Factors associated with death 1 year after lower extremity bypass in Northern New England Philip P. Goodney, MD, MS, Brian W. Nolan, MD, MS, Andres Schanzer, MD, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, MD, Andrew C. Stanley, MD, David H. Stone, MD, Donald S. Likosky, PhD, Jack L. Cronenwett, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 71-78 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123 Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Survival following LEB, by indication. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 51, 71-78DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Survival following LEB, by number of risk factors. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 51, 71-78DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Kaplan-Meier survival curves following LEB, by number of risk factors. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 51, 71-78DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Comparison of observed and expected survival rates after LEB, across centers in the VSGNNE. Shown across the top of the bars are the ratios of observed and expected rates. Values greater than 1 indicate that the center performed worse than expected, and values less than 1 indicate that the center performed better than expected. Two of these differences were statistically significant (centers 2 and 9), although a significance of P < .007 would be required to completely rule out chance as a possibility of any difference across all centers. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 51, 71-78DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 5 Risk factors for survival, amputation/graft occlusion, and ambulation following LEB. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010 51, 71-78DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.123) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions