Experience with the 112 MHz 4K SRF Gun for CeC PoP at RHIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Dmitry Kayran R&D: G5 test and Commissioning Plan Eduard Pozdeyev, Dmitry Kayran BNL R&D ERL Review February 17-18, 2010 R&D.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
05/20/ High-Current Polarized Source Developments Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
GaAs and CsKSb Photocathodes for DC Gun
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
Scientific Goals: V. Litvinenko’s RHIC retreat talk Commissioning Goals: I. Pinayev presentation last week Run 14 Goals: Complete assembly of 112 MHz SCRF.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) cost estimate December 2, 2014.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
MP Questions for LE eCooling. Why talk about this now? Is there additional equipment needed, not yet considered? (nor costed) Interfaces to systems that.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling Meeting Minutes – 11/5/14 1.J. Tuozzolo will schedule a visit to NSLS next week to evaluate available magnets, power supplies,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
G5 Design Review, April 24, 2009 Gun to 5cell Cavity Test: Overview Dmitry Kayran G5 test Design Review April,
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Bob Lambiase May 21, The purpose of eRHIC is to have the capability to collide heavy ions with leptons, such as electrons and polarized electrons.
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Low-Energy RHIC electron Cooling (LEReC) MPS meeting MPS Meeting April 21, 2016.
Reliability of SNS Superconducting Linac April 12, 2011 Jeff Saunders SNS/ORNL.
LEReC System 1. Project Schedule 2015 shutdown COMPETE! Move beam line equipment from IP 01:00 Install cooling section beam line 2016 shutdown Install.
New capabilities of the Coherent electron Cooling system at RHIC 1 Vladimir N. Litvinenko Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA C-AD, Brookhaven.
An Electron source for PERLE
Operations Machine Simulator.
Degradation and Recovery of Cavity Performance
Partial Warm-Ups at CLS
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
DC Injector and Space Charge Simulation Status
R&D Activity for Field Emission and Vertical EP
Operating SRF in a "dirty" machine
SNS Fundamental Power Coupler History
Experimental Overview
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
Erdong Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory
CW Operation of XFEL Modules
TTC meeting, Feb. 6-9, 2018, Milan Trouble Shorting of CW Operation of Superconducting Linac for Chinese ADS Yuan He, Yongming Li, Xinmeng Liu, Zheng Gao,
Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC High Voltage Photogun
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
KEK injector cryomodule
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Beam Dynamics in a Spilt SRF-Gun
UITF MPS system requirements
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Performance Degradation cERL Injector Cryomodule
Electron Source Configuration
Center for Injectors and Sources
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker October 12, 2018
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
Superconducting High Brightness RF Photoinjector Design
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
Why CeC is needed? High luminosity of US future electron-ion collider(EIC) is critical for success of its physics program 2018 NAS Assessment of U.S.-Based.
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Residual Gases in CEBAF Warm Beam Line Sources and Evacuation
Presentation transcript:

Experience with the 112 MHz 4K SRF Gun for CeC PoP at RHIC Kevin Smith TTC Meeting at TRIUMF February 6, 2019

Presentation Outline A Mercifully Brief Overview of CeC PoP Experiment at RHIC (BNL) A Less Brief Overview of the 112 MHz SRF Gun Structure The Main Operational Challenges and Solutions Thereto Numerous and Persistent Strong Multipacting Barriers Strong Field Emission Extremely Brief (No) Summary in the Interest of Brevity

Overview of the CeC PoP Expermient Bunching RF cavities Low energy transport beam-line with 5 solenoids Dog-leg: 3 dipoles 6 quads 13.5 MeV SRF linac Low power Beam dump 1.05 MV SRF Gun CeC modulator 4 quads Common section with RHIC CeC “kicker” High power beam dump 2 dipoles CeC FEL amplifier 3 helical wigglers The CeC PoP (Coherent electron Cooling Proof of Principle) Experiment at RHIC is a novel, bunched beam cooling experiment at RHIC. PI is V. Litvinenko. Goal: Strong hadron cooling for a high energy Electron-Ion Collider. In essence, an extremely wideband stochastic cooling system using an FEL.

Overview of the CeC PoP Expermient Bunching RF cavities Low energy transport beam-line with 5 solenoids Dog-leg: 3 dipoles 6 quads 13.5 MeV SRF linac Low power Beam dump 1.05 MV SRF Gun CeC modulator 4 quads Common section with RHIC CeC “kicker” High power beam dump 2 dipoles CeC FEL amplifier 3 helical wigglers The CeC PoP (Coherent electron Cooling Proof of Principle) Experiment at RHIC is a novel, bunched beam cooling experiment at RHIC. PI is V. Litvinenko. Goal: Strong hadron cooling for high energy Electron-Ion Collider. In essence, an extremely wideband stochastic cooling system using an FEL. Two SRF systems: 112 MHz ¼ Wave Photocathode Gun (4K), Design: 2 MV, Operation: 1.1 MV Dark Current Limit) LHe tap from a RHIC “DX” magnet with local 4K Quiet LHe source at the cryomodule 704 MHz 5-Cell Elliptical Linac Cavity (2K), Design: 20 MV, Operation: 13.5 MV (Quench Limit) Shares 112 MHz LHe tap from RHIC. Local booster pumps for 2K operation Integrated 2K Lhe heat exchanger design for noise isolation Both systems share local compressor for return of warm He gas to RHIC plant.

CeC PoP 4K and 2K LHe Systems

112 MHz ¼ Wave Photocathode Gun Before I talk about the Cavity behavior and experiences … Excellent results as a Photocathode Gun World record bunch charge for an SRF Gun 10.7 nC per bunch maximum achieved Record low normalized emittance: 0.32 mm mrad at 0.5 nC QE lifetime from one to two months Room temperature water cooled cathode (i.e. not cold) Requires automatic He blowout system in case of water flow failure

112 MHz ¼ Wave Photocathode Gun Field Probe RF coupling to Field Probe is via this coaxial structure. Qext depends on the position of the cathode stalk.

112 MHz ¼ Wave Photocathode Gun RF coupling to Field Probe is via this coaxial structure. Qext depends on the position of the cathode stalk.

112 MHz ¼ Wave Photocathode Gun FPC Structure The coaxial FPC also acts as the cavity tuner, and thus Qext and fres are coupled. BW1/2 at Qext = 1E7 is 5.6 Hz.

Multipacting was the Most Persistent Issue The cavity exhibits several hard MP levels at 2kV, 22 kV, 30 kV, and 40 kV. Others at higher voltages in FPC and Cathode Stalk structures. This is life in a system with a multiplicity of coaxial structures. These proved to be difficult to condition in general, and impossible to condition with a live (CsK2Sb) photocathode inserted. Cathode QE will be annihilated by MP conditioning – extremely sensitive to vacuum excursions. Once MP occurs, it often “hardens” the MP barrier, requiring some “rest” period prior to attempting turn on again. 10 min to overnight, depending on “integrated” MP activity. Jumping over (through) MP requires strong coupling (low Qext) and maximum RF power. But if the MP barrier holds, strong vacuum activity and “hardening” of the barrier. Operating voltage (~ 1.1 MV CW) requires med-high Qext due to RF power limitation (4kW – originally 1kW) and FPC power dissipation. Susceptible to dropping into MP at or on way up to operating voltage. Solution LLRF system employs a combination of PLL (for turn on) and GDR modes (for regulated operation). Provides a “straight forward” way to accommodate the coupling between Qext and fres. Add LLRF “trap” to detect MP and cut drive to avoid prolonged MP. Automated script to coordinate turn on through to operating point.

Example of Cavity Turn On Attempt with Strong MP Four repeated attempts to turn on result in getting stuck at 22 kV MP barrier. Attempts last only 20ms, controlled by LLRF MP trap code. Prevents significant energy deposition => vacuum activity which would kill cathode QE. Successful jump through 22 kV MP barrier. Lengthen period between attempts from ~ 20 min to ~ 40 min => 5th attempt = successful turn on. Cathode QE not impacted by turn on attempts as MP related vacuum activity is kept minimal. Failure to achieve voltage in 20 ms results in turn off of drive. 1 kV turn on (2.3 kV MP level just above) to allow PLL to lock on to cavity resonance.

Multipacting Well Studied and Understood Now Irina Petrushina (PhD student of V. Litvinenko) did a very thorough study of multipacting in the structure, with modeling and simulations that matched very well with observed barriers. Employed CST, MultP-M, ACE3P – Track3P (best approach). Also developed an equivalent circuit model integrating the resonant multipacting avalanche buildup, which provides reasonably quantitative predictions of RF power and coupling required to punch through a given MP barrier. 28 kV MP 40 kV MP

Multipacting Well Studied and Understood Now

Field Emission Limits Operating Voltage due to Dark Current Strong field emission which has required multiple (successful) rounds of pulsed conditioning and He conditioning. Why? Cavity was unquestionably contaminated prior to and/or during installation. General cavity and beamline installations were not up modern “SRF Clean” standard. Multiple insertions and retractions of a cathode structure which makes metal-metal contact “near” the SRF active surfaces likely do not help maintain clean conditions. It is not clear (to me at least) whether any active cathode material has contaminated the Nb surface(s). It is hypothesized that it has contributed to MP behavior. Result: Can’t operationally run cavity higher than about 1.1 MV CW (design is 2.0 MV). Fortunately the He return compressor can handle ~ 10 g/s, so we can push hard when attempting to condition (we’ve pegged the mass flow gauge at 10 g/s). In general, if field emission becomes excessive at 1.0MV, we can recondition and gain substantial improvement within a shift or two of effort. System has a permanent He processing system attached and available when needed. Operation at 1.0 MV – 1.1 MV has been sufficient to produce very high charge, high quality bunches. ? ?

Field Emission Change from End of Run to Start of Next Run Typical x-ray level at end of Run 17 (June 2017) was about 300 mRem/hr at 1.05 MV. Typical x-ray level at start of Run 18 (Feb 2018) was about 2000 mRem/hr at 0.9 MV. Also, lots of cathode stalk activity during the shutdown. Doesn’t help to vent beamline just downstream. Component replacement. We lose LHe when RHIC cryo shuts down. Warmup redistributes adsorbed gases.

Field Emission Processing – 40ms, 25ms, 1Hz pulsing w/ He 40 ms pulses 20 ms pulses ~ 1.2 Rem/hr at 1.7 MVpk, roughly 2-3 % duty cycle (w.r.t. peak voltage, peak x-ray) 40 ms pulse

Field Emission HPPP w/ Helium Processing Results After processing Before processing

Thanks for Your Attention!