MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validation of SCIA’s reflectance and polarisation (Acarreta, de Graaf, Tilstra, Stammes, Krijger ) Envisat Validation Workshop, Frascati, 9-13 December.
Advertisements

ERS - ENVISAT SYMPOSIUM Gothenburg October, 2000 MERIS Instrument Calibration.
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Polarization measurements for CLARREO
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
Remote sensing in meteorology
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
1 Image Pre-Processing. 2 Digital Image Processing The process of extracting information from digital images obtained from satellites Information regarding.
Remote Sensing Image Rectification and Restoration
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
Radiometric and Geometric Correction
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Limb Retrieval at IFE/IUP in Bremen Working team: A. Rozanov, K.-U. Eichmann, C. v. Savigny, J. Kaiser Tests based on level 0 data Normalisation by –Solar.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
1 CLARREO Advances in Reflected Solar Spectra Calibration Accuracy K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2, G. Kopp 3, J. McCorkel 1, P. Pilewskie 3 1 NASA/Goddard Space.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Lunar Radiance Calibration ABI/AHI Solar Reflective Bands
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report
TEMPO Instrument Update
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Lunar observation data set preparation
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Extending DCC to other bands and DCC ray-matching
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
SEVIRI Solar Channel Calibration system
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
DATA PROCESSING & ANALYSIS
TEMPO Instrument Update
Concept study GOME-2/AVHRR radiance inter-comparison
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Lunar data preparation for FY-2
Instrument Characterization: Status
Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG
Data Preparation for ASTER
Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Instrument Considerations
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics
National Satellite Meteorological Centre
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
Remote sensing in meteorology
TEMPO Instrument Update
Presentation transcript:

MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg MERIS US Workshop 14 July 2008 MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg

Table Of Content Functional Breakdown Data extraction and saturation checks Radiometric model and calibration Stray-light correction Product grid and geo-location Spatial re-sampling Pixels classification Meteo Annotations Product summary

Functional Breakdown

Data Extraction & Saturation Checks data is extracted from L0 according to products limits computations time continuity is checked, overlaps removed and gaps filled (if any) each sample is checked for saturation and flagged

Radiometric Model L: incoming radiance X: raw counts b,k,m,f: band, pixel, camera, frame A: instrument gain C: dark signal Sm: smearing effect SL: stray-light (within spectrometer) g, gc: temperature dependency of gain and dark signal NonLin: non-linearity

Radiometric Calibration Invert radiometric model using: Sm from dedicated virtual band NonLin from on-ground characterisation C & A from on-board measurements g, gc from on-ground characterisation Provides

Non-linearity look-up tables Non-linearity is significant at CCD output It has been characterized as V=f(E) Converted into dV=g(V) using calibration line drawn between null illumination and the calibration point (on-orbit data) and modeled Scaled to counts using actual gain and band settings

Smearing effect Smearing : continuous sensing during charges transfer between CCD image (exposed) to storage (masked) zones. Actual channel: t0: reset CCD t0t1: transfer to exposure: integrates blue part of spectrum l [t1,t2]: in position for exposure t2t3 : transfer to storage: integrates red part (t3-t2 ) + (t1-t0) = 1.3 ms ; t2-t1 = 42.7 ms Virtual smear channel: Exposure lasts 33 times longer than transfer t0: reset t0t0+1.3: transfer to storage: integrates whole spectrum t0+1.3: storage

Smearing effect and correction Acquisition timeline: The virtual smear band integrates spectra acquired at ~t1 Each actual channel of wavelength l integrates during transfer: From UV to l at ~t1 (start of exp.) From l to NIR at ~t2 (end of exp.) The (next) virtual smear band integrates spectra acquired at ~t2 Correction scheme: Each actual channel is corrected by a weighted average of smear channel values at t1 and t2, weights being derived according to channel wavelength:

Solar Irradiance model Instrument gain includes: Solar Irradiance model Absolute characterization of reference diffuser reflectivity (on-ground) Instrument spectral model from on-ground + on-orbit spectral characterization On-board diffuser measurements

Solar Irradiance model Instrument gain includes: Solar Irradiance model Absolute characterization of reference diffuser reflectivity (on-ground) Instrument spectral model from on-ground + on-orbit spectral characterization On-board diffuser measurements 20 % in-FOV

Solar Irradiance model Instrument gain includes: Solar Irradiance model Absolute characterization of reference diffuser reflectivity (on-ground) Instrument spectral model from on-ground + on-orbit spectral characterization On-board diffuser measurements

Solar Irradiance model Instrument gain includes: Solar Irradiance model Absolute characterization of reference diffuser reflectivity (on-ground) Instrument spectral model from on-ground + on-orbit spectral characterization On-board diffuser measurements 20% in FOV too!

Straylight Correction Source is scattering & reflection within spectrometer Small contribution  can be estimated from degraded signal Can be modelled as a point spread function  convolutive process Correction using modelled PSF and approximate de-convolution

Product Grid and Geolocation Product grid definition: re-built “ideal instrument” swath Across-track: perfectly aligned cameras along  to track, inter-camera overlaps removed, regular on-ground distance sampling (geodesic at WGS-84 ellipsoid surface) Along-track: instrument time sampling, gives quasi-regular distance Geo-location: At Tie Points: every 16 pixels in RR, 64 in FR, in both directions (17 x 19 km) Geo-location (longitude, geodetic latitude) at ellipsoid surface (WGS-84) Altitude and its variability (h, sh from GTOPO-05/GTOPO-30) Illumination and observation geometry: SZA, SAA, VZA, VAA Approximate parallax correction provided over land

Product limits: RR & FR segments Product limits = start and stop times MER_RR__½P MER_FRS_½P

Product limits: FR Scene L0 extent defines TP grid Limits based on scene centre but fits TP grid Scene remains within product MER_FR__½P

Spatial Re-sampling Re-builds ideal swath from actual MERIS FOV: slightly misaligned plane + inter-camera dispersion (see figure) Keep instrument measurements: nearest neighbour To fill-in a given product pixel: Satellite ground track Across-track: detector column selected comparing across-track pointing angles Along-track: frame offset determined from known de-pointing of selected column

Pixels Classification Land/water and coastline based on an atlas Bright based on radiometry (geometry dependant threshold on reflectance at 443 nm) Glint risk based on angular distance to Sun specular reflection direction Invalid when no data available (out of swath, gap, all bands saturated)

Are added to geolocation annotations: Meteo Annotations Are added to geolocation annotations: u & v wind components at 10 m mean sea level pressure Relative humidity at 1000 hPa Total column ozone Interpolated at TP location from ECMWF data (1x1 degree regular grid)

Level 1b product summary At actual instrument wavelength: no "smile" correction Calibrated in-band radiances at 1x1.2 km (0.25x0.3 in FR) 1121 pixel wide (1300 km) wide, up to 15000 pixels long (2241x2241 pixels or 560x670 km for FR scenes, 4481 pixels wide, up to 12800 long for FR segment) Classification and quality flags provided at each pixel Detector index provided at each pixel Geolocation and meteo provided on a 16x16 sub-grid (64x64 sub-grid in FR)

Accurate geo-referencing for MERIS Land community expressed concerns about geo-location accuracy A specific post-processing tool was developed to respond to this need: AMORGOS, that adds to MERIS FR per pixel geo-location accounting for Earth surface elevation Inclusion in operational processing is considered