Academic Standards Review Committee

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Send an to departmental managers. Present the PIF process at a Division Managers meeting. Reach out to the IT Department managers. Post the forms,

Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.

Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.

Standard 4 Faculty. Committee Membership Marta Meana Carryn Bellomo Andrew Bell Skip Swerdlow.

AGC TEXTBOOK POLICY COMMITTEE 9 April, Purpose: The purpose of the AGC Textbook Policy Committee is to review the existing GRCC Textbook Policy.

Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.

LICENSING CODE READOPTION N.J.A.C. 6A:9 Sunset Date: January 20, 2009.

September 17, 2002IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview & Recommendations to Georgia.

JOINING THE TEAMCFA CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK. BRIEF OVERVIEW One Year Process 300 Point Scale Divided Evenly Between Three Committees (Academics, Business,

Curriculum Policies Universities should have a policy that enables the creation of new courses and the modification of existing courses in a way that ensures.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair.

S L I D E 0 Student Grant Program for Research and Creative Activity College Senate Committee on Research (2014/15) Members: Thomas Beal – History Kelly.

CBPA Criteria For Faculty Teaching Graduate Courses 4/10/09.

Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.

Student Code of Conduct Revision Presentation to AGC (3 of 3) April 8, 2014.

Eight Schools Information Security Policies: The Process at Hotchkiss.

Common Syllabus Components AGC – November /3.

What leadership practices do effective School Council members use to support student success? Corine Clark

Academic Standards Review Committee Winter 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer.

FACULTY ADC and Senate Revision: 0.0Effective Date: Version: 1.0 Doc. No: MMU/ACAD/SOP&WI-05 REMEDIAL PROGRAMME – UNDER PERFORMANCE STUDENTS.

1 IFAD consideration of a Code of Conduct for Executive Board Representatives Historical Background Presentation to an Informal Seminar of the Executive.

Faculty Senate Shared Governance Committee (ad hoc) Proposed Elections System College Constitution Template Committee Status.

Common Syllabus Components AGC – January /3.

Academic Standards Review Committee Fall 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer.

Preparing for a Special Visit: What Works Marjorie Jaasma, Roxanne Robbin, Scott Davis.

Policy 8.5 Catalog Policy. History This policy was revised and approved by AGC on March 11, Implementation of the policy began August 26, 2014 for.

AP Academic Program Assessment Plan for Psychology and Sociology Second Reading.

Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.

Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.

Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.

Project Management PTM721S

Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander

Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)

Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016

Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment

Report of the Personnel Committee on Promotion and Tenure Procedures

Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.

Curriculum Development Updates

Student Code of Conduct Revision

A Process for Academic Reorganization

Administrative Review Process

Senate Meeting Summary

Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion

AGC Faculty Code of Ethics Presentation to AGC April 11, 2017.

Student Code of Conduct Revision AGC - Presentation 2

Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb

University Community Briefing

Doc. No: MMU/ACAD/SOP&WI-05

Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION

Catalog Year Policy 1st Presentation to AGC January 14, 2014.

Catalog Year Policy 2nd Presentation to AGC February 11, 2014.

Living Donor Committee

Student Code of Conduct Revision AGC - Presentation 3

District discipline lead spring meeting agenda

Administrative Review Committee

AGC Children in the classroom and on campus committee

Faculty Affairs Committee

AGC Children in the classroom and on campus committee

Project Process Gather information Set up team Plan project

Accreditation: Working towards the self-study

Extension Title Series

Jennifer Batten- Chair

Presentation transcript:

Academic Standards Review Committee Fall 2014 Team members: Dillon Carr, Daniel Gendler, Pamela Laureto, Harold Lee, Thomas Street, Fred Zomer

Background Academic Standards document adopted by AGC in 2009 Companion Document to Faculty Code of Ethics Aligned to Faculty Evaluation Process and Ideology (circa 2009) Designated for Review in 2013-2014 Current Charge from AGC Review the existing standards Gather feedback from departments or groups college wide Recommend any necessary changes

Committee Actions to Date Conducted a review of the existing standards Team members solicited feedback from their respective work areas Compiled recommendations First presentation to AGC Discussed feedback and provide response to AGC during second presentation 3rd and final visit to AGC for a vote of endorsement

Committee Report As a result of our committee’s work, we recommend several proposed language revisions to the existing document to clarify its role as a set of guidelines for faculty. These proposed changes are highlighted in red within the accompanying document distributed to AGC for this meeting.

Vote to Endorse: A yes vote will endorse the recommended language changes to the Academic Standards document and complete the scheduled review