors, and work environment resulting to engagement in emotional labor ( Brown, 2011; Humprey, 2008).

As they perform their responsibilities they too are expected to be compassionate and empathic on top of the challenges from their colleagues, superior and work environment in general.

Though there is mounting evidence that work environment, sleep quality, and self-efficacy influence confidence in decision-making and emotional labor, there is a dearth of study on the relationship of work environment, sleep quality, confidence in decision-making and emotional labor as mediated by self-efficacy, thus this study.

Research Paradigm Confidence in Decision-Making Sleep Quality Work Environment Interpersonal Relationship Organizational Support Working Condition Confidence in Decision-Making SELF-EFFICACY Emotional Labor Surface Acting Deep Acting Sleep Quality Research Paradigm

This descriptive correlational study studied 250 staff nurses selected through purposive sampling from eight private hospitals in the province of Laguna. Registered nurses ages 22-35 who had worked in the general wards for six months and above; irrespective of their work status, gender, shift, and marital status were included in the study.

OVERALL WORK ENVIRONMENT No. Item M SD SR VI 1 Interpersonal Relationship 3.83 0.52 Often Good 2 Organizational Support 4.33 0.61 3 Working Conditions 3.68 0.54 OVERALL MEAN 3.94 0.39 Note: Very Good= 4.50-5.00; Good=3.50-4.49; Average=2.50-3.49; Poor=1.50-2.49; Very Poor=1.00-1.49

The grand mean of 3.94 (SD=0.39), indicates that the grand scale response is often and verbally interpreted as good. This result implies that the respondents have a positive work environment wherein they reap social, health, and personal benefits from a positive atmosphere at their place of employment.

SLEEP QUALITY OF THE RESPONDENTS No. Item Mean SD SR VI 1 Upon waking up I feel: Alert 2.03 0.54 Slightly Agree Fair 2 Refreshed 2.02 0.58 3 Energized 2.04 0.55 4 Contented with my night’s sleep 1.81 0.62 5 Relaxed 2.00 0.60 OVERALL MEAN 1.98 0.47 Note: Good=2.50-3.00; Fair= 1.50-2.49; Poor=1.00-1.49

Number of sleeping hours of nurses No. of hours of sleep Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 4 16 6.4 5 34 13.6 20.0 6 106 42.4 62.4 7 47 18.8 81.2 8 39 15.6 96.8 9 2 0.8 97.6 10 2.4 100 Total 250 Grand Mean: 6.35 SD: 1.24 To further support the sleep quality of nurses

The grand mean of the result is 1. 98 (SD=0 The grand mean of the result is 1.98 (SD=0.47) which has a grand scale response of slightly agree and verbally interpreted as fair. The result implies that the respondents’ quality of sleep was fair which means that they are not having enough amount of sleep.

LEVEL OF SELF-EFFICACY No. Item M SD SR VI 1 I believe that I can finish a task completely 4.34 0.73 Often High 2 I am willing to accept the emotional challenges in my work environment. 3 I can easily recover from the setbacks in my work environment. 4.16 0.76 4 I see to it that I put value to my commitment in my work environment. 4.45 0.69 5 I set goals that are higher than my previous achievements. 4.40 0.72 6 I believe that everything I do in my work environment produces good outcomes. 4.42 0.67 *7 I feel that I am not a competent staff nurse in the work environment 3.64 1.28 Sometimes Average *8 I cannot multitask. 3.96 1.17 OVERALL MEAN 4.21 0.57 Note: Very High= 4.50-5.00; High=3.50-4.49; Average=2.50-3.49; Low=1.50-2.49; Very Low=1.00-1.49 *RECODED

LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING No. Item M SD SR VI 1 I identify factors which are important when deciding what intervention to do. 4.23 0.74 Often High 2 I know how to: motivate myself to continue getting information 4.28 0.72 b. think alternatives until I come up with a good choice 0.77 3 I shut out distractions so I can concentrate on deciding on one goal. 4.02 0.85 4 I recognize my own anxiety and calm myself before deciding to avoid making poor choices. 4.13 0.75 5 I anticipate important decisions so that I can have needed information and be prepared when the time comes for deciding. 4.19 6 I know who can and cannot give information or counsel that is helpful. 4.07 0.82 7 I estimate the amount of each satisfaction of my alternate choices. 3.98 0.79 8 I estimate the amount of time each of my options will require. 9 I find out the important facts about an action before making a decision. 4.17 0.78 10 I estimate whether I have the ability /energy to accomplish that certain choice. 4.15

LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING (continued) No. Item M SD SR VI 11 I diagnose current problems by looking at past decisions that did not work so that I can improve my decision-making. 4.17 0.78 Often High OVERALL MEAN 4.13 0.62 Note: Very High= 4.50-5.00; High=3.50-4.49; Average=2.50-3.49; Low=1.50-2.49; Very Low=1.00-1.49

The grand mean score of the confidence in decision-making of nurses is 4.13 (SD=0.62). Its grand scale response is often and verbally interpreted as high. It implies that nurses in Laguna have a high level of confidence in terms of decision-making.

EMOTIONAL LABOR No. Item M SD SR VI 1 Surface Acting 2.79 0.80 Sometimes Average 2 Deep Acting 3.17 0.86 OVERALL MEAN 2.98 0.69 Note: Very High= 4.50-5.00; High=3.50-4.49; Average=2.50-3.49; Low=1.50-2.49; Very Low=1.00-1.49

Based on the grand mean of 2. 98 (SD=0 Based on the grand mean of 2.98 (SD=0.69), the summary results indicate that the grand scale response is sometimes which is interpreted as average. This means that nurses do not usually utilize emotional labor since it requires displaying higher levels of compassion which can cause emotional exhaustion.

RELATIONSHIP OD WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SLEEP QUALITY TO SELF-EFFICACY Interpersonal relationship 0.355** .000 S Org. Support 0.281** Working Condition 0.259** Overall Work Environment 0.419** Sleep Quality 0.102 .109 NS The overall work environment of the respondents shows a significant relationship with self-efficacy (r=0.419 p=0.000). The result implies that the respondents’ work environment is very favourable which results to nurses highly equipped with self-efficacy. On the other hand, sleep quality was found to have no significant relationship with self-efficacy (p=0.102 r=0.109). The result implies that even though the nurse was not able to have satisfaction in their sleep due to sleep deprivation, their self-efficacy is not affected. Legend: * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

Confidence in Decision- Making RELATIONSHIP OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SLEEP QUALITY TO CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING Confidence in Decision- Making r p VI Interpersonal relationship 0.285** .000 S Org. Support 0.262** Working Condition 0.221** Overall Work Environment 0.361** Sleep Quality 0.092 .149 NS overall work environment is positively significant to the confidence in decision-making of nurses (r= 0.361 p= 0.000). In general, the different indicators of work environment contribute 13% to the variance of confidence in decision-making. It implies that the influence of work environment to confidence in decision-making is weak to strong. Also, it implies that work environment affects a nurse’s confidence in decision-making through provision of support, harmonious relationship with colleagues and conduciveness in the work setting. sleep quality and confidence in decision-making has a coefficient of 0.092 (p=0.149) which was found to be not significant. This implies that the nurse’s sleep quality does not influence their confidence in decision-making. Thus, irrespective of their sleep quality, their confidence in decision-making is not affected. Legend: * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

RELATIONSHIP OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SLEEP QUALITY TO EMOTIONAL LABOR Surface Acting Deep Acting Overall Emotional Labor r p VI Interpersonal relationship -0.078 0.218 NS 0.017 0.791 -0.034 0.588 Org. Support -.129* 0.042 S 0.587 -0.096 0.132 Working Condition 0.016 0.805 0.063 0.322 0.048 0.449 Overall Work Environment -0.094 0.772 0.018 -0.042 0.505 Sleep Quality 0.014 0.829 0.454 0.037 0.555 The overall work environment and emotional labor was also not significant with each other (r=-0.042 p=0.505). The implication indicates that the totality of a nurse’s work environment does not affect the nurse’s emotion regulation in dealing with the patients. , the correlation of sleep quality to emotional labor was found to be not significant (r=0.014 p= 0.829) as also shown in Table 18. The result implies that no matter what the sleep quality of the nurse is, their regulation of emotions is apparently not affected. Legend: * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

RELATIONSHIP OF SELF-EFFICACY TO CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING AND EMOTIONAL LABOR Surface Acting Deep Acting Overall Emotional Labor r p VI P Self-efficacy 0.650** .000 S -0.055 0.385 NS 0.145* 0.022 0.058 0.360 the findings indicate that self-efficacy was significantly related to confidence in decision-making (r=0.650** p= 0.000) at 0.01 level (2-tailed). This implies that those who are competent tend to be confident in making decisions as they perform this tasks and responsibilities. emotional labor in terms of deep acting, when taking singly is significantly related to self-efficacy (r= 0.145 p= 0.022). This shows that self-efficacy is positively related to emotional labor in terms of deep acting. This implies that the higher is the nurse’s self-efficacy, the higher is deep acting manifestation. the self-efficacy and overall emotional labor of the nurses are not significantly related with each other (r=0.058 p=0.360). This implies that the self-efficacy of nurses do not influence the regulation of emotion of the respondents. Legend: * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

MEDIATION EFFECT OF SELF-EFFICACY ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND SLEEP QUALITY TO CONFIDENCE IN DECISION-MAKING AND EMOTIONAL LABOR

Based on AMOS, the final model generated shows that work environment has both direct and indirect relationship with confidence in decision-making since self-efficacy mediates their relationship. Thus, partial mediation occurs

CONCLUSION The respondents had a good work environment and they enjoy a harmonious relationship with their colleagues, adequate support from their organizational managers, and good working conditions. The better the work environment, the higher the self-efficacy and the confidence of nurses in decision-making. Self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between work environment and confidence in decision-making. On the other hand, self-efficacy fully mediates the relationship between work environment and deep acting.

RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions of this study, the researchers propose the need to conduct the same study while including other variables such as age, years of experience, and shift work. It is also recommended to include nurses from special units such as emergency room, operating room, critical care services, dialysis and outpatient as respondents for the study.  

The researchers also recommend considering other variables that may influence the nurses’ confidence in decision-making.