Ideas from a Corporate Educator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
A Guide to Implementation
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Purpose of Instruction
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Alignment of Teacher Evaluation to the School Improvement Process Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Almost Former Director of the Office Of School Improvement Retiring.
“A quiet classroom is not a learning classroom” Nette Archangel s.org Tammy Schales rg.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process Day 1 © 2011 National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate without permission.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Teacher Interview Project
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /5/10v. 2.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
The Common Core Curriculum By Dean Berry, Ed. D. Gregg Berry, B.A.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Questions to Consider  Why are students leaving our district?  Are we meeting the individual needs of our students?  How can we best serve our students.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
 The teacher is the decision maker and it is her job to decide on what units to include during the year or what tomorrow’s lesson plan will be.  Thought-out.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Technology Workshop 2 June 22, Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by ABE Teachers.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Lesson Planning. WHO determines what we teach? Put the following in order from the broadest to the most specific. Lesson plan State standard National.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Leadership Session Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
Step 0: Common Assessments
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Appraisal Management The Human Side.
Workshop for ART mentors
School Library Services 21
The Year of Core Instruction
Planning for Social Studies Instruction
Meeting the needs of all students
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
ELT. General Supervision
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Parent Family and Community involvement in Education
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Is there a way to increase the critical thinking skills of students?
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Illuminating the Black Box: Assessing and Monitoring Impact
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Sustaining Professional Development Initiatives
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Bronze Silver Gold Reflective learners: Are curious Talk about success
Marzano Vocabulary Instruction Follow-Up
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Lesson 3 Consumer Science
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION USING ASSESSMENT EFFECTIVELY.
THEME: QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN AN ERA OF EDUCATIONAL REFORMS
Presentation transcript:

Ideas from a Corporate Educator Fix Schools First Ideas from a Corporate Educator Mickey Dunaway Owensboro Public Schools

Let’s Begin at the End If we could be guaranteed that using a “standardized learning system” … of district-level researched, designed, and required (1) grade-level standards, (2) lesson objectives, (3) lesson activities, (4) lesson delivery, and (5) lesson evaluation … would result in more than 90% of students mastering the expected curriculum …

Processing Time (15 minutes) Could we make it happen? Would we?

An Introduction to Fix Schools First Who is Jack Bowsher? Why should I listen to him? What is his case for radical school reform?

Who is Jack Bowsher? Professional educator An accountant by training Rose through the ranks of IBM Retired as IBM’s Director of Education

His Case for Radical Reform According to the Theory of Upper Limits, an organization that is achieving 95-97% of its capacity must make a major decision. Invest large sums of money to realize a 3-5% increase in results? Or overhaul the organization to achieve perhaps a 50% gain in results?

The Theory of Upper Limits Fix Schools First, p.41

Processing Time (15 minutes) Mr. Bowsher contends that public education has reached its design limits and any major additional dollars spent are practically wasted effort. Discuss the signs/symptoms/indications that indicate that he is correct? Is there anything that convinces you that we are not close to reaching the threshold of our upper design limits? Discuss.

Essential Questions What Does He Say to Us? Does He Say Anything Important? Should We Listen?

What Does He Say to Us? Bowsher says that IBM achieved a 99% success rate in students mastering the expected curriculum and that public schools can achieve a 90% rate of achievement of expected standards. He identifies ten problems that must be solved before schools can reach the 90% goal

Problem #1 Lack of an integrated vertically and horizontally aligned curriculum Bowser places a significant emphasis on the importance and power of prerequisites Quality Principle: Solve problems before they become problems.

Problem #2 Lack of grade-level measurements Grade-level for Bowsher is a criterion-referenced standard Says few districts have grade-level assessments to measure progress Quality Principle: Measure quality all along the way and practice kaizen.

Problem #3 Lack of an Instructional System Design This is a major emphasis of Bowsher and is based on the work of Robert Gagne A learning system integrates design principles and instructional design methods to produce a set of group learning sessions, individual learning models, interactive tutoring, and high-quality motivational course materials. (Fix Schools First, p.166) Quality Principle: Always begin with a precise and detailed implementation plan

The Six Phase ISD Process Define the learning and performance objectives required to achieve the standard Document the pre-requisites for learning Determine what lessons are required Develop the instruc-tional strategy by deciding what motivational methods of teaching and learning should be utilized Develop and/or select the instructional materials as well as the delivery system Determine how a teacher will decide whether students have learned the lessons (Fix Schools First, p.45) Quality Principle: Adopt a 6 sigma approach. Do it right the first time.

Problem #4 Lack of effective lesson plans Most educators at the school (and district) level do not understand or use the ISD process and principles Quality Principle: It takes profound knowledge to affect changes in the system.

Problem #5 Lack of classroom management skills Teachers are expected to learn skills on the job. There is little training during university preparation. Problems are often traceable to lack of ISD management skills Quality Principle: 90%+ of our problems are systems issues not people problems

Problem #6 Inadequate course materials Bowsher indicates that we underutilize instructional materials as a resource Strongly emphasizes the use use of technology as a resource and tool Quality Principle: Always have the right tool for the job at hand

Problem #7 Inadequate assessment systems Most teachers lack expertise and time to develop solid assessment systems Should be a responsibility of the district with teacher input Quality Principle: Require ongoing statistical evidence that quality is built into the process. Profound knowledge .. again!

Problem #8 Lack of tutoring systems Schools must develop “just-in-time” capacity to provide tutoring when it is critically needed Quality Principle: Solve problems as soon as they arise.

Problem #9 Inadequate time to learn Suggests the “ski school” approach of grouping students based on readiness to learn the next set of lessons Quality Principle: Never pass a problem down the line to be solved at the next level

Problem # 10 No embraceable responsibility Schools are run as a series of classroom businesses consisting of independent, self-employed professionals Quality Principle: Create a constancy of purpose toward improvement

Does He Say Anything Important? Theory of Upper Limits rings true. The challenge to emulate the six sigma approach – to do it right the first time – makes good sense. His emphasis of the significance of mastering prerequisites and their critical role in lesson planning is on target. The Instructional System Design is worth a good, in-depth, conversation, analysis and trial.

Should We Listen? When costs and quality are out of control, another group takes over and rewrites the rules. ( Fix Schools First, p.49)

Let’s keep the conversation going and raise the level of the discourse.