© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 1. Functional properties of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) button mushroom powder (BMP) and composite gluten-free flour fortified.

Overall acceptability

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. Syneresis percentage of sweet potato flour (SPF), glutinous rice flour (GRF) and composite gluten-free flour fortified with BMP and inulin, stored.

Oil-soluble yellow pigment extracted from turmeric powder

Phytin phosphorus (mg/g) Oxalate content (mg/g)

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Titratable acidity (g/100g)

Anti-nutrients content Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/g)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Sensory evaluation of mayonnaise samples

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Table 2. Phytonutriments and antinutritionals factors Contents

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Commercial Characteristics of Canned White Asparagus

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]

Labor cost/Handling cost

% of inhibition of hydrolysis (INH)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Geometric properties of steel tubes used

Table 11. Return of retailers

Table 9. Functional Properties of Lentil Protein Isolate

Table 10. Return of Wholesaler

Bambara groundnut accessions

Table 2. MINERAL COMPOSITION OF OGI (GRUEL) mg/100g SAMPLES

Table 8. Marketing return of foria

Protopanaxatriol (PPT) Microwave processed drying raw ginseng (%,w/w)

Bambara groundnut accessions

Table 1. Proximate Composition of New Groundnut Accessions

Acid value (as oleic acid) Peroxide value (meq / kg)*

Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Fermentation time (hr)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square

hydrogen cyanide (HNC)

Area under cultivation (mn hectare)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Much more than it should

Oil Absorption capacity(g/g)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Total soluble substance (%)

Table 4. Removal of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Slow Sand Filters

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Solid-liquid ratio (B)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Cashew juice stored for 30 days

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Ingredients/100g dry sample

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 4. Organoleptic properties of broccoli and cauliflower as affected by different domestic processing methods Method of processing Color Taste Odor Texture Over all acceptability Fresh broccoli 8.90a±0.56 5.00b±1.05 8.60a±0.69 8.70a±0.67 8.40ab±0.84 Broccoli boiled for 6 min 7.90b±0.31 7.80a±1.13 7.70ab±1.15 8.35a±1.10 8.00b±0.94 Broccoli steamed for 12 min 8.10b±0.31 8.30a±0.67 8.40ab±0.96 8.35a±1.29 8.80a±0.42 Broccoli microwaved for 4 min 8.00b±0.81 7.35b±0.88 7.65a±1.15 7.95b±0.76 Fresh cauliflower 8.90a±0.73 5.10b±1.28 8.70a±0.94 8.80a±0.63 8.60a±0.96 Cauliflower boiled for 6 min 6.80b±1.68 7.30a±2.16 7.30b±1.70 6.65b±2.08 7.10b±0.79 Cauliflower steamed for 12 min 8.10a±0.99 8.15ab±0.94 8.30a±0.85 8.25a±0.71 Cauliflower microwaved for 4 min 8.20a±0.91 8.35ab±0.74 8.35a±0.57 8.40a±0.56 Means followed by the same letter in column are not significantly different at (p≤ 0.05). Abd Allah Mansour et al. Effect of Domestic Processing Methods on the Chemical Composition and Organoleptic Properties of Broccoli and Cauliflower. American Journal of Food and Nutrition, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 5, 125-130. doi:10.12691/ajfn-3-5-3 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.