The two-step Fagan's nomogram.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Likelihood ratios Why these are the most thrilling statistics in Emergency Medicine.
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Is it True? Evaluating Research about Diagnostic Tests
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
Processing physical evidence discovering, recognizing and examining it; collecting, recording and identifying it; packaging, conveying and storing it;
NHS Atlas of Variation in Diagnostic Services Prof Jo Martin NCD Pathology.
Diagnosing – Critical Activity HINF Medical Methodologies Session 7.
Diagnostics in EM; test thresholds and likelihood ratios Published courtesy of the CEM FOAMed Network
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Diagnostic Cases. Goals & Objectives Highlight Bayesian and Boolean processes used in classic diagnosis Demonstrate use/misuse of tests for screening.
Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.
+ Clinical Decision on a Diagnostic Test Inna Mangalindan. Block N. Class September 15, 2008.
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
HL2 Math - Santowski Lesson 93 – Bayes’ Theorem. Bayes’ Theorem  Main theorem: Suppose we know We would like to use this information to find if possible.
Biostatistics Board Review Parul Chaudhri, DO Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellow, UPMC St Margaret March 5, 2016.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Date of download: 7/1/2016 From: A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4): doi: /
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
Diagnostic Test Studies
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Evidence-Based Medicine
Publishing Nutrition Research: Validity, Reliability, and Diagnostic Test Assessment in Nutrition-Related Research  Philip M. Gleason, PhD, Jeffrey Harris,
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
How do we judge efficacy of a screening test?
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
سرطان الثدي Breast Cancer
Percentage of anaerobic threshold–metabolic equivalent (MET) relationship during the 10 m shuttle walking test with cones for post-myocardial  infarction.
The diagnostic value of urinary incontinence in the differential diagnosis of seizures  Francesco Brigo, Raffaele Nardone, Harald Ausserer, Monica Storti,
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Does This Woman Have an Acute Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection?
بعض النقاط التي تؤخذ في الحسبان عند تقييم الاستثمارات الزراعية
Accuracy of Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Detection of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 
COUNTERPOINT: Should BAL Be Routinely Performed in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis? No  Joshua J. Mooney, MD, Harold R. Collard,
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Publishing Nutrition Research: Validity, Reliability, and Diagnostic Test Assessment in Nutrition-Related Research  Philip M. Gleason, PhD, Jeffrey Harris,
DSM-IV delirium prevalence, including the estimated delirium prevalence in the 31 patients that did not undergo delirium assessment following initial screening.
The Fagan's nomogram. The Fagan's nomogram. For example: the MRI screening test for breast cancer in high-risk female patients has an estimated diagnostic.
Funnel plot of the 17 trials comparing haloperidol and placebo in schizophrenia (outcome: response rate). Funnel plot of the 17 trials comparing haloperidol.
TUCAN (CARD8) Genetic Variants and Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Meta-analytical probability modifying plot, illustrating the relationship between pretest probability of psychosis onset 38 months and post-test probability.
J. A. Castilla, S. Zamora, M. C. Gonzalvo, J. D. Luna del Castillo, J
Accuracy of Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Detection of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 
Accuracy of sputum colour in predicting NB
Computation of Post Test Probability
Two way sensitivity analyses of the sensitivity and specificity of HSV-2 type specific ELISA. Each line represents a different estimate of ELISA specificity.
 A nomogram of Bayes for applying positive and negative likelihood ratios calculated for selected ranges of values of procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive.
Schematic representation of dose-response relations for toxic chemicals: — – — – candidates for OESs; ······ candidates for MELs. Response may be increasing.
Meta-analysis of risk ratios for percentage of patients who developed catheter-associated urinary tract infection, for intervention versus control groups,
Meta-analysis of risk ratios for percentage of patients who developed catheter-associated urinary tract infection, for intervention versus control groups,
Family studies of bipolar disorder.
Relative risk of suffering clinically measurable levels of general anxiety and depression following a false-positive mammogram compared to a normal mammogram,
Forest plot of various sensitivity analyses of the risk for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility (TFI) between.
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Size of the four key populations at risk: (1) male clients of female sex workers (MCFSW), (2) men who have sex with men (MSM), (3) female sex worker (FSW)
Predicting Axillary Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Breast MRI and US in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer An imaging-based predictive model.
Causation is defined by a different risk in the entire population under two potential exposure values; association is defined by a different risk in the.
Presentation transcript:

The two-step Fagan's nomogram. The two-step Fagan's nomogram. For example: the MRI screening test for breast cancer in high-risk female patients has an estimated diagnostic sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 96%.11 A positive result from the MRI provides a likelihood ratio (LR+) of approximately 19 (red line, I). Given that the patient came from a high-risk population with an estimated prevalence of 2% and tested positive, the post-test probability for this patient to truly have cancer would be approximately 28% (red line, II). Alternatively, a negative test result would produce a likelihood ratio (LR−) of approximately 0.25 (blue line, I) and the post-test probability for this patient to truly have cancer would be approximately 0.6% (blue line, II). Charles G B Caraguel, and Raphaël Vanderstichel Evid Based Med 2013;18:125-128 ©2013 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd