The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Koen E. Merkus, Menno W.J. Prins, Cornelis Storm  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Effect of Microvillus Deformability on Leukocyte Adhesion Explored Using Adhesive Dynamics Simulations  Kelly E. Caputo, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical.
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal 
Velocity Fields in a Collectively Migrating Epithelium
Oscillatory Flow Accelerates Autocrine Signaling due to Nonlinear Effect of Convection on Receptor-Related Actions  Marek Nebyla, Michal Přibyl, Igor.
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Philipp J. Albert, Ulrich S. Schwarz  Biophysical Journal 
Form and Function in Cell Motility: From Fibroblasts to Keratocytes
Short Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Cytoplasmic Tails Differing in Charge Detect Arbiters of Lateral Diffusion in the Plasma Membrane  G. George.
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Nathan L. Hendel, Matthew Thomson, Wallace F. Marshall 
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Near-Critical Fluctuations and Cytoskeleton-Assisted Phase Separation Lead to Subdiffusion in Cell Membranes  Jens Ehrig, Eugene P. Petrov, Petra Schwille 
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Kinetics of Membrane Adhesion Mediated by Ligand–Receptor Interaction Studied with a Biomimetic System  Alexei Boulbitch, Zeno Guttenberg, Erich Sackmann 
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Quantitative Analysis and Modeling Probe Polarity Establishment in C
Jefferson D. Knight, Joseph J. Falke  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Crowding of Molecular Motors Determines Microtubule Depolymerization
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Jan Ribbe, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development
Nathan L. Hendel, Matthew Thomson, Wallace F. Marshall 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Strongly Accelerated Margination of Active Particles in Blood Flow
Drift and Behavior of E. coli Cells
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Firdaus Samsudin, Alister Boags, Thomas J. Piggot, Syma Khalid 
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Felix Ruhnow, David Zwicker, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Biophysical Coarse-Grained Modeling Provides Insights into Transport through the Nuclear Pore Complex  R. Moussavi-Baygi, Y. Jamali, R. Karimi, M.R.K.
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Phosphatase Specificity and Pathway Insulation in Signaling Networks
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Phagocytosis Dynamics Depends on Target Shape
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Presentation transcript:

The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment David M. Richards, Robert G. Endres  Biophysical Journal  Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 1542-1553 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Phagocytosis of a target particle. Receptors on the cell surface bind ligand molecules on the target, such as a pathogen, dead cell, or bead. As receptors bind more and more ligand molecules, the cell membrane progressively engulfs the target. Upon full engulfment, a phagosome is formed, which fuses with lysosomes, leading to digestion of the target. We denote the arc length of engulfed membrane by a, which gradually increases during engulfment. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Typical time-lapse movie and image analysis of neutrophil engulfing an IgG-coated bead. Here the bead has diameter 4.6 μm. Data from Herant et al. (14). (A) Raw images of three frames at various stages of engulfment. At t≈2 s, the bead has been released onto the cell, with a contact area of a≈2 μm. At this point engulfment has not yet started. At t≈27 s, the bead is approximately half-engulfed, with the lower lobe noticeably ahead of the upper lobe. At t≈48 s, engulfment is complete, the bead is entirely within the cell, and the phagosome is fully formed. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) The same frames as in panel A after automatic image analysis. (Blue) Cell; (red) bead; (green) outline of the pipette; (yellow) membrane attached to the bead. (C) Engulfment as a function of time. For both the upper and lower lobes, after engulfment begins at t≈10 s, there is an initial slow stage (light gray) followed by a much quicker second stage (dark gray). Engulfment is complete by t≈46 s. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Fitting to the general model. (A) The general two-stage model is split into four regions. First, before engulfment begins, the contact length is constant with a = a0. Second, after engulfment begins at t = t0, the engulfed arc length is given as a power law with power α1 and prefactor A1. Third, after t = t1, the second step begins and a is described by an independent power law with power α2 and prefactor A2. Fourth, after t = t2, the particle is completely engulfed and a = a2. (B) Comparison of the two powers, α1 and α2, showing the median and upper and lower quartiles. nα1=nα2=12 (6 beads × 2 lobes). A Mann-Whitney U-test showed that the difference between α1 and α2 is significant (p < 0.02, U = 107.5). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Types of phagocytosis and the model variables. (A) In CR3-mediated phagocytosis, the particle sinks into the cell, in a manner similar to endocytosis. (B) In contrast, in Fcγ-mediated phagocytosis, the membrane extends via pseudopod extensions outwards around the particle. Despite these differences, we believe that the movement of receptors within the membrane is similar in both cases, and can be described by the same simple model. (C) Sketch of the receptor density, ρ, which depends only on the distance from the center of the cup, r, and the time, t. Within the cup, which has arc length a, the receptor density is always fixed at ρL, whereas the density at infinity, which is the same as the initial density, is ρ0. At the edge of the cup, the receptor density is fixed at ρ+, which is calculated by considering the free energy. In the pure diffusion model, ρ+ is always less than ρ0, so that receptors always flow in toward the cup and increase the cup size. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Results from the pure diffusion, pure drift, and diffusion-and-drift models. (Left) Receptor density profile. (Right) Engulfment against time. (A) Pure diffusion model with D = 1 μm2 s−1. The receptor density, ρ, drops significantly just outside the cup so that ρ+ < ρ0 and evolves to the right as engulfment proceeds. Note that the parameters are such that ρ+ ≈ 0. The engulfment increases as the square-root of time. Receptor profile shown at t = 3 s (solid) and t = 6 s (dashed). (B) Pure drift model with v = 0.1 μm s−1. The receptor density has a completely different profile and decreases away from the cup, with ρ+ now greater than ρ0. Importantly, the engulfment now increases linearly in time. Receptor profile shown at t = 10 s (solid) and t = 20 s (dashed). (C) Diffusion and drift model with D = 1 μm2 s−1 and v = 0.1 μm s−1. Engulfment now proceeds as a mixture of the pure diffusion and pure drift cases. Initially, when the receptor density is low, a∼t as in the pure diffusion model. At later times, when the receptor gradient near the cup becomes approximately constant, a becomes more linear in time and behaves more like the pure drift result. Receptor profile shown at t = 3 s (solid) and t = 6 s (dashed). Parameters are ρ0 = 50 μm−2, ρL = 5000 μm−2, E = 15, B = 20, R = 2 μm, and L = 50 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Engulfment model with signaling. (A) Sketch of the model which, in addition to the receptor density ρ, contains a signaling molecule with density S. Receptors can only diffuse (with diffusion constant D) and drift (with speed v), whereas the signaling molecule is produced within the cup with rate βρL, degraded everywhere with lifetime τ, and diffuses with diffusion constant DS. (B) In contrast to other models, the rate of engulfment can now accelerate if the drift velocity depends linearly on S via v = v1S, tending to a constant as t → ∞. Parameters are v1 = 20 μm3 s−1, β = 0.1 s−1, τ = 10 s, and R = 2 μm, no diffusion. (C) In the full model, with a drift velocity that depends on the signaling molecule via a threshold, S0, and an initial latent period, t0, a sharp increase in engulfment rate can be obtained, which matches well with the measured data. Here the measured data is the average of the upper and lower lobes for the 4.6-μm bead shown in Fig. 2 C. Parameters are D = 3.8 μm2 s−1, v1 = 6 μm3 s−1, S0 = 0.498 μm−2, β = 0.4 s−1, τ = 0.5 s, t0 = 10 s, and R = 2.75 μm. (D) The dependence of the full-engulfment time on the ligand density, ρL, showing a minimum at intermediate ρL. Parameters as in panel C. Additional parameters are ρ0 = 50 μm−2, E = 3, B = 20, DS = 1 μm2 s−1, and L = 50 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of oblate and prolate spheroids. (A) Sketch of the two spheroids, parameterized by R1 and R2. For oblate spheroids (R1 > R2.), the lowest curvature region is the first to be engulfed, whereas for prolate spheroids (R1 < R2.), the highest curvature region is engulfed first. (B) Progression of engulfment with time. (Red) Oblate spheroid with R1 = R2 = 4.1 μm and R3 = 0.62 μm. (Blue) Prolate spheroid with R1 = R2 = 0.87 μm and R3 = 4 μm. (Solid lines) Full model with signaling; (dashed lines) pure diffusion model without signaling. (Solid circles) Half- and full engulfment. (Numbers) Order of engulfment. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1542-1553DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.070) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions